Are You Also Considered the Master of the Plane?

Good guy, you have written out the three poisonous points of the Taneda style: the protagonist does not participate in the battle, the behind-the-scenes style does not reveal the protagonist, and the main God style does not end. You really deserve it. Not long after it was released, the main character possessed a primitive man and ended up being possessed. No one will read this kind of poisonous point. I believe you yourself know how fast your subscriptions disappear. Which of the main stream fans likes to see their own end?

Exactly the same

I saw the latest Chapter 48 and found a BUG that I don't know if it is a BUG. The civilization of the earth is just a civilization that has not even left its home planet. The knowledge compiled through research is naturally not very profound. This world is full of creation gods. With such a large base, there are always creation gods who develop science and technology. How can the knowledge compiled by such a scientific and technological civilization be inferior to that of the earth? People in the upper city may not consider it. People in the lower city cannot even live for many years, so no one will refer to it? Also, it is difficult to live forever on the road of science and technology, but it is also very easy. There are so many creation gods, and there are always those who are highly developed. Why are these creation gods still limited by their life span? The average age in Xiacheng District is only 80 years?

Sorry, my poison resistance is still too low after all. Others are okay, but when the author talks about science and cultivating immortality, I really can't stand the poisonous resistance. To get rid of the author, let's first understand what science is and what technology is! If you had just mentioned it and it would have passed, I could still have withstood it, but it turned out that I kept saying it for a long time. I was really sorry and couldn't stand it anymore. Science is not only what conforms to reality. Science is a method of studying things, rather than denying those existences that exist but do not conform to its own common sense. If cultivating immortals is a real thing, then it is part of science in itself. Aren't the various extended technologies of cultivating immortals, such as refining weapons, alchemy, formations, talismans, etc., Technology?

Although there are many shortcomings, I can feel the author's intention and emotional investment. Emotionally invested articles have a unique charm. Just like the works of Chenji, Tang Hongdou and others, they all have strong emotional investment. I am optimistic about the author's future; as long as he can keep writing, he will definitely become a god. Ps: It doesn't matter if the content is mid-range, but the content still needs to be polished.

Can you change the name of the plane? This Great Flame Plane is really unpleasant, I can't feel it at all! It looks like the name of a dynasty!

Reposted from Zhizhihu, the difference between science and metaphysics, scientific thinking. (Incomplete) Why do wizards still think M: melons are inferior in an era when nuclear bombs have been created? It's not that technology discriminates against fantasy →_→, but that technology looks down on short-sighted, complacent ignorance. (Interest related, academic Ph. D. Candidate) Not understanding science does not mean that it is unscientific to say that a person can turn into a cat or travel back in time instantaneously, but that it lacks a scientific thinking model. If the world setting is that people can change into cats, then this is an objective fact. Does using scientific methods to understand objective facts have anything to do with what the fact itself is? Science cannot say, "No", people cannot turn into cats, time cannot go back, and time cannot move instantaneously. Science will only say that these things cannot be achieved due to current scientific cognition contradictions and current technical means. But the theoretical level is constantly changing. In "The Gods Themselves", a perpetual motion machine is even invented, but the process of creating a perpetual motion machine is completely in line with scientific research thinking. That's the difference. For example, the setting of this world is that people can turn into cats. The scientific thinking mode is, why can people turn into cats? How did a person become a cat? After a person turns into a cat, where does the energy converted from the difference in mass go? What changes are happening at the molecular atomic or even subatomic level? Are there any statistically significant differences between 1,000 humans turning into 1,000 cats? Can the technology of turning humans into cats be transformed into applied technology? If people can turn into cats, can cats turn into people? If not, what's the difference? What kind of genes make people more likely to be deformed? Which gene pathway can be altered to increase deformation efficiency? Are the differences at both cellular and organismal levels statistically significant compared with the control group? The unscientific thinking mode is that just memorizing this mantra is enough. If you have to ask, then I will tell you that this is ancient and powerful magic, it is in the blood, meaning, um. Such a civilization will not progress. With or without the presence of Muggles and wizards, there is no way to progress. What if a wizard can manipulate time and space? As long as we still have scientific research ideas and methods, these will be available, and they may unexpectedly not be far away from us. The wizarding civilization has no driving force for advancement and will be eliminated sooner or later. The settings of scientific thinking and magic are not contradictory. Science is not scientific fact. Even in a "magic" world where the dimension is not three, the speed of light is not 300,000, the strong interaction force is stronger or weaker, entropy is constantly decreasing, and force is proportional to the square of acceleration, scientific thinking is still feasible. Having said all this, I won't explain it to those who still don't understand the difference between scientific theories and scientific research thinking methods. Anyway, I will blacklist them if they raise objections. The main thing is that you are not good enough. If you don't steal other people's techniques, then why don't you just wait to die? It can be said that there are advantages and disadvantages to thanking guests behind closed doors. There are fewer opportunities for mutual communication and promotion, and more security and privacy. The failure to keep up with development cannot be attributed to the lack of "my door is always open." If a group of uncivilized primitive people point to each other's exchanges, learning and promotion to develop, they do not know that "forging iron requires one's own hard work", how can one open the door? Use? Africa opened up early and established "trade relations" with a certain country long ago. Then? Let me tell you, if our own scientific research development cannot keep up, no matter how open we are, we will only be cut off by others. That's far enough, let's come back to the direct issue between wizards and Muggles. Rowling herself, as a Muggle who loves mobile phones and computers, do you think she thinks which one is more advanced, Muggles or wizards? Harry looked at the messy table, at the long Arithmancy paper with wet ink, then at the longer Muggle Studies paper ("Explanation of why Muggles need electricity"), and at the magic text translation that Hermione was working on. (13 Years old) (With all due respect, it seems that Rowling's liberal arts are just that. Muggles have never "needed" electricity, and it has no positive meaning for wizards to discuss how weak Muggles are and how they "need" electricity to survive. If I was asked to answer this question, I would answer "Try to discuss the changes in the social structure of Muggles caused by the widespread application of electricity." Yes, that is, just like we did in junior high school, to learn about the three industrial revolutions Meaning. ) "Refer to your respective charts and analyze in detail the movement of the planets that will affect you next month," she said sternly - her voice was not like her usual ethereal voice, but more like Professor McGonagall. "It must be handed in next Monday, and there must be no excuses!" (14 Years old) The education for young people in the wizarding world before they start working does not end until they are 17 years old. Do you see the difference? Education in the magical world completely lacks methodology and scientific research thinking training. And most of the homework content is copying books... Our scientific education is step-by-step and based on the materialist worldview. Let's talk about only: materialism: righteousness. I remember the first physics experiment I learned after I was in the second grade of junior high school, which was called elastic deformation. Very simply, it is to prove that the object under force will inevitably change its state of motion or deform. Naturally at that time, many of our classmates thought this was wrong based on more than ten years of life experience, because you see, when I pressed the table with my hand, the table was stressed but did not deform. At that time, the physics teacher did a very simple experiment, which was to put a laser pointer on the table and a tilted mirror to reflect the laser onto the wall. At this time, the deformation of the table becomes visible to the naked eye. There is also a hidden truth behind this lesson. Regardless of whether it can be seen with the naked eye, as long as it can be detected, it can be recognized by science. Rowling's magical world is actually the opposite. "Proof" is never taught in magic schools. Unlike our science, we teach children how to prove Newton's three laws, how to prove Hooke's law, and how to prove Ohm's law. Anyone who has studied science in middle school or high school should know that memorizing scientific facts is not important. What is important is that you master the methods to prove these scientific facts. This is the beginning of scientific research. Without proof, there is no doubt. When I started studying statistics in junior high school mathematics, I came up with a concept called: p. (It must be lowercase and italicized. Md I had to revise my master's thesis because p didn't have italics.) What is p? Do any students have any answers? P is set by me, the possibility that what I want to prove is false. What I want to do is to prove that p is less than 0.005, Which means that what I want to prove is very likely to be true. Proof begins with questioning. And Hogwarts, at least within the scope of the book, has never encouraged students to question, and no students have ever questioned it. For example, in chemistry class, hydrogen and oxygen produce water. The chemistry teacher will teach us 2H2+O2=2H2O. Why is 32g of oxygen mixed with 4g of hydrogen? The chemistry teacher will tell us about the concept of mole, what is the molar mass, and then how to balance the chemical formula, and why the valence of hydrogen in water is +1 and oxygen is -2. After learning this, next time I give you an equation you don't know, and follow the example, you can at least come up with one or two possible balancing solutions. Until one day, students may predict elements that do not yet exist based on the laws they have learned. Correspondingly, what about the potions class in the magical world? Be it Snape or Slughorn, can anyone teach students why they should stir clockwise seven times and then counterclockwise once? Why are there two drops of sneeze syrup in a pot of demulcent? As homework after class, I actually copied the uses of moonstone? ? ? What are you doing copying that stuff? I would like to sum up the teaching of Potions class at Hogwarts in two words: memorize protocol. It's just endorsement and memorizing the steps. This is actually very funny to us real scientific researchers. Have you searched all over the world's labs to find out which instructors you go to ask students to memorize that thing every day? Because that stuff is really not important, there are plenty of them, just follow the protocol when needed. He is a researcher and mentor from the laboratory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. He also prepares glue according to the protocol. How many milliliters of water and how many milliliters of SDS? Who can memorize the specific numbers? Waste of time and energy. What is important is why, the scientific principles behind these methods, and what new facts can be derived from these scientific principles. How is the teaching method of potions taught at Hogwarts different from that of New Oriental Chef School? By the way, I never memorized equations when I was in school. I always wrote and balanced them. After mastering the atomic structure and balancing method, do you still need to memorize equations? If your teacher asks you to memorize equations, he is not teaching well. So Hermione, a bookworm, can still be considered a top student at Hogwarts, which also shows how poor the thinking training at Hogwarts is. I would venture to guess that Rowling is not very good at math. Recitation, copying, and memorization are just ways to hone application skills. Is application technology important? It's important! Indispensable! Applied technology is the force that maintains the normal functioning of a society. Just like people need to eat, sleep and work to survive. But a society cannot only have applied technology, nor can it only teach applied technology. Just like if a person can only eat, sleep, work and not think, then he is just a cog. Scientific research thinking is the driving force that drives civilization forward. Then let's talk about methodology. Science has indicators. For example, in our medical field, how much blood sugar is considered high? How much reduction in tumor size is considered stable, how much reduction is considered partial response, and how much reduction is considered complete response? When a drug is administered to a subject, what specific changes can be considered effective compared to a control group? Everything in science can be quantified. Unfortunately, there are basically no energy-based things in Hogwarts. For example, Veritaserum should be as clear as water. What does clear as water mean? The demulcent should be silvery white. What is silvery white? Our medical scientific research has very specific regulations regarding the purple color that appears after the BCA reagent reacts with the protein in the protein quantification experiment. The absorbance value is purple at 562nm. What should the dosage forms of these potions be? What is the pharmacokinetic curve of blood drug concentration changes? What are the active ingredients in Polyjuice Potion that are clearly mentioned in the book? What is the concentration of the standard? How to convert between dosage and effective time? The same goes for Felixir. What is its half-life? Will there be a withdrawal reaction? Though academics like Hermione read through a lot of books for a long time, no one told them these problems. Just go by feel. That's why there are problems like after drinking Polyjuice Potion or Fuling Ling Potion, things are left unfinished and the medicine becomes ineffective. This is one of the most intuitive adverse consequences of a world without scientific research thinking. Another example is Defense Against the Dark Arts. Teacher Rowling, what is the definition of black magic? The black you are talking about is not black. The white you are talking about is white. The magic of love is awesome, right? How to define "love" here? How to effectively repeat such "love" in batches? The rule of the Elder Wand is that if a wizard defeats the original owner, the owner will change. How to define "defeat"? You can't even quantify the most basic indicators, and you don't have basic scientific research thinking. How can you talk about scientific research? In fact, Rowling, or the entire magical world's thinking model, is closer to traditional medicine. What the ancient books say is the truth. Can something passed down by our ancestors for thousands of years be wrong? Do you still need proof? Do you still need logic? No need! There is no need to delve into it or explore it. Indicators cannot be quantified, so how can you prove that your theory is correct? If the pulse is floating or sinking, if it floats more, it means it floats more, if it sinks more, it means it sinks? Can objective instruments measure it? Yin deficiency and Yang deficiency? Where is the yin? Where is the sun? How vain is it? Even the rare scientific research seedling in the entire series, Fred George, did not know to set up a control group in the human experiments he conducted when developing and researching skipping sugar. As for our "Muggle" children, we knew that the experiment was going to be done like this when we were in the first grade of biology at the age of eleven or twelve. One more thing, a hardware condition issue. Hogwarts only has a traditional paper library and no retrieval system. As a result, the speed of filtering effective information is very low. So, according to the standards of our scientific world, Hogwarts can only be regarded as a vocational and technical school. Let me explain in a unified way that "not writing does not mean there is nothing". For example, if there is only "The Philosopher's Stone", then indeed, I cannot and cannot easily determine what is and what is not in the magic world. But "Order of the Phoenix" has already described in detail the political center of the world and the largest public hospital in the region. What is science? My understanding is that it is a process of constantly proposing hypotheses, asking questions, and then constantly testing the truth through practice in order to understand the world more accurately. The real task of knowledge is to reach thinking through feeling, to gradually understand the internal contradictions of objective things, to understand its regularity, to understand the internal connection between this process and that process, that is, to reach theoretical knowledge. ——Selected Works of Grandpa Renmin, "On Practice" What kind of people don't understand science? Follow your feelings, ignore logical facts, have no questioning spirit, let alone what quantification means, um, [friendliness]. (Unfortunately, the absolute number of such people is not small) And [friendliness] is not the most terrifying thing. The most terrifying thing is that people with this kind of thinking mode that is based on politics, supplemented by personal experience, and follow their feelings can feel like they are scientists by reciting a few scientific facts. [Scientific Research Thinking] Obviously she has thrown it into the Atlantic Ocean. :) Why can't Muggles hear this car?" Harry asked. "They!" Stan said scornfully, "They don't listen well, do they? They don't listen well either. They pay no attention to anything. " We "Muggles" have seen the 3k radiation background of the universe, "seen" the six kinds of quarks below the atomic nucleus, "seen" countless cells in the human body and countless genes in the cells, "heard" the sound of gravitational waves, "heard" the sound of hydrogen fusing into helium inside the sun, and heard The sound of melting Arctic ice caps. What about wizards? Now tell me, who is not good-looking? Who is not good-looking? It seems a bit off topic, so I will leave a small question at the end. Why do wizards think that Muggles who can invent nuclear bombs are inferior? " Because Rowling knows [beep].

There is a question, with a conversion rate of 5%, why is the reward only 100,000 for a salary of 10,000? Just identifying an animal is equivalent to receiving goods from 1,000 first-level lords. A little too much

Let's just talk about the first chapter. Who gave you the confidence? A little time traveler said that no one can develop planes better than you. It's okay if you set the same starting point. Everyone has their own system. What are you pretending to do? Throw your IQ on the ground and rub it. It's so funny. Even if you memorize all the farming and development novels from the starting point, you are just talking on paper. Emma, ​​the first one is Wang Zha. I'm too lazy to talk about it.

In ancient times, was the kindness of knowing someone you met a great kindness? Let me give you an analogy: Amir was born in a slum in India. Theoretically, his biggest future in life is to be a dung worker, and then like his father, save money to get a wife, and then have a child and reproduce. Then, suddenly one day, an American appeared in front of him, told him that he appreciated his talent, and then brought him to the United States to let him receive a first-class education. After he graduated, he was allowed to enter the company to show his talent. So, you understand - The essence of the gift of acquaintance is to improve one's class, and in an era when it is more difficult to improve one's class, the effect of the gift of acquaintance is stronger. In ancient times, especially in the era when there was no class crossing, if you can be appreciated by others and cross classes, you should be grateful to this person regardless of your moral foundation. After all, this is what counts as a human being. (Of course, some non-human beings who cannot thank people but only thank God are not within the scope of our discussion.) When you are leisurely and tranquil Rebirth as parents, there is nothing exaggerated about the kindness and rebirth.

To be honest, I don't know who originally developed the Shendi Academy school. But every time I read this kind of novel, I always feel a sense of contradiction. Forget it, I won't say more, it's not my cup of tea, but I wish the author great success.

The author is very attentive and the writing is really good, which is quite enjoyable. It's just that someone else saved the protagonist's life later, although they peeked into the protagonist's memory. But in the end, they gave away money and power, and they did not threaten the protagonist, and they would help in the future. The protagonist still only wanted to kill others, and only thought about how I had been wronged, and did not want any help. Such a protagonist is somewhat ungrateful, thinking only of himself and being selfish. Not good in terms of character. Although the final outcome probably won't be like this. But this is really bad.

Does any of this nonsense have anything to do with your topic introduction? Selling dog meat for sale?

(Random thoughts) The fantasy world of mortals, no matter how mysterious, is still inextricably linked to the civilization of the earth. This is cause and effect Artistic creation cannot be separated from the ontology of art. No author's setting can be more complicated than the real history and technology of World War II, because one person's imagination alone cannot do it. Any fictional weapon or something that can be stronger than the weapons of World War II is mostly made by reading comics. The relationship between fantasy and science. Before denying science, let's ask, do you understand science? You haven't even entered the door of science and technology yet! ? Why should a person who has not even entered the knowledge of modern science and technology insist on talking about technology? Did Liang Jingru provide you with courage? I really can't understand that fantasy and science are essentially the same You can list some things that you think fantasy exists but science does not exist to discuss Isn't fantasy's mother just science with a change of clothes and a facelift? It is even difficult for mortal imagination to completely break away from common sense, let alone the real world. The real universe is beyond imagination. Even the best of the third planet in the solar system are still trying to understand it since enlightenment. What reasons do ordinary mortals have? Arrogantly facing the unknown? I don't even understand the nature of science created by the leaders of human civilization, so I talk about unscientific all day long in the name of pride and prejudice. Isn't it →_→ more arrogant and ignorant? On knowledge. Let's not talk about modern cutting-edge technology, do you understand the Fourier transform a hundred years ago? Have you read the Theory of Relativity? Can you analyze complex variable functions? ……………… What if these modern technologies are too difficult! Can you prove the Pythagorean theorem of ancient people thousands of years ago? You look down on the method of cutting a circle, but can you prove the approximate value of Wu from a circle, a foot, and an abacus? Every one of them is inferior to the ancient people from thousands of years ago. How can they have the courage to easily deny the lifetime efforts of their predecessors?

What can I say, originally I came here to see my personal plane, but in the end I saw about forty pictures, and only a few about developing my own plane, and not mentioning the others.

I really can't stand it anymore! What is the cool thing about the protagonist of the creation novel? It's civilization, the mastermind behind the protagonist. It's about building heroes, or killing heroes or demons. In person, you must at least delete all your memories and experience the world of mortals. Or have fun like One Punch Man. The new plot written here is simply a rotten routine from the starting point more than ten years ago. Obviously the new plots were so well written.

I was really unhappy when I saw the ninth level. It felt very deliberate. The protagonist was good at farming honestly. I had to do this to speed up the pace and deal with this character who felt very zz. It felt like the whole style of the book suddenly changed.

Therefore, the living conditions in the main world of novels like this where everyone has gods are not much better. It feels like if you remove the outer shell, it is just an urban novice 😥

The protagonist's identity as a time traveler was too poisonous, and his memory was peeked into. The natives used the knowledge of the earth to become a ninth-level boss.

Laughing to death