The Strongest Lion

I persevered and read dozens of chapters, but the writing is very immature. Even the adaptations are poorly done. A pride of lions can't possibly have only 2 lionesses and 10 cubs; the ratio is completely wrong. Two lionesses can't support the cubs. Since you've borrowed so much, why didn't you also borrow the part where one lionesse leaves behind to guard the house when she goes hunting? It's strange that the author didn't give us a setting of 4-5 lionesses. However, I still have to thank the author, and I hope their writing will improve.

Do you know why it's so hard to write about ferocious beasts? In modern society, even the fiercest wild animals can be taken down with one shot, or two if necessary. What if they mutate? That would fall into the "monster genre," so it's better to just write about dragons or phoenixes.

*Bang!* One shot to the head! You got shot to death by poachers! The End!

Why can't you reincarnate as an animal, strive to survive, and collect leopards, Siberian tigers, lionesses, she-wolves, and she-foxes as your harem? Why insist on cultivating immortality, on the revival of spiritual energy, and on taking human form? Can't you write something original?

Can you recommend some novels about animals? Not the kind about spiritual energy revival, just ordinary animals.

After chapter 50-something, it starts going on and on with filler. What's with this baboon? Oh, that's how it is, that's how it is, that's how it is, that's how he is... And then there's copying and pasting from the previous paragraph? Is it meaningful to keep rehashing the same thing over and over again? Do you think the readers are Sun Wukong? Are you reciting the mantra? The later chapters are just a jumbled mess of content; who's going to buy this kind of writing?!

This author has no common sense at all. Have you ever seen a male lion weighing 300 kilograms? There are very few male lions weighing 200 kilograms in the wild.

Here's a suggestion for the author: The fundamental difference between humans and animals lies in humanity versus animality. Humanity is composed of instinct, conscience, and wisdom, while animality is composed of instinct and simple thinking. An animal's simple thinking merely assists its instincts; instinct is the dominant force. Some animals, like others, leave their parents at birth to live independently. Instinct is essentially an innate talent, something they are born with, requiring no learning or imitation. Therefore, many animal behaviors are driven by instinct, which humans cannot understand and do not need to understand. Humans often do good but end up doing the wrong thing. The author writes about humans becoming like animals, with humanity taking the lead: 1. Animals only have simple thinking, like a calculator; humanity is like a computer system. If the calculator doesn't upgrade, humanity can only hibernate, dominated by animality. 2. Human nature is perfectly suited to the human body. When humanity infiltrates the animal body, and takes precedence, conflict with animal instincts is inevitable: the taste and desire for raw meat, the lioness ignoring the male lion's fight, the male lion's desire for the throne, the human instinct that two tigers cannot share one mountain… A small suggestion for the author: the readers are modern people, and the author is not a teacher to modern people, but rather should act like a storyteller, stirring the reader's emotions.

This protagonist, a lion, is a time-traveling character who always acts hindsight and feels incredibly self-satisfied. (For example: "I've smelled this scent before, but I can't remember who it belongs to?") He's appeared multiple times already. Is he really that stupid? The protagonist is practically an idiot. Author, please improve your writing; don't write such a moronic story. It's utterly uninteresting to read. 😤

The author probably doesn't know much about lions! They must have read a novel before writing this!