I Am a Chief Strategist in the Three Kingdoms

Author, hold on! Some comments are just for the sake of being black. Just to attack Cao Cao. If you write in the comment area that it's about Cao Cao, then I won't read it. It's like just plain disgusting. And some people even said that Cao Cao's men were miserable. If you read the Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms, most of Cao Cao's men died well. Don't read Romance of the Three Kingdoms as historical fact

Wait, do something for the people, and then vote for Cao Cao. It's very confusing. If you want to protect the people of Li, shouldn't you vote for Liu Bei, Yuan Shao, etc.? Among the Three Kingdoms, Cao Cao was the one who had the most fun killing cities and people... The protagonist ran to surrender to Cao Cao because he wanted to help Cao Cao kill more people in several states? It is fortunate that Cao Cao did not survive to the Three Kingdoms, otherwise he would have killed more...

It's pretty good. I've read a lot of Zheng Hege articles, and now I like to read Auxiliary

The best of the Three Kingdoms, Cao Wei, non-toxic, highly recommended After reading the first few chapters, I feel that the author's historical references are quite good, the logic is sound, and there is interaction, which is comparable to many old books. It's just that the first chapter has so many exclamation points that it's a bit uncomfortable. As a fan of Cao, I will order it, it's my childhood dream I feel that Cao Wei's post-production is more troublesome to deal with, including sides, policies, and the relationship with the second generation of Cao (I hope Cao Ang can survive, Cao Pi is too narrow-minded and vengeful, Cao Zhi is indecisive, and Cao Chong is born as a concubine, none of them are human masters). I hope the author can handle it well Also, do you feel that there have been more counselors in the Three Kingdoms recently?

"Records of Cao Cao's Massacre" I came across this book when I was looking for a book, but I didn't read it. I saw someone whitewashing Cao Cao and saying a few words. By the way, I talked about Cao Cao's records of massacre In the fourth year of Chuping (AD 193), Tao Qian was attacked and the city was massacred in Xuzhou. Juling and Xiaqiu were slaughtered, and hundreds of thousands of men and women were killed. There were no chickens or dogs left, and the Sishui River was not drained. ""Book of the Later Han Dynasty. Tao Qianzhuan" In the first year of Xingping, Xuzhou was massacred again. In the second year of Xingping (AD 195), Cao Cao defeated Zhang Miao and massacred Yongcheng. "Three Kingdoms, Biography of Zhang Miao" In the third year of Jian'an (AD 198), Lu Bu was conquered and Pengcheng was massacred. "Three Kingdoms. Chronicles of Emperor Wu" In the Battle of Guandu, Yuan Shao was killed and 70,000 troops were sent down (some say 80,000) In the ninth year of Jian'an (AD 204), Yuan Shang was attacked and Yecheng was massacred. In the twelfth year of Jian'an (AD 207), Wuwan was conquered and Liucheng was massacred. "Three Kingdoms. Biography of Gongsun Du" In the 19th year of Jian'an (214 AD), Xiahou Yuan massacred Xingguo and Wuhan; "Three Kingdoms. Chronicle of Emperor Wu" In the 20th year of Jian'an, Cao Cao defeated the Di people and massacred Hechi: In the 24th year (219 AD), Cao Ren massacred Wancheng. To sum up, Cao Cao is used to slaughtering cities, and even his subordinates are used to it, but Liu Bei has never massacred a city regardless of official history or unofficial history. When will the massacre of the city be cleared? So can the Nanjing Massacre be whitewashed? No matter what, Cao Cao cannot be vindicated, and don't brag that his merits outweigh his faults. At least I don't know because of my low education.

There is no need to whitewash Cao Cao. It is really impossible to whitewash him. However, for a character like Cao Cao, there is no need to whitewash him. He is a typical feudal warlord, and a relatively bad one. Zhu Wen, Huang Chao and Boss Cao must have something in common. Although I massacred hundreds of thousands of people in the city and indirectly killed millions, and the people under my rule were pale, ragged, and half-clothed, and taxed them as harshly as a tiger, I can still write poetry.

Open a post to briefly discuss whether the Nine-Rank Zhongzheng System is really useless. Let me make my point clear first. It's not without merit, but overall it's more than enough. So why do I say he is not useless? There is a big taboo in reading history, which is to read the minds of the ancients with the minds of today's people. So let's bring it back to that time and take a look. At the time, this was truly a pioneering move. Let me start with a familiar saying: "There are no poor families in the upper grades, and there are no noble families in the lower grades." This phrase comes from the Western Jin Dynasty minister Liu Yi's letter to Emperor Wu of the Jin Dynasty. Please remove the Zhongzheng and eliminate the Nine Ranks. In this letter, he listed various shortcomings and requested the abolition of the Nine Ranks Zhongzheng system. His proposition was supported by Wei Guan. But it was ultimately dismissed. As a result, it became the main official selection system of the dynasty for 400 years. So were all the monarchs and ministers in these 400 years idiots? I can't believe the system is so bad. Why not abolish it? I think there are two reasons (which can be refuted or added). One is the current situation, and the other is that a better official selection system has not been found. First, the current situation is nothing more than the rise of clan politics, forcing the central government to adopt this system. (The main reason) Second, due to the influence and consideration of the first, the central government also tended to this system and has not returned to the inspection system of the Han Dynasty. Because the inspection and examination system has changed. Most of the people he promoted were from aristocratic families, and they were attractive to him. If these people became officials, they would be representatives of the interests of the aristocratic families, whether they entered the court as officials or were released to other places. Then someone must have said, isn't your ninth-grade Zhongzheng system the same? No, this is different. It is worth noting that the products were made during the Cao Pi period. Not only based on family background, morality and talent were also examined. Cao Pi must be from the same family as his father, so many talented people were able to move from the barrier of local aristocratic families to official careers. The relationship between the rulers of Cao Wei and the aristocratic families was also eased this time. So no matter from which aspect. Cao Pi's nine-level Zhongzheng system is much more advanced than the Chaju system. When Sima took over the power, the situation changed again. We all know the Sima family, a wealthy family in Hanoi. The eight Sima Yi brothers were known as the "Sima Bada", so the nine-level Zhongzheng system in Sima's hands quickly evolved into the "Chaju system 2.0" And gradually became dominated by one origin. In the Sui and Tang Dynasties, due to the decline of the family, it was completely replaced by the imperial examination system. As the transition between the imperial examination system and the imperial examination system, the role of the nine-level Zhongzheng system in history is irreplaceable. The imperial examination system of the Han Dynasty could no longer meet political needs, because aristocratic families were everywhere. Even if the imperial examination system emerged, there was no political basis for its implementation. Therefore, the nine-level Zhongzheng system during the Cao Pi period (especially the Cao Pi period) can be regarded as a great innovation.

The book is not as good as Cao Cao. If you like Cao Cao, you can rest assured and I will withdraw it first.

I see many people say that Cao Cao massacred the city, and cannibalism has been recorded and is not allowed to wash away, but they all boast about Liu Bei. It is not clear whether Liu Bei himself ate others, but his army did. The hero said: The army was prepared in Guangling, hungry and trapped, the officials, big and small, ate each other. When he arrived in Yizhou, whether it was the prohibition on alcohol or the adoption of Liu Ba's suggestion to make money, they all caused harm to the people of Yizhou. Therefore, Liu Bei was not the saint that some people said and he did nothing to the people. When you say that Cao Cao is a good wife, you can check how many wives Cao Cao has. Even Liu Bei, the saint you talk about, married a wife. There are also people who are worried that the protagonist will be cheated. Cao Cao has never slept with his wife, but Lu Bu has this experience.

I'm sorry, the writing is very good, but I never read historical articles with single female protagonists. I never think that modern men will have one pair for life in ancient times. It's too fake, and Lu Lingqi's single female protagonist is indeed not enough. I wish each other well, goodbye~