Marvel's Book of Magic

I have read more than 400 chapters now, and I can't stand it anymore. In the context of the second setting after the author added so many private goods, I think the Purple Sweet Potato Spirit is really nothing, especially under the explanation of the newly released "Eternals", the Purple Sweet Potato Spirit sacrifices half to save the other half. Is there any difference between the protagonist of this book who sacrifices a few to save the majority? After the 400th chapter, the author portrays the protagonist like a psychopath. He looks like a normal person at one time and is extremely extreme but lacks personal charm. In fact, the protagonist's character should be like DC Batman's extremely extreme justice and full of madness and rationality. To be honest, Batman's character is really unlikable, but it is hard to hate. Even Iron Man's poisonous tongue is more likable than Batman. In short, the portrayal of the protagonist after 400 chapters is really a failure.

At first, I thought it was well written. When I saw Ghost Rider and Coulson stealing books, I really felt that the protagonist was not a mage, or even a person in the story. He was just a tool for the author to vent his private views and show off all kinds of mysterious "knowledge".

After reading so much, I still can't help but complain about the werewolf plot at the beginning. It's not that it can't be killed, but the reason is too weak. To be precise, this reason represents the weakness of the power system. I don't know much about the DND system. My understanding is limited to a few early starting point DND system articles such as "Amber Sword" and "Lord of the Abyss". The author's reason for killing werewolves is: even the wish spell cannot cure werewolves + werewolves are highly contagious and hereditary → werewolves must die. For this reason, I personally feel that this power system cannot even handle a werewolf? First of all, this is a Marvel world, so do the werewolves in this time and space must conform to the DND system? I am referring to the birth of werewolves. I guess that the problem of werewolves' disease in the DND system cannot be solved because the reason for their birth (because I really don't understand) makes them difficult to cure. For example, it comes from the curse of some god. If the gods exist, werewolves cannot change back. Then the male protagonist has experience as a mage from ten other worlds. Can these ten mage worlds have nothing to do with werewolves? Just use other works as an example. Although I have not seen spells or potions to cure werewolves in the Harry Potter world, there are potions that temporarily isolate werewolves from being contagious, and the duration is as long as half a year. 1 Year (the time limit of the fan fiction I read is so long, the original work seems to be a few months?); In the technological world, there are gene therapies, some using human technology, and some using Zerg technology; in short, in many worlds, werewolves are just a minor race with a supporting role, and it is indeed the first time I have seen people genocide using their harmfulness as propaganda. I personally read a lot of Marvel fics or Infinite Streaming on the technological side. Basically, as long as the protagonist goes to the genetic route, most of the werewolf-like problems can be solved, such as turning lizards back into humans (Spider-Man villains), turning mutants back into ordinary people (using the genetic factors of a certain mutant, whose name I forgot, from the American comic "Helllord"), stripping off or changing the gastroenterovirus, etc. From the technological side, it seems to be a genetic problem, and the protagonist can handle it in the middle and late stages. Taking the T virus as an example, I don't think it's possible. There are no people under the T virus, but the corpse is moving and cannot be restored, so it is meaningless to study the antidote. However, there are medicines that can prevent people from being infected after being bitten. Werewolves are living people and can be restored, so it is meaningful to study the antidote. I have seen relatively few people on the magic side, but I know that there are also ways to reshape the body and transfer the soul, and use various medicines to suppress or even eradicate the contagiousness. You can say that these costs are very high and the protagonist cannot do it in the early stage, but it is not that Alsace must make an immediate decision whether to massacre the city or not. The protagonist can deal with these werewolves who are extinct later. If someone provokes a werewolf during this period, it is purely a dead end, because a werewolf is essentially a weapon. There is no difference between a werewolf killing you and a gun. There is no difference between you provoking a stranger and being shot, or being turned into a werewolf and biting you to death. In other words, werewolves are AIDS, which can be cured but the cost is very high (not to say reality, reality is not good). The protagonist cannot do it in the early stage, so the protagonist kills all the reclusive AIDS patients. Do you think it is reasonable? Werewolves are aggressive, but there are also antisocial AIDS patients who deliberately infect others. If all AIDS patients in the Marvel world are antisocial by default, but some people can control themselves and isolate themselves from the world, do you have to go to the mountains and forests to kill these AIDS patients in order to prevent the spread of AIDS? Doesn't it stand to reason that we shouldn't study how to solve AIDS? I just think that this brain circuit monster is a terminal illness in the protagonist's heart. There is no other way but to kill him. However, this information is all instilled into him by the author. In other words, the author feels that it cannot be solved so he wants to kill it. This shows that the power system is very low. I can fight the devil, but I can't help the werewolf? If you want to say that there is a specialization in magic, but the protagonist's mage system can't do it, then you let someone who can solve it solve it? Why are you going to deal with it? What kind of infectious disease are you going to treat as a literary person? Let someone who studies medicine treat it? To put it bluntly, whether this problem can be solved depends on the author's own opinion. As long as the author is willing, the problem can be solved. I have read several novels that use the method of resurrecting Tony's father to solve the problem of Captain America's Winter Soldier's big poop. There are everything from Pym particles to souls that reshape the body. It mainly depends on what the author thinks. Currently, in order to shape the protagonist to be decisive in killing, the author chose to operate on the werewolf. The reason is that its contagiousness cannot be solved. According to the DND system, there is no solution to the werewolf (I personally understand it this way, because the author said that even the wish spell cannot be solved, which means that there is no solution, right?). But in my personal opinion, the gain outweighs the loss. It can be shaped in various ways. With the current choice, I can only think that the protagonist's system is too low and cannot even solve the werewolf problem. The protagonist is essentially a time traveler and has the experience of ten otherworldly mages. However, it is too low to come up with such a reason to attack the werewolves who are in self-isolation. I personally like to look at problems from the perspective of development. If we can't solve it at present, we must use development to solve it. Problems that you can't solve with dnd are now in the Marvel world. I, Marvel, will solve them. I will use mutants, scientists, and various spells to solve the werewolf problem. We will study and solve it from individual genes, viruses, souls, and other aspects. It's not that we can't solve your problem, so we can only solve it for you. Even if there is no solution to the problem, you think you should either kill all the werewolves or isolate the werewolves completely and become independent from the world. You should let the werewolves make their own choice. Instead, I think it is too cruel for you to lose your freedom, so I will kill you. For example, with Marvel's mutant problem, many authors also feel that humans and mutants cannot coexist, so the solution is for mutants to immigrate to the moon or other planes, and let the mutants make their own choices. If he chooses to stay on Earth, he will bear the consequences of his abilities being exposed. I personally feel that the author has limited himself a bit with the dnd system, and Marvel has become the background. The dnd system should be a tool to help the protagonist break various shackles and resolve various conflicts, rather than a shackle that limits the protagonist's ability to deal with problems. After complaining, continue reading. I hope there will be a breakthrough in the future.

Cthulhu, alchemy, pantheon, theology, Marvel, games, TV series, movies, comics. Author, you have spread your story too big, and the connections are a little confusing. One time it's Bayonetta, another time it's the magician's apprentice, and now it's Naiatlatup. I'm serious, you feel good writing it like this. Write it according to your own ideas. However, it does not take into account the feelings of most readers. Except for a small number of readers who understand this, most of them will not find the information according to the source you mentioned and then set the settings. After all, reading novels is just for leisure. Who would bother to sort out the information and set the settings? Moreover, why bother borrowing the skin of Marvel and these movies and games? If you really have the idea, just write a novel that is a mixture of Christianity and theology. It is better than trying to lay an egg by borrowing a chicken from a chicken.

I'm curious, why do some people think it's worthy of recognition to implement Brother Country's approach in a setting other than 40k? The background of the establishment of Brotherhood is a post-golden age where civilization collapsed and technology was lost. It is a collection of catastrophic dregs born from the wasteland apocalypse after mankind encountered the unreasonable disaster of the subspace storm and the ensuing alien threat. How can the society here be still prosperous, but tyranny, totalitarianism, and secrecy are rampant? The truly supreme emperor of mankind in 40k, in the golden age, he stayed anonymous and watched the development of mankind, and did not come out to take charge until the collapse of civilization. In the context of Marvel, we really don't see the need for an Emperor. Human supremacists do not believe in the efforts of human beings themselves. They jump out without warning and want to trap human beings to establish a secretive personality cult. Yue identified them as hammer brats.

Recently I have started to write very strange plots again. What you write, the author, is a Marvel fan, not a comprehensive comic or an infinite stream, and most readers of the plot you write are not familiar with it. The advantage of fan fiction is that you don't need to create characters or foreshadow the plot, but you need to write the same plot in a different way; for original work, you need to create characters and foreshadow the plot, but you only need to tell your own story well. Although you are writing as a fan, the plot you wrote is almost original, but you still use the writing method of a fan. The result is that the readers seem to be watching the fun. There is a new character and a name that they have never seen before. What is the meaning of this plot? I really can't find anything interesting, so I just delete the book and leave. If you want to write something original, I suggest you learn how to introduce characters and how to create characters; if you want to write a fanfic, just write the original plot honestly, you can write a comic plot or something. That's all I can say. If you don't change, we'll have to meet again by chance.

Alas, I originally liked Salomon, but I decided to imitate the Emperor. Everyone knows what happens to the Emperor (don't worry, people in the outer universe cannot pass the Inquisition here). Moreover, the originally cute and lovable protagonist has become very cold-blooded, and even claims to be the savior of mankind. I may receive it. The influence of "Monster Killer" is particularly deep. I don't like this view. Moreover, the charm of the Emperor is really related to his sense of mystery and responsibility. We can also understand everything the Emperor does. But Salomon is different. We have seen him since childhood, and his every move is seriously inconsistent with the previous impression. And I find it very strange that most of the plots are driven by women. After seeing each one, Sister Bei's role has changed from a fighting and killing Valkyrie to a strong woman at home. In short, it is impossible to abandon the book, but I will never touch it before it is finished😤

A body covered with holy cloth and stigmata

It feels like a kindergartener going on an outing. The characterization of the villain is really bad. In addition, whether you use character behavior to promote the plot, or use the plot to portray the character, both are possible. But the author just uses the plot and characters as materials to strengthen the worldview setting. Looks a little uncomfortable.

I feel like the protagonist is like a puppet, not living for himself at all