Marvel Magical Event Book

Recently I have started to write very strange plots again. What you write, the author, is a Marvel fan, not a comprehensive comic or an infinite stream, and most readers of the plot you write are not familiar with it. The advantage of fan fiction is that you don't need to create characters or foreshadow the plot, but you need to write the same plot in a different way; for original work, you need to create characters and foreshadow the plot, but you only need to tell your own story well. Although you are writing as a fan, the plot you wrote is almost original, but you still use the writing method of a fan. The result is that the readers seem to be watching the fun. There is a new character and a name that they have never seen before. What is the meaning of this plot? I really can't find anything interesting, so I just delete the book and leave. If you want to write something original, I suggest you learn how to introduce characters and how to create characters; if you want to write a fanfic, just write the original plot honestly, you can write a comic plot or something. That's all I can say. If you don't change, we'll have to meet again by chance.

I have only read Chapter 38. Although the author has given an explanation in Chapter 37, I feel like I still have something to say. The author's writing style is quite good. Through this chapter's comments on other people's comments, I feel that he has his own thoughts that can be used throughout. I think this book will most likely be a complete and unified work. Actually, I think it doesn't matter whether the protagonist of a book has incorrect views, is cold-blooded, or murderous, as long as the logic is consistent and the content is well laid out. When the protagonist kills the vampire's family when he first kills the vampire, I can completely understand it. After all, the vampire's family has already stood on the opposite side of the protagonist and has hurt the protagonist. The reasons for killing the vampire have been fully described before. In this case, whether it is because they affect the protagonist's pursuit of the vampire or possible revenge later, the protagonist's killing is reasonable. But Chapter 37 Killing the Werewolf did make me feel a little uncomfortable. In the author's vivid description, the werewolf became an honest, hard-working man with a family who was killed just because of his identity as a werewolf. Then the protagonist kills without hesitation. At the same time, he also killed, but it was not really confirmed whether he was the son of a werewolf. (The author only wrote "How could the son of a werewolf be an ordinary person", but my feeling is that the protagonist only killed him because he was the son of a werewolf, not because his son was also a werewolf) The author could have completely omitted this chapter and highlighted the necessity of killing werewolves in the text, rather than exaggerating a poor werewolf's powerlessness against fate. Then in the writer's statement, he mentioned the need to kill werewolves. The author's writing style is good, resulting in a high sense of immersion. As a result, the protagonist is made to do things from an absolutely rational perspective, and the focus is not all on the protagonist's perspective. After this long and emotional description, the rational behavior of the protagonist is explained in a few sentences, which feels a bit fragmented. I think the focus of the description seems to be a little off And if this is a world view of low martial arts, in order to protect ordinary people around the world, then that's okay. But this world view is set in Marvel, not to mention that the ancient pair of non-human beings are not so resistant. You just wrote before that there are mutants and S. H. I. E. L. D. The protagonist performs an act of extermination because werewolves are dangerous and uncontrollable, their mutations are irreversible, and they are different from the human race. Should mutants, Hulks, Asgardians and the like all be killed? And because mutants mutate from ordinary people, and they usually cause harm because they cannot control themselves when they first awaken, what about using magic to screen out those who can mutate and kill them? Or if we don't have this kind of magic, just kill all the ordinary people? I suggest that the author might as well just make up the story and just quote some settings. After all, the author has also added some settings from other works, so there can be fewer restrictions.

Now I see 17%, the protagonist's mentality has not changed, and it still seems to be my concern. The author pointed out that the protagonist's psychological problem has been long ago, but it has not changed at all. The core plot is that the protagonist draws a line, and then S. H. I. E. L. D. Tests like a cat, and then continues to draw a line, and continues to test The content of this 15% is not sublimated, and the religion continues to despise all religions. There is no problem. Atheism is of course okay, and there is nothing wrong with giving up the faith. There is no progress in mentality and it is very boring. I don't understand what is the main direction the author has set for the protagonist in this book? Redemption? Responsibility? There is very little progress in terms of strength, at least 17%. There was a long period before it, only "flirting" with the plot and Nick Fury. At least I haven't seen a few DND-related things Is there anyone who has watched more in the future? Tell me, what is the writing method behind it?

Won't Umbrella Umbrella Corporation show up?

I have read more than 400 chapters now, and I can't stand it anymore. In the context of the second setting after the author added so many private goods, I think the Purple Sweet Potato Spirit is really nothing, especially under the explanation of the newly released "Eternals", the Purple Sweet Potato Spirit sacrifices half to save the other half. Is there any difference between the protagonist of this book who sacrifices a few to save the majority? After the 400th chapter, the author portrays the protagonist like a psychopath. He looks like a normal person at one time and is extremely extreme but lacks personal charm. In fact, the protagonist's character should be like DC Batman's extremely extreme justice and full of madness and rationality. To be honest, Batman's character is really unlikable, but it is hard to hate. Even Iron Man's poisonous tongue is more likable than Batman. In short, the portrayal of the protagonist after 400 chapters is really a failure.

At first, I thought it was well written. When I saw Ghost Rider and Coulson stealing books, I really felt that the protagonist was not a mage, or even a person in the story. He was just a tool for the author to vent his private views and show off all kinds of mysterious "knowledge".

After reading so much, I still can't help but complain about the werewolf plot at the beginning. It's not that it can't be killed, but the reason is too weak. To be precise, this reason represents the weakness of the power system. I don't know much about the DND system. My understanding is limited to a few early starting point DND system articles such as "Amber Sword" and "Lord of the Abyss". The author's reason for killing werewolves is: even the wish spell cannot cure werewolves + werewolves are highly contagious and hereditary → werewolves must die. For this reason, I personally feel that this power system cannot even handle a werewolf? First of all, this is a Marvel world, so do the werewolves in this time and space must conform to the DND system? I am referring to the birth of werewolves. I guess that the problem of werewolves' disease in the DND system cannot be solved because the reason for their birth (because I really don't understand) makes them difficult to cure. For example, it comes from the curse of some god. If the gods exist, werewolves cannot change back. Then the male protagonist has experience as a mage from ten other worlds. Can these ten mage worlds have nothing to do with werewolves? Just use other works as an example. Although I have not seen spells or potions to cure werewolves in the Harry Potter world, there are potions that temporarily isolate werewolves from being contagious, and the duration is as long as half a year. 1 Year (the time limit of the fan fiction I read is so long, the original work seems to be a few months?); In the technological world, there are gene therapies, some using human technology, and some using Zerg technology; in short, in many worlds, werewolves are just a minor race with a supporting role, and it is indeed the first time I have seen people genocide using their harmfulness as propaganda. I personally read a lot of Marvel fics or Infinite Streaming on the technological side. Basically, as long as the protagonist goes to the genetic route, most of the werewolf-like problems can be solved, such as turning lizards back into humans (Spider-Man villains), turning mutants back into ordinary people (using the genetic factors of a certain mutant, whose name I forgot, from the American comic "Helllord"), stripping off or changing the gastroenterovirus, etc. From the technological side, it seems to be a genetic problem, and the protagonist can handle it in the middle and late stages. Taking the T virus as an example, I don't think it's possible. There are no people under the T virus, but the corpse is moving and cannot be restored, so it is meaningless to study the antidote. However, there are medicines that can prevent people from being infected after being bitten. Werewolves are living people and can be restored, so it is meaningful to study the antidote. I have seen relatively few people on the magic side, but I know that there are also ways to reshape the body and transfer the soul, and use various medicines to suppress or even eradicate the contagiousness. You can say that these costs are very high and the protagonist cannot do it in the early stage, but it is not that Alsace must make an immediate decision whether to massacre the city or not. The protagonist can deal with these werewolves who are extinct later. If someone provokes a werewolf during this period, it is purely a dead end, because a werewolf is essentially a weapon. There is no difference between a werewolf killing you and a gun. There is no difference between you provoking a stranger and being shot, or being turned into a werewolf and biting you to death. In other words, werewolves are AIDS, which can be cured but the cost is very high (not to say reality, reality is not good). The protagonist cannot do it in the early stage, so the protagonist kills all the reclusive AIDS patients. Do you think it is reasonable? Werewolves are aggressive, but there are also antisocial AIDS patients who deliberately infect others. If all AIDS patients in the Marvel world are antisocial by default, but some people can control themselves and isolate themselves from the world, do you have to go to the mountains and forests to kill these AIDS patients in order to prevent the spread of AIDS? Doesn't it stand to reason that we shouldn't study how to solve AIDS? I just think that this brain circuit monster is a terminal illness in the protagonist's heart. There is no other way but to kill him. However, this information is all instilled into him by the author. In other words, the author feels that it cannot be solved so he wants to kill it. This shows that the power system is very low. I can fight the devil, but I can't help the werewolf? If you want to say that there is a specialization in magic, but the protagonist's mage system can't do it, then you let someone who can solve it solve it? Why are you going to deal with it? What kind of infectious disease are you going to treat as a literary person? Let someone who studies medicine treat it? To put it bluntly, whether this problem can be solved depends on the author's own opinion. As long as the author is willing, the problem can be solved. I have read several novels that use the method of resurrecting Tony's father to solve the problem of Captain America's Winter Soldier's big poop. There are everything from Pym particles to souls that reshape the body. It mainly depends on what the author thinks. Currently, in order to shape the protagonist to be decisive in killing, the author chose to operate on the werewolf. The reason is that its contagiousness cannot be solved. According to the DND system, there is no solution to the werewolf (I personally understand it this way, because the author said that even the wish spell cannot be solved, which means that there is no solution, right?). But in my personal opinion, the gain outweighs the loss. It can be shaped in various ways. With the current choice, I can only think that the protagonist's system is too low and cannot even solve the werewolf problem. The protagonist is essentially a time traveler and has the experience of ten otherworldly mages. However, it is too low to come up with such a reason to attack the werewolves who are in self-isolation. I personally like to look at problems from the perspective of development. If we can't solve it at present, we must use development to solve it. Problems that you can't solve with dnd are now in the Marvel world. I, Marvel, will solve them. I will use mutants, scientists, and various spells to solve the werewolf problem. We will study and solve it from individual genes, viruses, souls, and other aspects. It's not that we can't solve your problem, so we can only solve it for you. Even if there is no solution to the problem, you think you should either kill all the werewolves or isolate the werewolves completely and become independent from the world. You should let the werewolves make their own choice. Instead, I think it is too cruel for you to lose your freedom, so I will kill you. For example, with Marvel's mutant problem, many authors also feel that humans and mutants cannot coexist, so the solution is for mutants to immigrate to the moon or other planes, and let the mutants make their own choices. If he chooses to stay on Earth, he will bear the consequences of his abilities being exposed. I personally feel that the author has limited himself a bit with the dnd system, and Marvel has become the background. The dnd system should be a tool to help the protagonist break various shackles and resolve various conflicts, rather than a shackle that limits the protagonist's ability to deal with problems. After complaining, continue reading. I hope there will be a breakthrough in the future.

Cthulhu, alchemy, pantheon, theology, Marvel, games, TV series, movies, comics. Author, you have spread your story too big, and the connections are a little confusing. One time it's Bayonetta, another time it's the magician's apprentice, and now it's Naiatlatup. I'm serious, you feel good writing it like this. Write it according to your own ideas. However, it does not take into account the feelings of most readers. Except for a small number of readers who understand this, most of them will not find the information according to the source you mentioned and then set the settings. After all, reading novels is just for leisure. Who would bother to sort out the information and set the settings? Moreover, why bother borrowing the skin of Marvel and these movies and games? If you really have the idea, just write a novel that is a mixture of Christianity and theology. It is better than trying to lay an egg by borrowing a chicken from a chicken.

I'm curious, why do some people think it's worthy of recognition to implement Brother Country's approach in a setting other than 40k? The background of the establishment of Brotherhood is a post-golden age where civilization collapsed and technology was lost. It is a collection of catastrophic dregs born from the wasteland apocalypse after mankind encountered the unreasonable disaster of the subspace storm and the ensuing alien threat. How can the society here be still prosperous, but tyranny, totalitarianism, and secrecy are rampant? The truly supreme emperor of mankind in 40k, in the golden age, he stayed anonymous and watched the development of mankind, and did not come out to take charge until the collapse of civilization. In the context of Marvel, we really don't see the need for an Emperor. Human supremacists do not believe in the efforts of human beings themselves. They jump out without warning and want to trap human beings to establish a secretive personality cult. Yue identified them as hammer brats.

Alas, I originally liked Salomon, but I decided to imitate the Emperor. Everyone knows what happens to the Emperor (don't worry, people in the outer universe cannot pass the Inquisition here). Moreover, the originally cute and lovable protagonist has become very cold-blooded, and even claims to be the savior of mankind. I may receive it. The influence of "Monster Killer" is particularly deep. I don't like this view. Moreover, the charm of the Emperor is really related to his sense of mystery and responsibility. We can also understand everything the Emperor does. But Salomon is different. We have seen him since childhood, and his every move is seriously inconsistent with the previous impression. And I find it very strange that most of the plots are driven by women. After seeing each one, Sister Bei's role has changed from a fighting and killing Valkyrie to a strong woman at home. In short, it is impossible to abandon the book, but I will never touch it before it is finished😤

A body covered with holy cloth and stigmata

It feels like a kindergartener going on an outing. The characterization of the villain is really bad. In addition, whether you use character behavior to promote the plot, or use the plot to portray the character, both are possible. But the author just uses the plot and characters as materials to strengthen the worldview setting. Looks a little uncomfortable.

I feel like the protagonist is like a puppet, not living for himself at all

Two points to complain about: 1. The logic that werewolves must die if they are contagious is equivalent to the reality that if there is an infectious disease, they must die. 2. The protagonist has such a sense of moral responsibility, which made me feel that I had seen a fake before. Didn't he specialize in stealing and robbing in the beginning?

When I first saw the werewolf part, the author had some disputes with many book friends. I feel that there is a discrepancy between the author's application of values ​​and the expectations given by the title introduction. The protagonist's behavior is placed in Faerun and other dnd worlds. It is perfectly fine to say lawful good, but this is the earth world. The order requirements and moral bottom lines of the two worlds are different. It is definitely not lawful to lynching people without permission on Earth (the Avengers have special law enforcement powers from S. H. I. E. L. D.), And it is definitely not kind to directly kill those who give up resistance (think about people like the Joker who cannot be killed according to the law). The productivity of the earth is not that of the Middle Ages. It is absolutely fine to equip each werewolf with a half-meter-thick iron cage. It just depends on whether there is a feasible solution. Are these werewolves really necessary to kill in the Marvel worldview? Now the protagonist's behavior is not considered kind in Marvel, but the author insists on saying that it is kind in DND, which is completely wrong. If the author wants to describe a lawful good character, it is recommended to compare it with Spider-Man. If it is a DND type, it is better to use an anti-hero character such as the Punisher.

I have read more than 200 chapters. It is a very interesting book. But I would like to ask, when the protagonist develops his own organization or develops the plot, does he always rely on new girls? First there are the two witches, I think these two are quite good; the goddess of wisdom is also good as the adoptive mother, not obtrusive; Lorna is also okay, the sister role; but the Hannah of Extremis Virus, the high priest of the Druid Order, and even the development of the plot of Marduk's Seventh Throne are his daughters instead of sons... What about the boys? The development of the plot depends entirely on the girls, and most of these girls are strong women. I'm really tired of watching it, aren't you? 😒 I don't disagree with using female characters to develop plots, but can we not use them all the time, and every new plot should have a new female character. And there are too many words written about female characters and tend to be positive, but the descriptions of male characters except the protagonist are a bit negative, such as the timidity of Ghost Rider; Dave of the School of Merlin is a bit unprogressive. His plot has nothing else except "I want to accompany my girlfriend", and there is no male protagonist. Accompanying the witch every day, and then talking about his girlfriend when doing business, why he makes Dave so disgusting; the latest Gerald I saw is also a villain with no knowledge... Other people like Stark and Fury have negative sides, but the positive image still exists because of the Marvel plot, and I accept this image. But I read this book because of the new characters you described. The new male characters are unspectacular, have no independent opinions, and are petty... The new female characters all have "special skills", are beautiful, and reasonable. At least they know what they should do and what they shouldn't do... They don't play like this I want to ask other readers, is this still the case in the future? I can't hold it any longer 😢

The protagonist is always incompetent and furious at the people in S. H. I. E. L. D.? ? Do you still have the nerve to call yourself the successor of the Lord of Humanity?

The protagonist is a very typical Jew. In humanism, other races except humans are unimportant, much like Marshal Garithos in Warcraft. The protagonist rejects aliens just like Garithos rejects high elves 😂

I feel that the author's moral thinking in the vampire chapter is inexplicable. He just protected the crime and did not die. After he pulled out a gun and attacked the police, is there anything else to feel guilty about? On the contrary, if you kill an honest werewolf later, you may feel guilty. It would make more sense logically if the part where the protagonist feels guilty is moved back a little.

There's nothing wrong with the writing of this book, but it just doesn't feel right when I read it. It probably won't be popular, I don't know if it will get better after it is put on the shelves.

Well, this new book can be said to have almost no reading threshold! Everyone is welcome to subscribe!

Why don't you update it? Or just finish it as soon as possible?

So, is Joan of Arc the heroine? I always feel like I'm having an affair all the time, but it's different from Sister Bei's 🙂