Conquering the Qing Dynasty

It's the best one about the Qing Dynasty's rebellion. I love reading this one 😍. I'd like to give the author a few small suggestions. It's up to you to listen or not. Isn't there too much drama between two women? It seems very discouraging. During the Qing Dynasty's rebellion, they were in Taiwan. They had soldiers and food, so they could vigorously develop the navy. The two foreign dynasties in Chinese history, Yuan and Qing, both relied heavily on the Grand Canal. They could cut off water transportation and grain supply, and at the same time support internal rebel forces such as Shandong Qingshui Sect, White Lotus Sect, Luo Sect, Hunyuan Sect, and Wenxiang Sect. Finally, get a golden finger for the pig's feet and add some essence😊

I am not advocating for the feudal monarchy system, but the system should adapt to the environment of the times, right? In modern China in 2020, when the literacy rate is close to 96%, there are a lot of rumors about "iodized salt to protect against radiation", "Isatidis can cure SARS and COVID-19", pyramid schemes, cults, and feudal superstitions everywhere. How can China, which had a literacy rate of about 5% 300 years ago, build a democratic republic? A democratically elected government? Even in the late Qing Dynasty, when she was faced with internal and external troubles and was reduced to ashes, Cixi was forced to live for another 60 years and survived into the 20th century. In the context of an era when we have not experienced the impact of foreign cultures, the threat of national subjugation, the ideological and cultural changes of the New Culture Movement, and the Confucian feudal imperial thoughts are deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, a "republic" is a regime that seriously weakens the authority of the central government and lacks executive power. A lot of monsters and monsters will appear every minute and tear the country apart!

In that era, when the emperor suddenly disappeared, those who were educated in Confucianism might go crazy. An uneducated person would be at a loss without an emperor. Anyway. That era was not suitable for the emperor to suddenly disappear. The best way is to let the protagonist bear the name of an emperor. Just do presidential stuff. It won't cause people to drink randomly and make people confused. Ancient China. The emperor was more than a ruler. He is also a symbol of a nation and the spiritual sustenance of the nation. It is also a semi-divine belief. It cannot disappear suddenly. That kind of blow. Than for a devout Christian to admit that God does not exist. At that time, the people will definitely be in chaos. Then suddenly something else appeared. Chaos is before your eyes. Ancient people versus emperors. Just like Christians do to God. It is a symbol and belief. At a time when 99% of people are ignorant. The emperor could have no rights. But there must be a symbol. Anyway. In that ancient environment. The emperor cannot disappear all of a sudden. The emperor disappears. Faith disappears. My heart suddenly felt empty. A lifetime of faith is false. The spiritual sustenance suddenly collapsed. Chaos ensues, then madness. The subsequent riots resulting from the collapse of faith were inevitable.

I really don't want to complain, but when I mention Europe, I ignore their long history of "relative democracy" and ignore the turmoil and the victims of the so-called development of medicine, military, and technology. But in ancient China, any situation, such as technological stagnation, unemployment caused by increased productivity, refugees caused by natural disasters, restrictions on the movement of people, the inability to restrict people, excessive taxes, and the inability to collect taxes, all became the incompetence of the dynasty, institutional flaws, and even the root of civilization and culture. Even natural disasters themselves were ignored. In general, readers generally believe that Europeans are worth the "sacrifice" whether it is meaningful or meaningless for development. Once in China, no matter whether it is meaningful or meaningless "change" and causing casualties, it is not acceptable. The closer we are to our own era, the less "sacrifice" is allowed. But once you switch to the protagonist and master the "absolutely correct line of progress", all sacrifices are worth it. All opponents, even potential opponents, deserve to die, and the three tribes should be implicated to avoid future troubles. Now the Internet historical environment has begun to criticize Yang Guang, but which protagonist and readers who "represent progress" are not "Yang Guang"?

The time traveler is a cat crying like a mouse and pretending to be compassionate. He clearly has enough advantages to overthrow the Manchu Qing Dynasty but insists on vigorously developing economic infrastructure while fighting foreign wars. He cannot distinguish between the primary and secondary tasks that the protagonist should do first to overthrow the Manchu Qing Dynasty. The time traveler always complains about the Manchu Qing Dynasty. Well, since you have the ability to change this world, then go and unify this country and change this world. Don't sit on the other side and watch the people living in dire straits under the Manchu Qing rule. First let them live like human beings, and then let them have enough to eat.

This book feels very much like the Anti-Japanese War period

Emotional drama is grinding, and I am confused with several women. Can't you be more decisive? Give birth to more children quickly to ensure the inheritance, and write about rebellion, hegemony, war, politics, economy, education, etc. Seriously. Can't you be more serious?

According to the rate at which the Qing army killed civilians in the book, the population could be reduced by half at the time of reunification, and there would not be many people left. And the Qing army in the book can withstand casualties better than modern armies. The casualties suffered by the army have a lot to do with the strength of the officers. How did the Qing army support half of its casualties?

It took 300 years of the Renaissance and 100 years of the Enlightenment to create a republican United States in the New World. France, the birthplace of the Enlightenment, went back and forth between a republic and an empire many times. Since 1841, after experiencing internal and external interference, with the success of countless people with lofty ideals, various social trends of thought have fluctuated with each other, and N systems have been tried, modern China has emerged. In China, which was under imperial rule in 2000, at the peak of the imperial system in the 18th century, it was unrealistic to rely on one person to propagate the establishment of a republic, or to favor gczy's republic. The foundation of social ideological trends and a unified consensus are the foundation of the upper-level political system. There is no best system, only a suitable system. Republic is not a panacea.

Well written. When modern people travel back in time, they will definitely integrate with the world, mobilize resource trade in neighboring countries, and use colonies to solve domestic problems. For internal education and cultivation of scientific and technological objects, the most important thing is thick black science and the law of the jungle. I also suggest adding less emotional drama and not telling the truth. Don't give women too many rights, take it step by step,