Start Shooting Ghost Movies from Station B

I have been reading online articles for 12 years. I have read a lot of novels by platinum writers and a lot of well-known horror and supernatural novels. I think I still have good taste. My overall evaluation of this book is: 1. The subject matter is novel: It takes ghost films as the core, but it takes root and sprouts from it, and finally "sublimates" it. 2. Creative enough: Always unexpected and reasonable. There are occasional calculations that are both expected and unexpected.     3.：，，，，     4.：，，， 5. High intention: Works with high intention may not necessarily be excellent, but excellent works must have high intention. This is true for ghost films and novels. 6. Good writing: Not much to say, the writing is above average. Although this article does have flaws, overall it does not hide its flaws and has full potential. Although I really wanted to, I decided not to mention other works in the end, so as not to appear to be flattering and undermining others. Next I will talk about this book in detail: [The following content contains spoilers, please read with caution if you have not read it] ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ One of the features of this book is naturally the "ghost film". Obviously, the author has put a lot of thought into ghost movies. From the plot to the details, they are all excellent. It even makes people wonder if he is a professional (I asked, no). The focus is undoubtedly on ghost movies, not ghost actors. The script is so exciting that many people, including me, want to help the protagonist make a movie in reality (someone has already asked the author to authorize it). Ghost movies are stories within stories. Some people may think that ghost movies are under the control of the protagonist. The ghost abilities and script settings are all virtual and not scary. But in this case, isn't the novel itself also virtual? Of course, it is undeniable that the plot of the ghost movie is indeed much more exciting than the reality of the protagonist. To a certain extent, it is also very "realistic". From a literary perspective, this is exactly the characteristic and difference between short works and long works, so don't be too surprised. The point is, ghost movies are not just ghost movies. Yes, it is not impossible if the author just repeats the process of "signing ghost actors and shooting the film", and then concentrates on the ghost film, turning the entire novel into a form similar to a unit drama. But the author did not. The author is not satisfied with the Journey to the West-style plot, or with the one-time plot of Xiaobai's novel where characters are thrown away after use. Instead, he uses these ghost films as foreshadowing. To be honest, when I discovered that the protagonist's first ghost film had directly expanded into a whole world through subsequent experiences, and then deduced a different kind of horror belonging to the whole world, and implied a different kind of realistic meaning, I was absolutely amazed. One house, one world, that's all. From one side to the whole, from limited to infinite, the author showed me his level and made me look forward to it. The first film is already like this, what about the other films? What about those other audience characters that keep showing up? This is the pattern. It can be said that since a film has expanded into a world, the latitude of this book has been upgraded. In my 12 years of reading novels, I have seen enough of the same routines that change the source but not the medicine. What I love most is this kind of unexpectedness. Whether it is inside a ghost movie or outside the movie, there are always surprises, and even some are unexpected, and it is the unexpected that deliberately makes you think you have guessed it. Remember, not only horror and supernatural novels, but any novel has failed when you can predict its specific plot development. The excellence of this book is not just unexpected. Conception. A novel with a purpose may not necessarily be good, but a novel without a purpose is definitely bad. The protagonist intentionally or unintentionally uses ghost movies as a metaphor for reality, and the film critic in the book analyzed the connotation vividly. I have seen some people say that they are bragging... But what are some of them that are not true? In reality, aren't there a lot of people who have only scratched the surface and watched a lively movie, but would not be able to understand it at all without detailed analysis in a full-length film review? There are also more people who are capable but have no intention of watching the film over and over again, thus missing the details and need to be reminded by film reviews! The over-understanding of film critics is even more correct and normal. At this point, I have to say the amazing and novel writing techniques boldly used in this article. It is also a ghost film - Filmmaking is a kind of narrative. Novel script, a narrative. Watching movies from the audience's perspective is a kind of narrative. Analysis of professional film criticism, a kind of narrative. The novel-style script is mainly used, and the other three narratives are combined, echoing before and after without repetition, and emphasizing different components at different peaks to achieve the final complete plot. What a bold and novel writing technique! The author also has a clear idea, can control the details, and is not confused or confused. He can enjoy it in one set, which is really amazing! Of course, there are advantages and disadvantages. As a newcomer, the author still has immaturity. The most obvious thing is the ghost collection in the early stage, which always seems to be a joke. It is several orders of magnitude different from the quality of ghost movies. It is really too little thought. It really makes people worry that some readers will be directly persuaded to quit. All I can say about this is... Come on! I started to get excited after seeing the first ghost movie! QWQ To sum up, this novel has great potential in the horror and supernatural world. Other ones that have interested me, some have fallen by the wayside (doesn't your conscience hurt for the author of a certain late-stage crotch-pulling novel *angry*), some have never been highlighted (you are scarier than a ghost *smile*), and some are more about romance than horror. I wish the author to stay steady and maintain this level until the end. If you are not popular, God will not tolerate it!

Name: Jiang Nuo Gender: Male Age:? ? Talent: Summon Ghost Wife Corpse Title: Red and White Evil Skills: Sense of Yin Qi, Vampire, Corpse Poison, Creation of Walking Corpses Introduction: A rich man from the Qing Dynasty was killed by gangsters while playing with his wife and children and became a zombie. The evil ghost seeks revenge. Now he wants to find a place for his family to live and becomes a male protagonist. {"NickName":"Book Friends 20200611163627879","UserId":349851738}

I have something to say It's the author. If you really want Xueyi to be a tool, then you shouldn't write the protagonist at the beginning, promising to be responsible for Xueyi. Such words will make readers think that the protagonist is a completely emotionless person. Since you persuaded him with words, then you naturally have to fulfill your promise. In the author's setting, ghosts are driven by their own emotions and feelings. When being treated like this, why didn't Xue Yi react at all? I feel like the author has this way of writing when writing about supernatural beings with tool ghosts. Just like Chen Dachui in I Have an Adventure House, they convinced their employees with words, but the protagonist didn't regard them as human beings at all, they were just tools. Since you want to use them as tools, you might as well write them as suppressing them with force. The ghosts constructed by the author have feelings. Then you have to treat him well, otherwise why wouldn't he leave you? This isn't a Pokémon. Even Pokémon will defect if their favorability points are lost. The ghost is not written as a character at all, so it feels like the ghost has become a tool. Since you set the ghosts as tools, don't write about them being moved by the protagonist at the beginning. Just like the ghosts in Mysterious Resurrection have no emotions or reason at all, they just use manipulation. In this case, you should treat the ghost as a tool. But that's not the case with your settings. Rather, the ghost has been conquered by your charisma and is willing to stay with you. But you, the author, did not write about that charisma. It feels like the protagonist is completely using ghosts as tools. Who would follow someone who treats themselves as a tool?

Come on (ง •̀_•́)งAlthough I am poor, my recommendation votes will not be less

Reading this book unconsciously compared me to a house of horrors. I only finished the part about peeling an apple, and I haven't read the rest. The plot is okay, but the portrayal of the protagonist is unsatisfactory and not calm enough. The only characteristic is that the obsession is deep enough. However, when it is portrayed, I always feel that the protagonist is not capable enough, but he is stubborn, letting his teammates carry the thunder in bloody clothes, and then leaving with his pants up after the end. It lacks a trace of human touch.

The author overestimates the protagonist's directing ability, I'm just here to see the ghost. The whole article introduces the protagonist's great directing ability and complains about the third-rate script. I can only say that I am not wrong. It is enough to say the content of the script once during filming. It is not necessary for fans to do it again after reading it. This is not enough. Fans have to introduce the script again, a total of three times. The ghosts are just for decoration. Since the protagonist is arranged to eat the soft rice of ghosts, it will be delicious. With ghosts as the protagonists, real ghosts have unique resources. If you don't make red flowers, you use them to make green leaves.

After reading dozens of pictures, I can summarize: it is tasteless to eat and a pity to throw away. I can only say that it doesn't look good, and it's not considered poisonous.

Let me tell you my opinion. The following only represents my personal thoughts. The plot is compact and basically does not drag on. I wouldn't say that writing thirty chapters and forty chapters on a ghost story would not be too overwhelming. Although there are indeed a few minor issues, they are completely covered by the compactness of the story. Maybe you're a little anxious? There is nothing much to say about the world view, but modern society allows ghosts to make ghost movies. To be honest, I have seen relatively few of them, so I can't say that I can give you a very impressive idea. But very attractive. There are relatively few characters appearing now, and the follow-up main plot should be the numbers on the tongue and the growth of Xueyi. As for whether others will appear in the future, we will wait and see. (So ​​when will the protagonist marry Xueyi?) I have read most of your complaints and suggestions, and they are mostly compliments. So I think there is absolutely no problem if the author insists and puts it on the shelves. There is nothing else. I will continue to follow this book. Although some parts are emmmm... A bit toxic to me, but it doesn't matter at all. I'll add some follow-up stories in the future. Finally, I would like to ask the author, can the update be faster?

I have no feeling, so I can only feel that the audience is embarrassing me...

No matter how much I watch the video stories written by the author, I have no sense of immersion. The main reason is that I can't picture the scene in my mind, so when it comes to the part where netizens lie about it, I am confused. Isn't it a horror and supernatural video? Why does it look like an art film? ? ?

To be honest, this book is divided into two elements, making a movie and horror. First, making a movie, making a horror movie or acting as an actor with real ghosts. I don't feel the horror in your description, it's more like a can of chicken soup. Only you can kill yourself. This kind of chicken soup is The audience was embarrassed, the audience described it as creepy, but I didn't feel the creepiness. Don't say I didn't read carefully. I listened to the book. I couldn't feel the horror even if I listened to the book. The audience was creepy. The second movie was the one that made me feel like chicken soup the most. The despair of being distrusted by the world, and then committing suicide to save myself, I didn't see the horror at all Secondly, the horror, the first task, I felt a little bit when I was under the bed, but I have seen this plot before, and then it was about peeling an apple. I won't say much about plagiarism, it should be I know that the scene I mentioned appeared in that book. The scene of the decapitated ghost is the least interesting and has no feeling. There is no foreshadowing or hint. It just starts the monster directly. It gives me the feeling that I am watching a ghost movie, and then a zombie suddenly appears and directly confronts the enemy Horror novels do not mean that you just have to write about ghosts. As for the ghost in red, you must have seen this story on the Internet. First, everything was normal, and then I found out that there was a girl under the bed. At this time, I was very scared to think about who was on the bed. It was creepy, and it was a ghost on the bed. As for the plot in another book, I don't eat the food in the coffin. Others told me that only the dead are put in the coffin. It's okay to think like this. Children are not sensible. But think about it the other way around, where the food is placed, the refrigerator. Is there a corpse in the refrigerator?

After watching so many ghost movies, only the old corpse in the mountain village is the scariest. I have been a shadow since I was a child. Even now I am afraid to stretch out a hand when I go to the toilet.

Author, here I am, Emma, ​​finally posted

This is a bragging. When I saw the review, I was poisoned. I just said it was a ghost. It was another version of myself. Although it was played by a ghost, I never said it was a ghost until the review. It only said it was another self. As a result, the reviewer directly said that it was a ghost. Also, it was a bragging. The person who made the bragging was extremely embarrassed.

I don't know why, but I'm not interested at all in the protagonist's quest to find a ghost. I'm very interested in the short story of the movie that will be made later and the movie reviews.

I just saw the so-called first short film shot by the protagonist... This is completely the author's self-pleasure... Does this have anything to do with ghost movies... Does the author feel that he is not a director of literary and artistic films for nothing...

The writing is very engaging, good luck to the author!

This book is beautiful and the author is great!

I just gave you three Chinese writer votes and four recommendation votes＾0＾~

I hope Shanshanshan will update soon

Four recommendation votes are given, the author cheers

The writing is really good. The author's big ideas are really attractive, but the number of words is too few 😭

I've seen Chapter 207. It's wonderful. Let's continue.

Author, I may not have time to write, please wish me well... 😭😭😭