I'm Just a Substitute Teacher

Should a teacher only teach talented people with potential? From this, we can see that our education really has a big problem. Growing up, there were a few parents and teachers who would tell their children that it didn't matter if they couldn't go to college, and it didn't matter if they didn't make a lot of money. I just wanted you to be safe and healthy. Some children don't have that talent from the beginning. Every time they fail in a test, those who can comfort them usually tell them that they are too obsessed with playing games because they don't work hard. When we fail, what we want most is to be comforted, not by our loved ones or those around us who keep saying you are a waste, why don't you work hard and make progress? Obviously there are many paths in life, why do everyone chase the path that belongs to others? In a mediocre life, only you know whether the shoes fit your feet or not. You know whether your life is good or not. This does not mean that people should not work hard to make progress.

This book is enjoyable, but it also has many flaws. First, the protagonist is set as a support teacher, but his work is too utilitarian. It's not that the protagonist is wrong, but the volunteer teachers have always shown the public that they are not afraid of hardship or tiredness, and they are determined to let the children in the mountains walk out of the mountains and have a bright future like the children in the city. It can be said that they are self-sacrificing. This is why when we mention rural volunteer teachers, we are in awe. However, the protagonist only teaches geniuses, and there are differences and conflicts between the utilitarian nature of teaching and the public image of supporting teachers. I think this is one of the reasons why many readers leave comments in the comments. Second, is talent innate and immutable in genes, or can it change with factors such as environment, education, interaction with people, etc.? The former has a tone of blood theory, while the latter is a struggle against fate. This is also the focus of debate among readers, and it is also the unavoidable tone of this book. Everyone who has read the book knows the difference between the theory of innate blood and the theory of acquired struggle, so I won't go into details. The biggest drawbacks are these two. Everyone will have a sense of empathy when reading a book. People who have been severely beaten by society should know whether they are geniuses or ordinary people. This sense of empathy is really embarrassing and somewhat uncomfortable. Note: (Write about the difference between modern times and others such as fantasy. If you can really cultivate immortality, who would think that you are worse than others? Everyone is very confident, but the reality is different. Real life reminds you all the time, you are not good, you are just an ordinary person, not a genius, no Fantasy. ) I know that there are some irritable old men who will say, "Reading an online article, there is so much bullshit, it's so satisfying." I can only say, I'm sorry, if I read too many books, I can't help but think about its rationality within the framework set by the novel. At the same time, between the lines of the novel, this is also the communication between the imagination and thinking between the reader and the author. I can't just enjoy it without trying to think and understand the author's ideas for writing novels. The tone of the novel can be set by the author, but the logic must be coherent. For example, the Lord of Mysteries is a typical example. Finally, I hope the author will write better and better.

You can teach students in accordance with their aptitude, but the prerequisite is that there is no discrimination. If the protagonist is a teacher from a key high school, I don't think there is anything wrong with pinching the point. However, the evaluation of volunteer teaching should not be based on how many Qingbei teachers have been taught, but how many children have been brought out of the mountains. Maybe ordinary children can only go to high school, and the better ones can go to ordinary universities, but they also have a brighter future. Even if you don't go out of the mountains, it is a good thing and meaningful for your children to learn more. If the purpose of this system is just to cultivate more geniuses, then there is absolutely no point in supporting teaching in mountainous areas. You can directly pinch tens of thousands of people in key high schools every year.

Support teachers refer to people who go to poor areas to support education and help poor areas get rid of illiteracy. This is why we admire them, especially female teachers. Who doesn't want to live a good life in the city, but some of them are willing to support them for their hometown and their ideals. Some are even just passionate love at the beginning, for utilitarian reasons such as gold plating, but we cannot deny them (her), and even welcome them (her). When my dad was in school, he had to help the teacher's family farm. Getting back to business, let me talk about the protagonist. Is the protagonist just trying to educate geniuses? Then what's the point of the protagonist going to teach? Sage Confucius said: There is no distinction in teaching, teach students in accordance with their aptitude. The purpose of volunteer education is to help the next generation get rid of poverty. A genius, even if he is illiterate, has a flexible mind that ordinary people can use. The protagonist only teaches geniuses and not other students. This will only make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Is this the purpose of national education support? I am born with talents that will be useful. I can think of Boai's supporting teacher as a mediocre student. His statistics are not outstanding, and he is even stupid. He is unqualified at the highest level, but the teachers can teach them a skill. I can think of a great teaching teacher as a teacher who treats everyone equally, and should cultivate geniuses, but also teach other students how to behave. What I can think of about the lovely volunteer teachers is that when they were transferred out at the end of their term, the villagers walked in and saw them off. Maybe they are not the best teachers, but they are the greatest people. Instead of the protagonist being a genius all over the world, when they graduate and achieve great success, the protagonist is a so-called famous teacher who has many friends and friends, and no one comes and goes! And the one left by the protagonist, a student from a school, was working in the wind and rain on the construction site and in the fields. During the break, they were talking about what awesome students so-and-so taught, so-and-so was my schoolmate... Maybe, they would say, what would have happened if so-and-so had taught us? If the protagonist knew what they said, he would definitely say in his heart: Haha! Scumbag!

No matter how powerful the training is, it has nothing to do with how much money the protagonist has. It has nothing to do with the protagonist if he wants to go to middle school, high school, or college. Besides, the protagonist is so good that he still works as a support teacher 🤭

There is an essential difference between teaching and volunteer teaching. Teaching is a job. Volunteer teaching supports education in poor areas. Poor students and bad children will receive more care. My uncle's personal experience is that even the tuition fees are paid for. Therefore, volunteer teaching is not only a job, but also a kind of responsibility and a kind of dedication. My grandfather's generation and my parents' generation gave it to me. People have said that those who become volunteer teachers have determination, perseverance, and perseverance. Because of the environment and treatment issues, many people do not have that determination, which means giving up room for advancement, and being a volunteer teacher often lasts a lifetime. Therefore, my parents' generation still respects those elderly people who serve as volunteer teachers, but today's teachers don't even think about it.

After reading many of your comments, I roughly understand why so many people are so violent. This is because teaching as a volunteer teacher is a very sacred profession. Teaching as a volunteer is a spontaneous behavior that is not motivated by the desire to make a backward place rich. They go there so that everyone in a backward place can have enough food and clothing and make the whole village rich. It sounds like a lofty ideal, but many people are disgusted that Pig's Knuckle only pays attention to geniuses and not ordinary people. Ordinary people have many talents that have not been studied, but they can have many other talents. To get rich by raising pigs and fish, it depends on whether someone can guide them. Do you rely on mountains to eat mountains, and rely on water to drink water? Have you noticed this, Pig Jiao? Just favoring geniuses and academic performance. Is supporting education just for academic performance? Is it so that no one can discover geniuses in backward areas? It is to allow them to become independent and make a fortune on their own.

The protagonist is not suitable for teaching. First of all, geniuses are all over the place, and secondly, you can't teach guerrilla warfare by changing positions in one shot, staying in one place for a year or two. You will only have 50 students in your life. If you don't care about it, retreat.

This system is not suitable for supporting education. It is suitable for the protagonist. His father is the director of a high-end private education group, and Zhujie is the director of the admissions office and an instructor of an elite society.

The essence of support education is universal education, and the essence of this system is elite education. This is in itself a conflict. Regardless of whether you are utilitarian or not, based on this essential difference, you should not write about support education. If you write about ordinary teachers in other places, they are better than this.