The Point-Fixing Coach

You really don't understand basketball but dare to write basketball articles? Hand checks weren't even abolished in the '97 season, and you're already pushing small-ball ideas? I think you're just asking for trouble.

Without god-like three-point shooters like the Splash Brothers, it was still the era where people relied on three-point tactics to win championships. OK combination, they can actually solve it with a single shark-slaying move. This is an experienced author, but how come the writing is so...?

What the hell is "David Tyron"? You're writing about NBA coaches, and you create an original player?! It's completely unrealistic and insults the reader's intelligence. A minor player is fine, but creating an original Shaq-level player is just awful. Goodbye...

It started strong but then declined, getting worse and worse; it even seems to have been deliberately made less intelligent.

They've probably started using a new alias! This one's useless.

Is this a book written by an established author? It's just a rambling account.

I don't know what to say. It feels like the author is writing worse and worse. Is he going to write a book that he then abandons?

The rhythm is off quite badly. However, as a veteran author, one should still maintain professional ethics. Although it's so badly damaged, repairs are basically impossible. But to respect the readers, there still has to be an ending. To put it simply, I'll just bury myself in writing for two days, finish this season's story, and give it an ending.

I think this should be over. Players around 90% of the way through the NBA playoffs are trash. You've been "Hack-a-Shaq" from start to finish, do you think you're the league commissioner?!

🙂🙂🙂🙂