The Power of an Entire Nation

Many people are very puzzled by the protagonist's behavior of not wanting to be served, not wanting to be called master, etc. I will give a unified answer here. The theme of this book is anti-aristocratic, that is, the protagonist wants to eliminate the aristocracy. While eliminating nobles, do not become nobles. What is the core of this book? It is clearly written at the end of Chapter 12, which is to break the aristocratic class and achieve relative equality The protagonist's behavioral logic is based on this. I'm curious. Why do many people think that the protagonist should be superior to others, and superiority to talents is the ultimate pursuit. While shouting to break the oppressor, I want to become the oppressor at the same time. Take this for granted. If the protagonist's behavioral logic is really the same as that of a noble, to form a monopoly and bully others, then why is he fighting? This book is a cool novel. The protagonist will also pretend to slap in the face, but the pretending to slap in the face is based on reasonable behavioral logic. Not all pussy should be faked, and not all faces should be slapped. To quote "Zhang Mazi", fairness, fairness, is the fairness of the stars. Let me add a few words about equality and fairness. Fairness has fair opportunities and fair results. Some people ask if it is fair to work hard and get the same money as others. This refers to the fairness of the results. It can even be extended to the problem of on-demand allocation. Fairness in this book roughly refers to fairness of opportunity, that is, everyone will have the opportunity to create a better future through hard work. Equality includes relative equality and absolute equality. People are different and have differences, so we must maintain basic human rights, such as equality in life safety. Don't use extreme and extreme examples to refute the whole. There is not a single sentence in the whole article that is absolute. One final word. The background of this book is similar to the Victorian era. Do you know the concept of inequality in it? People are commodities! Many people don't understand. I will add something in the end. What is the pursuit of equality? It is because of inequality that we pursue equality. Also, what motivates ZB and makes people work hard and make money is differentiation, not class. Differences can be smoothed away, but class inequality cannot be smoothed away. … It's not clear why the subject of this book has caused so much controversy. Isn't it normal for the protagonist in a novel to change the world? The protagonist of this book just changes the world without becoming a person in this world. While defeating the oppressor, do not become the oppressor. This is the most common and normal concept! I can't figure out what's wrong.

Do you think I am the only one who posts book reviews in the book review section? Actually, I am the only one who rewards. Do you think I'm the only one giving rewards? In fact, most of the collections are robots. Do you think most of the collections are robots? Actually, many of the recommendation votes are issued by me myself. Do you think no one sprayed me? Actually, I deleted all the comments that criticized me.

I haven't read the book, but the author's thoughts on fairness and justice are very good. Those who say it's impossible all the time, kneel down when they see an official, cannot afford to go to school, cannot afford to eat, and work like slaves, is this the life they want?

The protagonist wants to eliminate the nobility and achieve equality for everyone. The problem is that if you eliminate the nobility, you will be the aristocrat, and your subordinates will be the minor nobility. This cannot be changed. Anyone who understands understands it.

I really like it, I hope more people can watch it

People have traveled through time and are still so useless. Now it's the country that begs you, not you. If the country wants to punish you, it must be able to punish you.

What can you do in five minutes? Study technology? Come on, compulsory education takes nine years. Five minutes is enough to make a fool of yourself.

After reading the introduction, I will ask 1. Can the protagonist go back? Or was he very powerful in the original world, so he would still listen to him even if he had traveled through time and could not return to the country? 2. Can the protagonist mail back things from this world? (Such as elixirs, spiritual stones, magic stones, etc.) 3. Can the magic and martial arts in this world (that's what they are like anyway) be used in the original world? . . . In short, if the protagonist becomes stronger in this world, what benefits can it bring to the original world? It can make the whole country of the original world help him.

This kind of article is not that easy to write. The author's own IQ is the sum of the IQs of all the people in the work. He wants to write a think tank with the power of the whole country, emmm.

This kind of book is difficult to write. If the author does not have a large amount of knowledge reserves and rich experience, what he writes is completely self-indulgent.