True Immortality

This protagonist's outlook is extremely incorrect! As a principal, when human beings are facing foreign enemies, I am teaching students the so-called "steadiness" and teaching them to escape! In his speech, he openly mocked those who shed their blood for mankind as stupid! Do you call this "stable"? Your spine has been broken!

As an invulnerable boss, I could resist it before, but when it came to the system, I really couldn't resist it. Countless people are fighting for you on the front line, and you can easily become the savior, but because you don't want to lose the so-called preciousness, you turn a blind eye to the countless people who have sacrificed their lives for you, and continue to be stable at the back. The most important thing is that if you don't bind it, forget it. The article actually mentions that if your life is in danger, you will choose to bind the system. This is true selfishness reaching its limit. Even racial crises are not as important as personal lives.

Without these "idiots", who would give you time to stabilize? If the frontline soldiers were "smart people". "General, the enemy has arrived at the front line" "It's a fool to fight even though you know you can't defeat it. You have to keep the green hills and don't worry about running out of firewood, so you can retreat to the next base." "The enemy continues to pursue you, general." . . "General, there is a city behind us" "Withdraw" "General, we are the only ones left" "We still can't fight, in order to preserve the fire of mankind, I decided to surrender" In the end, all the fools died, and the smart people survived. Many years later, the general found a note in a certain human ruins "It's just a little bit close. As long as the frontline soldiers delay for a while, it will be..." The general smiled and shook his head, "It's a fool to fight when you know you can't beat me. I won't be a fool"

Suddenly I remembered General Feng Yong, the eldest son of the warlord Feng Delin. He believed that the main reason for China's internal and external troubles was industrial backwardness. "To rejuvenate the country through industry, we must first cultivate talents." Therefore, Feng Yong took out almost all of the Feng family's property and founded Feng Yong University in Shenyang at his own expense on August 8, 1927, which was founded during the Anti-Japanese War. He did not teach his students to run away when resisting invasion, but to fight bravely. After the school was occupied and destroyed by the invaders, he continued to preside over the affairs of Fengyong University. On November 1, 1931, the Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army of Fengyong University was sworn in and established. On January 28, 1932, the Shanghai-Shanghai Anti-Japanese War started. Feng Yong, the exiled Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army of Feng Yong University, went to Shanghai to participate in position propaganda and rescue work. In early 1933, the Japanese army attacked Jehol Province, and Feng Yong led his students to Chengde to participate in the anti-Japanese war. I don't say whether the protagonist wants to do this, but he can't teach students to do that. Everyone wants to run away, so who will move forward? Even in the book Big Brother, did the protagonist just avoid and run away? Did he run away when the enemy attacked the mountain gate? There are some things you don't have to do, but you can't laugh at them

After reading the final summary of the first chapter, there is one thing that really makes me unhappy! Teach others not to fight the Zerg of the same level, but to avoid it and kill the Zerg of a lower level than you. However, if you don't stop the Zerg at the same level as you, who will? Ah? Someone one level below you? Or do you let people of the same level as you risk their own lives to fight one against two? Yes, after you avoid the Zerg at the same level as you, you can kill a hundred Zerg that are one level lower than you. But have you ever thought that because you avoided the Zerg of the same level, it can also kill a hundred humans one level lower than it? Isn't this still one life for one? Why don't you block the Zerg of the same level and fight back while retreating to the defense line, relying on your position to fight? In the final analysis, it is not about teaching people to be selfish. Even if it means sacrificing fellow humans, they must save their own lives in order to enjoy fame and fortune. Because there will be other people on the front line who don't care about their own safety and want to protect others even if they die. Because they are full of passion and are not afraid of strong enemies. They will fight with the same level, and even fight across levels if necessary, just to protect those who have no fighting power in the rear, or just delay the progress of the Zerg to gain time for the rear to arrange arrangements.

The novel is based on a funny theory. —I can't teach students martial arts, because if they have the ability, they will be drafted to fight locusts. ? ? ? I will not say whether you should stand up when the country is in crisis. After all, this is a personal choice and there are differences in division of labor. But when the nest is overturned, are there any eggs left? Everyone's health is improving, but alien creatures are coming to attack. Is this something that the government and the army can handle? This is a disaster facing all mankind. In this situation, those who know martial arts at least have some ability to protect themselves and can protect their loved ones, but what about those who don't know martial arts? How did the author establish this kind of sandbox point of view and still be so complacent? Recently many novels are based on Shen Yong's animation, but Shen Yong's caution is because he was too reckless in his previous life, so he will be cautious and prepared in this life. Being cautious is for protection and to destroy the enemy, not for the sake of being wise and protecting oneself. The little Japan you often make fun of all has such correct views. What about you authors? Bah!

This book is boring to read. I have had the system for more than 60 years and still haven't figured out anything. I worry about it all day long. I also worry about being bound to the system and becoming someone else's puppet. Is it so popular nowadays to write characters where the protagonist is afraid of death? If it sounds good, it means being steady, but if it sounds bad, it means that I am afraid of death. I worry about myself getting into an accident every day.

After retreating, the Stable Character Classic has come out. Even if it belongs to a new style of writing, it is still wrong. And as an immortal, after watching "Senior Brother" and "Zhou Dongdong (Three Bowls)", I really have no desire to continue watching. The writing is indeed okay, but the plot... True thoughts, don't criticize!

I originally wanted to join the army, and I also wanted to protect my family and my country, just like the revolutionary martyrs learned from me. However, after reading this book by the author, even though I haven't finished it, the first two chapters have already blown my mind. I now have some doubts about life. According to the author's theory, Regardless of whether when the United States comes and we feel that we can't fight, we can be more cautious and surrender directly, or if we find that the fire is too big and dangerous, we can be more cautious and let the fire burn down. If we rush to put out the fire, we are stupid and unsound, right? I hope the author can help answer my doubts. Thank you. I will read a few chapters later to understand the author's thoughts in depth and then come back to ask questions. Thank you. If you disturb the author or anyone in the book review area, please inform me to delete the post. I will first say sorry to everyone.

I read the comments section before reading this book. After all, I don't have the right to speak without research on the novel I'm reading. So I read it. First of all, the word "stable" is mentioned. The character of the protagonist is stable, but how the author describes it, the driving, the building, and the airplane part, it is really crazy. I was a little persuaded to quit this part. This is not stable, it is really sick. As for the question mentioned in the comment area, what the author actually wants to express is to act steadily and kill the enemy! But what is the real situation? The protagonist is so afraid of death and has never been on the battlefield. Why should he call those passionate people stupid? You really think that others are brainless and just rush forward. Don't others know how to conserve their strength to kill the enemy? In fact, what the protagonist said is right, but you are wrong in that you have not considered that the spirit of fighting the enemy bravely is needed on the battlefield. This spirit is needed, but you did not say it out and include all the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the country. That's why people get trolled. In an era where I have the strength but my body and mind are still young and have not adapted to this era, it is really disappointing and this is also a big shortcoming. Having said so much, if you have overlooked these points, you can also read it.