He Changed France

The financial bourgeoisie is in power in Orleans... It would be damned if the cabinet were all bankers.

Not bad. There are really few people writing about France. They are all insulting the law. Funny

What do you want me to write about the political attitude of France and how to carry out reforms? What are the obstacles to reform? Is there another saying that is reckless and only talks about international grand strategy without considering all actual situations?

I'm just writing this. Have you ever read the global general history of France's modern history? Napoleon's coup established the First French Empire and replaced it with the French Republic. After several anti-French wars, the First Empire was restored by the Bourbon royal family. Napoleon returned to Paris and established the Second French Empire. However, 100 days later, he encountered Waterloo and the French revolution failed completely. Napoleon was imprisoned by the British on a small island in the Atlantic Ocean and imprisoned for life. The Bourbon royal family was restored again! Twenty years later, another revolution occurred in France. With the support of big capitalists, Napoleon's nephew Napoleon III ascended the throne of France, and the French Revolution was established.

I hope the author will continue to write more. There are not many foreign historical articles.

From the bottom of my heart, I dislike Western white people even more than Japanese people!

... Why did the title of this book change? You are not like the author of "He Changed Rome" who frequently publishes monthly updates and delays them until the editor is too lazy to read them.

Historically, although Napoleon III was a weakling militarily, his political level could be said to be unparalleled.

Several issues (in no particular order): ①France without the Rhineland does not have a complete large-scale industrial system ②The concentration of industry in Paris is strategically disadvantageous when it is subject to external interference ③The stability of Paris citizens in the revolutionary area (and world thought) ④Greater French thought and Spain, Italy, and the Lowlands ⑤Agricultural problems and the birth rate problems they cause ⑥The strategic idea of carving up Africa ⑦Gibro Tudor and the separated French Navy ⑧Interference in the United States and Canada ⑨Suez and Egypt ⑩Central America and the Canal 11 Fragile Ottoman, increasingly powerful Tsarist Russia, Castle (Crimean War) 12 Asia that is not southwest, north and central Asia (including southeast) 13 Technology tree and the second industrial revolution 14 Military technology (power, processing, mathematical physics) 15 Agriculture Industrial science and technology (fertilizers and pesticides) 16 Current medical thought, equipment and drugs 17 Finance, economy, out of reality 18 Railways and rules, whether Paris is the center 19 Industrial development and focus 20 Mobilization mechanism 21 Military and political officer training system and its loyalty 22 Diplomacy and long-term strategy 23 The country's zbism (with the removal of this " "The" one) Another: 1 Intervention in the Balkans, focusing on the position 2 Central Germany 3 Nordic Europe itself and its relationship with Prussia and Russia 4 Britain's two-power standard 5 Italy and unification 6 Spain's future chaos 7 Culture and civilization (internal and external) 8 Nation and country (internal and external) 9 Thoughts and ideas 10 Educational reform? Don't change? Relationship and status with the church

The last few chapters have been very uncomfortable to read. Let me give you my personal opinion. Women can write, but if they are not good at writing, they should write less. It is really discouraging.

The pace is too slow, the plot is too drawn out, it feels like reading historical documents, there are too many narrative chapters, it is really smelly and long. The June Revolution is an important node and needs to be rewritten, but the way you write it is very annoying. I'm not here to learn the history of the French June Revolution, I'm just here to read a historical novel about time travellers. Some things should be brief, and it is only right to get into the topic as much as possible. Slip away, gone away

This book is curious, I just saw the main character at St. Cyr's School. The previous plot was dragged out in various ways, with no distinction between priorities and basically no perspective of the protagonist. When it came to taking San as the leader, it was just brushed off. Shouldn't the protagonist and the things around the protagonist be the ** part? It's all covered in one stroke... The background shaping of party struggle was described in a long way... Did you copy the information from somewhere? The writing is so weird

He changed China (funny)

It can be said that France has re-emerged and taken off in an unprecedented way. Just looking at the people's living standards, national finance and economy, and colonial construction, you will find that its ability to govern the country is far superior to that of any previous French rulers. However, because of the populist tradition of France (Paris), no matter how good any king or government is, as long as it is defeated, the people will not give him a chance to regroup and take revenge. Only Napoleon has had more than two chances in history, and it is entirely because he has more victories than failures that the people are willing to believe in him. The protagonist should quickly enter the military academy, but should he study infantry or cavalry? Could it be the ancestral artillery?

At the beginning, when the protagonist was blackmailed after making money, the author just wrote it blindly. The royal family would not be so direct, and the protagonist donated half of his property when he was frightened. He also promised that Britain would not interfere with the protagonist's father becoming French Emperor. Only a fool would believe the guarantee. The more chaotic France is to the British, the better. If they are afraid of spreading revolution, they should have spread it long ago. They believe everything European troublemakers say. The protagonist's IQ is worrying.

I remember that if I wrote a little something oriental, it would be 404. Wouldn't it be better to cancel China? Mentioning Dongfang will result in 404, so don't write too much about Dongfang.