Supreme Tycoon

The only objectionable thing about this book is probably the protagonist's father, who is foolishly loyal, loves to brag, is too face-saving, and likes to objectively evaluate people based on their age rather than their abilities. The first point can be said to be determined by culture and the times. The fourth point, although it gradually gets better in the future, the protagonist's father always has to be tough and teach the protagonist a lesson before he implements it. This reality is normal, because a person's shortcomings are also his cuteness, but in novels and novels, such a father will make readers feel a little hindered, making readers feel that without this father, the protagonist should be able to kill everyone faster. Every reader assumes the role of the protagonist, and it is impossible to accept the feelings of the protagonist's father... Generally, as a son, filial piety is necessary, but if you prevent the reader from enjoying it, your father will also spray it on you. On the other hand, for a person like the protagonist's father, if the protagonist is not reborn, will he live in the shadow of his father's power all his life? Is this kind of father not a good father in some way?

It's really disgusting for readers. The protagonist's mother is told every day that studying is the right thing to do. The protagonist's father always talks about how ambitious the protagonist is, or that the protagonist's idea has been used, and also tells the protagonist to leave it alone, because he knows it well. Hehe

Is it a joke to engage in scientific research with Lenovo? There are also investments with Li Ka-shing.

Fourth brother, come on! A new book has been published, congratulations on the new book!

This book should be better if it incorporates more emotional elements!

Why do we need a school plot? Just start the game at 18 years old, graduate, what do you want to do? Are you writing a school plot with hundreds of chapters?

The richer you are in China, the more you need to start an industry, and it is best to open a factory. As long as the main business of making money is there, even if you are losing money, you can open as many workers as you can. That's right.

Therefore, I would like to advise all authors to write novels. It is best for the main character to have both parents dead, no brothers and sisters, no relatives and friends, or an orphan with family, relatives and friends. Good writing can be the icing on the cake. If not, don't blame readers for criticizing you. It's just fun to read novels. You also wrote about such a troublesome pair of parents and a bunch of troublesome relatives.

It's boring, the protagonist is too frustrated, the protagonist's parents are too strict, the author may be a mama's boy in reality! The novel has completely lost its excitement, poisonous weed!

The protagonist's parents really persuaded him to quit. They obviously listened to the protagonist's opinions, but they still pretended to tell him to "read a book, don't get in the way, and ask you to teach me something." Oh my God, it gives people a headache. What's the point of writing this? This is obviously an entrepreneurial novel. What does writing this have to do with the main plot? What does it have to do with the father? Removing all these aspects of the relationship between mother and father will not affect my understanding of this book (of course it will lose a lot of water, after all, there are only more than 800 chapters in total). Family relationships are inherently a big pit. If it is not handled well, it will make people feel embarrassed. The author also takes the initiative to jump into the pit. Why do so many authors directly write orphan protagonists? Are they fools? No, they have just been criticized too much by readers and have learned the lesson!