The Final Swarm

There are several setting problems: 1. For the Zerg, matter = energy = nutrition But, E=mc², if pure matter can be regarded as energy, according to the description in the book, where does the excess energy go? 2. 100% Digestion of Zerg There is nothing wrong with 100% digestion, but non-organic matter cannot be decomposed into energy and other compounds In other words, after eating, some excess inorganic matter will still be excreted, rather than nothing coming out (Currently, the feces of most organisms contain organic matter and inorganic matter, and decomposers decompose organic matter) 3. Predator civilization What is a predator? I think they are those civilizations that do not have their own scientific research capabilities, and the level of science and technology depends on who they robbed And the protagonist in the article uses human nuclear fusion to do this The Zerg itself does not have nuclear fusion or similar technology This means that the output of the negative core mother worm is limited to humans 4. No need to consume Negative Nuclear Mother Worm As we all know, even nuclear fusion requires "fuel", such as tritium, etc. There are many types of nuclear fusion, ranging from severe to severe Because nuclear fusion generally can only fuse to the iron stage But there are also some works that will have more powerful nuclear fusion. It can continue to fuse after iron It is said that the energy of the planetary engine in "The Wandering Earth" is produced by the fusion of heavy nuclei (so it can "burn" stones) Some of my thoughts About the first point: Separate the roles of inorganic matter and organic matter (energy), for example: Puppy 1 grid of energy 0.01 Grid of inorganic matter (can be refined) Nuclear fission mother worm 1000 grids of nutrients 250 grids of inorganic matter 50 grids of uranium (i. E. Special resources) Inorganic matter is necessary to constitute living things, or is a commonly used inorganic matter Uncommonly used ones can be separated (such as Uranium) About the second point: Excretion is understandable, and it can also promote material circulation Isn't it beautiful? About the third point: Since we have robbed so many top-notch human beings, it is time to let them play their role (sure About the fourth point: It is normal to have consumption, the original Zerg also consumes nutrients But some things are not needed by all species It's necessary, isn't it? Points: Most of them are discussing the role of settings with me It is recommended to move to another post This is mainly about some basic settings The above

A group of sages passed by~Congratulations on the opening of the new book~

"Inscription placeholder. Jpg" Statement: This is a discussion about the setting role of literary works. If you have good opinions, please put them forward. After all, this is my family's opinion. Text 1 (setting function part): The settings of the work can be divided into many types For example: world view, society, characters The first: world view For example, the setting of the basic situation of the world (whether it is a magic world or a technological world, or both) If it is a magic world, what is the mechanism for realizing magic? (More in-depth) In addition to the world type, there are also settings for the size of the world (universe or pancontinent-like), etc. Some people may have questions, what is the use of such detailed settings? The biggest advantage of detailed setting is that it is rigorous For example, I set the protagonist to move on a planet, but did not set the land and sea location The result is that a hundred chapters ago, area A was on the east side of area B, and now it suddenly became the south side of area B. (My other post is an in-depth discussion of the world view. It seems to be talking about the Zerg, but in fact it means that the Zerg does not conform to the basic world view) Second: Society Social setting is also a very important component Is it a utopia or a dystopia? Is it a lost empire or a new civilization? These also have a sublimation effect on the work (Similarly, society can also be brought to life) (Amway is included below) The book "Sword of the Dawn" has a very good definition of society, and basically makes readers really feel the closure. The degeneration of a feudal society is not simply a description of people not having enough to eat (Of course, this requires the author to have the ability to control) If Big Eyeball's definition of feudal society is unclear, there is even only one definition: feudal system Then It is impossible to write such a good society Third: Character setting Character setting is the setting that everyone likes to see now, "the protagonist is an orphan" Character setting basically determines the high-level direction of a book If No matter how outstanding the underlying world view setting and social setting are but the character setting is bland and even unsightly then that book cannot be a god Reasonable character setting and reasonable plot, these are the parts that most readers read For example, he is obviously the smartest person in the world, but as soon as he meets the protagonist, he suddenly becomes stupid. Then this violates the reasonable character setting and the reasonable plot, so it becomes a poisonous point And the setting of the world view and the setting of society can reduce the probability of this situation ( Reasonable) Text 2 (for the author's part in writing the book): Although the setting is very important but not everyone can consider it thoughtfully. After all, people will always make omissions And there are also authors Neither the knowledge base nor the imagination is enough to support him to make extremely detailed settings Then for the author, they can choose a more clever method For example, for the setting of a certain planet continent Set the tilt angle and rotation Direction, distance from stars to extend the climate of this planet, this is not something that an ordinary author can do Then just omit these and directly set the continental outline, terrain and climate And it is not necessary to set everything For example, if If the protagonist comes into contact with a society (and it is a close contact), then it is necessary to set the society in detail But if the protagonist comes into contact with a society (such as the pioneer civilization) through books and relics, then it is not a problem to set vague points Similarly, for a walk-on, there is no need to clearly explain the other person's family tree, but for the protagonist and the protagonist's good friends, setting up the family tree (such as parents, relatives, etc.) Is still conducive to writing Kou Hu Yi (a message to the author): The following are all Kou Hu About a book, the relationship between the setting and the plot is not who serves whom But both should be paid equal attention to. As a book, if an inexplicable character is added for a certain plot The setting Then the logic and rationality (or completeness) of the whole book will be reduced In this era where there are so many novices, there is a high chance that this book will be useless If it focuses on the setting, the plot may not be connected. This will also result in the loss of a lot of votes However, these two situations are mostly caused by thinking about the plot outline first and then adding the settings in detail So my suggestion is: If you write the plot outline first, it is recommended to try your best While improving the setting, you must also consider the impact on the plot If the outline is not detailed enough to be affected by the setting , then you must make changes as soon as possible (Actually, I don't really believe that someone writes the plot outline first and then works on the setting) (To be added) Key points: The author must not simply copy other people's settings and use them Especially if they are not clear or understand This may be harmful It may have the opposite effect Of course, if you understand it, you can still learn from it It is still not recommended to use it directly. After all, this may cause problems with the original settings, which will eventually lead to less and less rigorous (completeness) Above

Are you going to die if you keep raising them? It's really not easy to find a book that suits your appetite, and with the current speed of updates, it's also easy to get bored. Do you think you can survive this life?

Isn't it a bit putting the cart before the horse that the protagonist doesn't seize the time to improve the strength of the insect swarm, but instead starts raising pigs to control humans? Although the author has explained it, it is very weak. Why does this kind of opening become useless instead of improving the strength? And it was a bit uncomfortable to raise bugs for people to eat. I felt that the protagonist did not regard himself as a bug, but just a person who controlled the power of the bugs. He does not regard the Zerg as his race, just his strength. This is not a poisonous point, but can he stop pretending to be for the Zerg or something? And are the scientists tied up by the protagonist just to watch him brag, forcing the audience? Why do those people controlled by insects have their own consciousness? Some people would say that they are engaged in scientific research, but can't the protagonist absorb their memory fragments? What use do they have? Bragging? The core technical protagonist can control the Zerg by himself, but it is impossible for these people to come into contact with the Zerg technology. How strange? I hope that the protagonist can be down-to-earth, have ulterior motives as high as the sky, have strong strength, and dream of ruling the human race. Can you look at the gap between you and others? If you want to rule humans, you should first study what to feed them. If you want to rule bugs, first study a clone of human flesh for them to eat, and then say "I want to rule xx" is as childish. It is empty talk without force, and the protagonist is a king bug, so you have to consider the entire Zerg race. If you don't really like it, who would type so many words for you at night? Some suggestions, the author should write according to his own ideas, I can't read them according to my own ideas

- "I have personally seen humans use nuclear fusion to release a stream of high-energy particles, pass through a distance of astronomical units, and directly cover and kill tens of thousands of Zerg with powerful firepower. Think about it, that is a carpet bombing of fusion weapons!" - "Could it be..." - "I'm talking about drying the quilt."

Infected people feel that there is no future, and it looks awkward. It would be great to imitate the Zerg in the interstellar world. Find someone with potential to transform it to help the Zerg evolve. Abathur is the best example. Leave all low-level bugs to it. The protagonist needs to transform some heroic units. For example, if you steal the battleships of the human race and re-develop the plan in a new place, you can write about other races and contact the captured king insects to learn more about the world view. Is there any need to mix humans and insects? The strength will be lost 🤫

At present, the plot of this book is not very good. It mainly consists of two plots. The main line is starting to become confusing and the focus is uncertain. I personally think that the main focus of the book in the early stage is between the human race and the Zerg. It is better to start to develop Faerun as a foreshadowing later.

What about cheating? It looks good, eunuch 😅😅

So sad, I have been waiting for months for this book. As a result, I was so angry at the finale that I wanted to send the author a razor blade. Ah i hate