Regulus Decides to Quit Being a Saint Seiya

The protagonist depends on what he likes and dislikes. After Naruto Uzumaki became Hokage and was busy every day, there would be a problem for him. Who doesn't do anything every day but stays at home with his wife and children? He also said that Boruto is pitiful. Boruto is a standard second generation, how pitiful is it? Just because his father is busy, father and son have a cold war. Everyone in the village knew how Naruto was when he was a child. Naruto is still so optimistic every day. I want to ask how pitiful Boruto is. Boruto has both parents and a lovely sister. His father is Hokage and his grandfather is the head of the Hyuga clan. How can he be pitiful? Boruto is just ignorant. Himawari is even younger than him and is more sensible than him. Himawari is not like Boruto.

Reading the comments, it was said that the protagonist killed the Bone King who had just traveled to the past, and then a bunch of people started arguing about what was right and wrong. First of all, let me tell you the personal information of the Bone King who just traveled through time. The Bone King turns out to be an Earthling (nothing wrong with him, right?), And he didn't do many bad things in his previous life (the law is there, and he's still a homebody. The most important thing is that he doesn't have the strength to do bad things). Then he was killed by the protagonist as soon as he traveled through time. What crime did he commit? I sorted out most people's comments, and then raised a counter question Crime 1: He is a non-human being - if so, then no matter he was a good person or a saint, he would have to die in a flesh and blood body? Just because the blood flowing in his body is not that blood? Crime 2: What will happen to him in the future? He has no humanity and kills innocent people indiscriminately. I wrote an essay about the protagonist who will be worse than a pig or a dog in the future. He will kill relatives and friends. Is it okay for the protagonist to commit suicide? Things that haven't happened yet (the human nature of the old bone who just traveled through time has disappeared?), Are they directly defined by one's own subjective definition? Is human life so cheap? Or is it that only the Bone King becomes a girl and is qualified to be "rescued" and "guided" by the protagonist? Crime 3: He has a lot of evil people under his command. If the protagonist takes action against those people, the bones will inevitably conflict with the protagonist. There is no difference - indeed, but if you think about this "process", wouldn't it be much better? And there wouldn't be so many people talking about this? Sin 4: The Bone King's sins are extremely heinous, and this is how the character of the game is set! ――… Let me ask you a question, if your game character has a red name, are you a murderer in the real world? Crime 5: You said that the Bone King will not be inhumane in the future, and you have to wait until he kills someone in the future before solving the problem? ―Look, everyone who asked this question knows that the Bone King was not that "evil" at first, so why can't he be guided? Help him please influence? Just because he's not cute? A skeleton? Sin 6: He is a virtual character. How the protagonist defines his life and death is correct. You virgin bitches are so caring, why don't you care about your neighbors and relatives? ——I won't refute you. I just want to say that the Bone King is a fictional character, but the protagonist is also the same. They are all false. So where does the high and low come from? Since they are all of the same class, then they are all equal. Since they are equal, how can the protagonist be qualified to represent justice (laughing)? ――The author's justice (laughing)?

According to the author's setting of the protagonist of this book, you should also kill your goddess Athena. First, she and Hera launched the Trojan War. Second, she is a god, not a human. Come on, author, the conditions you want have been gathered. Kill her quickly and let me see if the protagonist you set is so principled.

Sure enough, based on your thoughts, it's strange that this book is popular. Using your own thoughts to judge whether other people are righteous or not is the biggest sin.

I feel that people outside the group chat are not treated as human beings in this novel. When it comes to changing memories, it is replaced by research, which completely ignores the feelings and wishes of the parties involved 😅😅

Everyone has their own way of living, so I won't say anything more. I will simply express my opinion on the protagonist, Bone Killer King. This is a typical act of killing someone for an unfounded crime. Simply denying or approving a person based on his future is narrow-minded and extremely stupid. What are the consequences of this? That is to refuse to understand, especially to refuse to understand whether this object has the possibility of transformation, possibility of salvation, and possibility of salvation. This will push the people who can be won over, who can be reformed, who can be saved, to the opposite side. And most importantly, a crisis of confidence. The Bone King will lose his humanity in the end not just because he becomes an undead after traveling through time, but also because for Suzuki Satoru, there is not much in the real world that is worthy of nostalgia for him. He is an orphan and in reality he has no relatives or lovers. On the contrary, the guild Ainz Ooal Gown in the game gave Suzuki Satoru more nostalgia and a sense of home. Even though Suzuki Satoru had considered the issue of guardian betrayal after traveling through time, in fact Suzuki Satoru regarded the guild and these guardians as more important than himself. It can be said that Suzuki Satoru, because he was born an orphan and has experienced a lot, values ​​family ties more than his own feelings. His sense of belonging is actually determined by family ties. So when Suzuki Satoru and the Great Tomb of Nazarick came to another world, this became the only thing he valued, and the only things he valued were all made of inhumans, and these could make him feel family affection. The biggest reason why Suzuki Satoru loses his humanity is because his sense of belonging is inhuman, not because his nature is evil. Suzuki Satoru, who is just in the stage of time travel, can be saved, reformed, and won over. And the protagonist just killed Suzuki Satoru based on his future behavior and his own reasons for being happy or unhappy? As for giving Suzuki Satoru a chance, he let it go as long as he accepted surveillance? I just want to say that the protagonist is really a genius at negotiating. A person who has no bad deeds in the past, just because of the future, he has the attitude that you will be monitored 24 hours a day, and if you don't accept it, you will die. Are you sure you're here to negotiate? That's right, the protagonist never thought about negotiation, the protagonist is here to kill people. This is just like the U. S. Imperialists attacking Iraq with a bottle of soapy water and claiming that they have chemical weapons. They are determined to kill and have never thought of taking other routes. By the way, some people say they would vote to kill Wang Wang when he met him in his youth. Some people would kill him without even thinking because he would betray the revolution in the future. I want to say that. The joke of the British referendum is still just around the corner. I never thought about what it would mean to kill a passionate young man who was still passionate and could give up his life for the country.

It seems that the Saint in your novel is just a self-righteous scumbag. If something that a person will definitely do in the future is used as evidence of guilt. Then it means that he who makes such a judgment is also such a person. If you put people on trial and kill an innocent person directly. This means that this person is not worthy of being a saint. Even his own behavior is committing a crime. This thing does not make sense in any country or world. As for voting to decide a person's life or death, especially minors with incomplete views should also participate in this kind of life-and-death trial. I can only say that allowing these minors to vote, neither this nor these voting is a good thing. This is no longer a question of whether you like the character or not, or whether you don't want the character to live or die. This is an article with very unhealthy views. And the logic is different and inconsistent with common sense.

Although Naruto in Boruto does neglect his family because of his job as Hokage, this does not mean that Naruto does not care about them. There is also a scene in the side story of Naruto using his shadow clone to play with Boruto. Although it is hard to see it, it is Naruto's shadow clone. It can be said that it takes a moment to catch Boruto, but Naruto let the shadow clone fight with Boruto for so long. In addition, the use of the shadow clone is very tiring, and the shadow clone may look like the original body, but it is not the original body after all. Important decisions about the village cannot be left to the shadow clone. This is not as simple as stamping a seal and signing the name as the author said. If the shadow clone were to handle such things, Naruto would not become Hokage. . Next, there is the matter of Naruto neglecting his family. After the incident of Momoshiki's attack, Naruto began to make up for his family and spend more time with them. For example, he accompanied Boruto and Hinata to compensate for Himawari's birthday party, or specially stayed with Boruto to go out, but the performance was not so conspicuous. If Naruto is really what the author said, then he is not Naruto. No matter how you grow up or become mature, your essence will never change.

Why do so many people have a problem with Regulus killing Momonga? It is clear that Momonga is already a "subhuman" regardless of his race or self-perception. For an "alien" who will kill humans on a large scale in the future, what's wrong with directly killing him? Especially the gang of aliens under him, the initial setting of the justice value is extremely evil, that is, the bad and irredeemable type. Of course we have to kill him directly.

Yako Busujima has bloodthirsty tendencies, why can she be understood and purified?