I Made Countless Students Cry During Exams

Can I say that I thought of Ge Jun?

Here's a suggestion for the author: He should stop showing that disdainful attitude towards everyone in the education sector. Showing off and getting slapped in the face is a common trope, but don't write the protagonist like everyone's father. The best approach is to feign composure, quietly relinquish your achievements afterward, and keep your accomplishments hidden.

I never imagined a novel could be written like this. I wonder how much research the author had to do to get this book to its destination. I'm truly impressed. My biggest hope is that the author can finish it smoothly! Thumbs up 👍, it's exceptionally well-written.

Welcome to the series "The Birth of a Father-in-Law," sponsored by Qidian.com.

Having just graduated from high school, I felt this book was insulting to my intelligence after reading just two pages. I can only say don't have any expectations of the novel's educational value. I think the title should be changed to "My Brain Teasers Made Countless People Cry".

A teacher who doesn't consider the students' actual situation and sets difficult problems to make them despair is a small matter. Poor exam results are a minor issue, but students losing confidence and interest in learning is a major issue. He's not afraid of being tied up in a sack and thrown into the river by the parents for misleading students.

As a math teacher, I find your behavior, which drives students to despair, utterly despicable. Do you think Ge Jun has a good reputation among teachers? Wrong. I've spoken with many math teachers, and Ge Jun's actions have caused the downfall of countless mathematical geniuses in China. He is a sinner in the mathematics world, the biggest sinner!

To be honest, the purpose of regular exams is to assess students' understanding, while the college entrance exam is to differentiate students based on their abilities. If a test is full of difficult questions and both top and struggling students score zero, then that exam is invalid.

Ge Jun sets difficult questions to lower the overall educational quality of Jiangsu students and students across the country! Even when the questions are difficult, they are within the knowledge and foundation of Jiangsu students! What you're doing is just showing off, making the questions difficult for the sake of making them difficult! It feels a bit excessive!

Other flaws are mostly tolerable, but several teachers arguing in front of the whole class? And repeatedly saying things like, "What right do you have to be a teacher?"... Are these teachers? Couldn't the villains at least be normal people?