Live Streaming: Master Craftsman

Looking at everyone's discussion about conservatism and innovation, I would like to express my opinion. The old school in Li Zi's article does not refer to the old school in terms of skills. From a purely technical point of view, Zian should be said to be the old school. The so-called innovation is actually an ideological innovation, which can be summarized as the following points: 1. The fusion of skills, integrating various traditional crafts into a new craft, which is difficult to achieve in real life. Yes, because it is impossible for a system to exist in real life; 2. The innovation of the apprenticeship model, teaching without distinction, is actually not an innovation, but should be said to be retro. The modern education model is more reminiscent of the Eight-part Writing Era, cramming education, cookie-cutter education, and teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. This is the educational philosophy of the ancients, and it has basically disappeared in modern society. This is the tragedy of our education! 3. Innovation in the sales model, this can be said to be innovation in the true sense. Relying on the Internet, there was absolutely no such thing in ancient times 🤓 In short, whether it is innovative or conservative, it is just a classification of characters artificially set up by writing novels for the sake of exciting plots. In real life, human nature is full of different shapes. How can innovation and conservatism be distinguished? Don't be too persistent.

If the intention is too high, it will lack reality. Establish a mind for the heaven and earth, establish a destiny for the living people, carry forward the unique teachings of the past saints, and create peace for all generations. It's really awkward to put in an impetuous urban novel.

After reading 465, I have an idea or question that has been answered (Are the Feng family and the Jiang family really considered old-school?) In our usual sense, conservative can be said to be used together with words such as being stubborn and adapting to the past, but in Li Zi's article we see that they are not like this. So who are the real conservatives? I think it's (people like Chongyun) who don't want to make progress and resort to despicable means when people with amazing talents appear (the euphemistic name is polishing the rough jade, but in fact it's flattening their vitality and enterprising spirit) And I think the reason why the Feng family and the Jiang family are "conservative" is because of inheritance. In today's world of advanced machinery, craftsmanship is slowly being worn away, and those who have achieved success are no longer young people. Most of their considerations are how to pass it on so that future generations can still see the crystallization of their ancestors. Although according to their approach, they are gradually being left behind by the times, they feel that at least they have passed it on, even if it may not be passed down for a long time. The appearance of Zian gave the craft a new lease of life. But in their eyes, this unstable foundation is like a rootless tree that disappears in a blink of an eye. As mentioned before, this road is like walking on a tightrope over a cliff and you will be shattered if you are not careful. They didn't dare to put this aside. After all, if they made one wrong move, all their hard work would be wasted. They didn't dare to gamble and couldn't afford it. As for Zian and the others, they cannot be described as innovative. The more appropriate description should be (inheriting the new) to inherit the tradition and create new life, so that the craftsmanship in this era is different from the previous vitality and can be passed on better. Although Zian can be regarded as a lamp, illuminating the way forward, the wick has just been lit at the beginning, and the wind and rain are blowing. No one can judge how far it can go and whether the direction is biased. My humble opinion, corrections welcome

Supplement

It seems that after one or two hundred chapters, I don't dare to agree with the protagonist's thoughts. Is his craft more important than his body? Someone smashed the glass and cut his arm, but he still carved it carefully. Gee, I admire this spirit but I don't agree with it! How can you guarantee that he won't throw another stone just to hit you on the head? And the protagonist actually forgave the person who asked the reporter to slander him in the end? Since everyone is in the craft industry, we should follow the rules passed down by our ancestors. If you say I stole the master, if I didn't, then you will chop it off! The protagonist finally refused. Gee, you are such a serious young man. I feel like the municipal committee lacks a certificate for you as an outstanding citizen! If you want me to say it, it is both a masterpiece and a saint😲! Trouble, please don't write about conflicts with others. You guys are back and forth, contrived and pretentious. The ones who are suffering are the reporters from the UC Shock Department. It's funny.

Personally, I feel that it would be better to start the story with a protagonist who is living a mediocre life in the city without a girlfriend, and then returns to his hometown to take over the ancestral skills. This would be more reasonable. Let's put it this way, in reality, I have never seen a parent who has worked hard to raise his son to become an increasingly successful adult in a big city, and yet is willing to let his child give up his promising future and return to his hometown to become an "ordinary" technician! Why do you say ordinary, because no matter whether your craft is inherited from your family, if you are really good, you will never say that your family background is still like this. Since your craft is ordinary, just accept a good apprentice, why harm your own son? If there is no system, the protagonist will end up being a carpenter in the village. In the end, there is no point in working hard to provide children with education. It is better to learn crafts from primary school 😰

Sister Fenggu, I came from Tieba to support you! Fan you. Support!

It's really poisonous. My sister is 17 years old. She has been bullied. She must be weak. She turns out to be so domineering. She knows more about wood carvings than the protagonist. The protagonist is nearly thirty and used to be a manager. But he can't handle anything when faced with reporters. I wonder how he became a manager. How can he live so long? My sister is 17 years old and silenced reporters. The protagonist can't handle this trivial matter. The heroine is 17 years old and has been bullied but she can handle it. I also accepted it.

I thought that if I survived the first chapter, there would be no cancer. Haha, I was thinking about batches. The most stupid thing is that the readers keep saying poisonous things, but the author still doesn't change and thinks he is right.

Opening another floor, an exclusive era for Buddhist girls