Harry Potter: the Muggles' Counterattack

Author, it's time for some dialogue. There are too many places where you don't have dialogue. There should also be some reaction from Dumbledore.

Common problems in Qidianwen: I must stress in every way how much I miss Chinese food and how unaccustomed I am to eating too much foreign food. Please thank you for traveling through time for 11 years. Secondly, scientific research talents with high IQ must have low emotional intelligence. Can't we write about an ordinary person with high IQ? In fact, the majority are people with high IQ and normal EQ. How many people can you name who have high IQ and low EQ? Or watching the world around you? Moreover, you must be careless with Lolita, either touching her head or pinching her face. Does she have to be so perverted? Or do you usually want to do something to children when you see them?

I feel like the protagonist is so stupid and naive, yet he can still survive being so reckless, and he can indeed play the role of the protagonist 😅

First of all, I want to say that the term Muggle is a rather derogatory term. Basically equivalent to nigger. Wizards use this method because they themselves discriminate against humans. But if you, a human being, use this word, it feels like you are sitting in the wrong position. Second, science and magic cannot actually be compared equally. Magic is just a form of expression, and it should correspond to science and technology rather than science itself. What should really correspond to science is mystery, because magic is based on mystery just like technology is based on science. Third, it is not feasible to use science to explain magic or mystery, because the core of mystery is idealism, and the core of science is materialism. That is to say, if you use science to analyze mystery, you may be able to get a large amount of accurate objective data, but as long as anyone does not admit it, these data will become waste paper because the rules have changed.

I feel that the technology side and the magic side are two different paths. Although they lead to the same goal, until the two lines cross or one of them can stand at a higher angle, they cannot explain the other. Whether it is modern technology or magic in HP, they are all inferior civilizations. This kind of civilization cannot even explain its own origin. How can it explain a civilization that it does not understand? The two civilizations may complement each other. Yes, but when it comes to analysis... So, I don't really like to read novels that use low-level technology to explain the mysterious side or use low-level mysterious side to analyze the technological side. For example, I read a book before and traveled through time to become King Zhou of Shang Dynasty, and then used modern technology to beat the saint. Isn't this nonsense? Even if you have traveled from a high-tech civilization, some technologies cannot be played by one person, let alone a low-tech civilization.

Dear writer, your new book is very good. I have joined the new book investment group. Please update~

It's very toxic to involve the government and politics.

It can be brainless, it can be ignorant, it can be poisonous, it can be dark, but it must not be political. Once politics is involved, all of the above will be poisonous.

Very creative. However, I always feel that something is strange. The protagonist himself is a wizard, leading ordinary people to study things in the wizarding world. Is it really okay? 😰😰

Didn't the author delve into the ancient times of Harry Potter? If the author had read Dragons, he wouldn't have thought that house elves were pitiful. Humans are not the only race with magic. There are elves, Veela, dragons, centaurs, etc. What do you think will happen to humans if house elves dominate? In dragons, people themselves have no power and are worshiped. Women are sacrificed to give birth to hybrids with dragon blood, so they have the ability to resist. In Harry Potter, aliens are prohibited from owning wands. The magic of house elves is powerful in itself. Are you sure you will not become a rapist in the future? Human status is bought with the blood of ancestors. Now you have to hand it over. I wish the author will write better and better in the future. Farewell

Regarding the Horcrux, it is assumed that every intelligent thinking consciousness is together. If the distance between an intelligent thinking consciousness and the source consciousness is too far or transcends time, space, and latitude, it will be impossible to form a hive (hexagonal matrix) intelligent thinking system.

Hey, when science can explain magic, is magic still magic?

Why was the protagonist beaten when he was in the Pentagon? Don't talk about using the Disillusionment Curse to make yourself invisible to the side first. Apparition is instantaneous. Why not just go ahead? Or are you mistaken, author, thinking that Apparition requires chanting a spell first? The protagonist is a person who is familiar with both science and magic. Weapons should be completely useless to him. When someone points a pistol at him, he doesn't teleport away or protect himself with armor, but becomes invisible? He doesn't understand this idea at all, and it leads to one question after another.

How does the author write the plot? Really get everyone? Holding a wooden stick and chanting a curse stupidly?

If you want to mention non-wizard world technology, you can mention the Tunguska explosion and Tesla. This is why Grindelwald wants to unite the non-wizard world

All the recommendation votes are given to you, please update quickly

To be honest, those wizards have never looked down on ordinary people. Even ordinary people turned wizards have been brainwashed because they have been there since childhood. They believe that ordinary people are not as good as the wizard Balabala, and if ordinary people turn into wizards, the best they can do is become like Hermione, which means becoming an employee of the Ministry of Magic. To be honest, with Hermione's genius and Justin's family background, it is possible for them to enter Oxford. Even if they don't enter Oxford, will the income and life of a dentist be poor? These wizards look down on ordinary people because they are not enterprising, but in the end they still have to rely on these ordinary people. I think it's totally possible to make the mudbloods in these wizard mouths rebel. After all, where did the word mudblood come from? It's discrimination. Dumbledore's recruitment of students with magical qualifications among ordinary people is also sucking the blood of modern civilized society. I don't know if they caused the so-called magic rampage deliberately. And human civilization can't build a superpower academy on its own, so it has to go to you? His idea of ​​only accepting children is not just a convenient way of brainwashing, such as promoting magic. Children before middle school are too young and no parents would let their children run that far. Moreover, at that time, children in ordinary schools would not receive too many beliefs and ideas, and they would mainly focus on playing. So insidious

Harry Potter is a typical work of Western fantasy. Most of the people who watch it go there for the magic. After all, there are many more science fiction movies than fantasy movies.

I don't like Serena very much. She is just friends with the protagonist and has no other relationship. Why does she always care about where the protagonist goes? So what if she doesn't reply? Why does the protagonist keep licking her? On the contrary, snack food is better I don't know what it would be like for two people to meet.

I feel like there's something wrong with the way I write it, it's bland and there's no sense of immersion at all?

It feels like the protagonist is always giving without getting much in return? Depending on the protagonist's skills and abilities, you can develop a company and compete for status, power, wealth, and finally, you can even build a country.

Although the setting seems okay, it really doesn't make the book readable, and it is filled with long paragraphs of the author's own opinions. . . Many of the views seemed uncomfortable, so I gave them up.