Becoming King in Ancient Times

Long review: The plot has not yet been developed, but I have to say that the author found this entry point really well. I am an old reader of your last book, and it did seem quite young. I could read it simply because I really like the original subject matter, where the king came to the barbaric era and lit the torch of civilization in the eternal night. From then on, history was divided into two parts. I got this book from a recommendation. I say it's a good starting point because most of the original novels fall into a weird routine. At first glance, the routines of many original novels are almost the same. It's not because the authors have nothing to write, but because they have too much to write. , Just like the dinosaurs in your last book (it should be this one), it is either an alien invasion or an environmental crisis... There are so many things to write about, but everyone starts with the same thing. This is so strange, because there are so many things that can be written, and there are so many starting points that can be used. This is a good starting point. It replaces the main contradiction in the original novel: the contradiction between man and nature with a more complex and reasonable one: the struggle between the protagonist and other people, and against nature. This kind of development has a liberating meaning in it, rather than just because I want to live a better life and I want to promote technology, which is a big but empty argument. I think the author has obviously learned a lesson from the previous book and has a preliminary understanding of his own rhythm. To be honest, slow-paced books are not very popular in the market (this is one of the reasons why primitive genres are rare), and your current book has a relatively tight rhythm. I hope to keep this advantage in mind. It is best to have a refreshing point within every five chapters. In addition, let me talk about a few shortcomings: 1. The update speed is too slow (I just think it is slow, funny) 2. The writing power is not good. Thanks to this decent beginning, there are many details that have not been written out, such as the world view, the cultural economy at that time, etc. Either you have not made detailed settings and just started with this outline, or let's put it mildly and say that the writing power is not good. 3. Rhythm! Rhythm! Don't forget what happened in your last book. I won't say too much about the previous book so as not to mislead new readers. Anyway, you know it in your mind and it's over. Don't try to become Zentraedi Star Technology all of a sudden. In addition to water technology, you must have the concept of character creation in your eyes. Regarding the second question, it is in conflict with the first question. If you want to rely on this pen to make a living, your current writing power is definitely not good. Concentrate on writing a chapter with a longer word count. It depends on whether you can control it and write what should be written. Check for omissions and fill in the gaps. It is better than anything else. Don't lose your beginning.

Sitting there is a brain disorder, fighting from Europe to Asia, the logistics are dragging him to death, plus there are high mountains and deserts, if he wants to fight over, it is not in the steam era, so he can't even think about it. It is very troublesome to attack the entire Central Plains. From Europe to Asia, you will only do this unless you have a brain.

Brother, , it's hard for me to subscribe to all of your updates. Hurry up and cum, or you have to leave

It was impossible for Europe to reach the east. The Roman Empire was too far away from China. There were virgin forests halfway along the way. How could they march? I'm afraid that before reaching the protagonist's territory, all the enemies will die due to various diseases, hunger, and cold.

It turns out that the author of Wild Footprints has opened a new book. I can't tell whether it's good or bad in eight chapters. I'll give it a book and support it first.

The biggest poisonous point of this book is that artillery has been invented since primitive times.

It would be too crooked to write about Rome reaching China. In this era where virgin forests are everywhere, it is impossible to achieve. Even if they come to China, Roman travelers should know what period China is in. They can't eat Europe, Central Asia, Africa, and Russia, let alone China, so don't go too far. And instead of an expedition to China, it is better to expedition to Africa. There is no difference between Africa and China in this period. They are all virgin forests, and Africa is closer. It would be great for Roman travelers to develop Africa in their lifetime.

The protagonist is a typical double-standard dog. He is a slave and hates the slave master. This is true. Now that he has become the leader, it is also true to attack other tribes. What's unpleasant is that no matter what he does, the protagonist feels that he is righteous, which is disgusting.

For thousands of years, the idea that slaves are slaves can only be said by one person to move a group of people who have never read books?

Why does this book discriminate against women? Women should have the right to education. Even in feudal society, women should not be treated so differently. They are all carbon-based life forms with the same composition. Just because they have different physiological functions on the road of evolution, it is wrong to use a lot of feudal dross such as female virtues to cover up their gender discrimination. Of course, the protagonist of this book is just a mortal, and he has indeed asked for it, but he does not say it out, and he feels unhappy. The more he reads, the more he feels that it is full of discrimination against women. (I'm not a woman, maybe a little bit feminist)