The Solitary Lord of Guzhu in the Great Qin

How should I put it? I accidentally read it on a pirated version. I am too lazy to use my previous account. Come on, author. If I didn't recommend it, I will recommend it to you. ✊

I swear in the name of Qianshu Zhan, this book of immortal grass! Excellent textual research from the Qin and Han Dynasties, non-poisonous green food, please share it!

I hope the author will ignore some people who don't think logically and continue to write articles according to their own ideas. This is a good article and I am recommending it to my friends.

Did the Yin and Shang Dynasties really die because of Emperor Xin's cruelty? Why was Great Qin destroyed in two generations? A hundred schools of thought unite to hunt black birds? Are the Qiang and Hu the Huns? The answers are all in this book. The content is sufficient, full of practical information, easy to understand, neither bragging nor slanderous. Each stage has its own merits . Existence is reasonable, and reasonableness is existence. In this non-stop modern world, it is no longer possible to calm down and read history books. Life is really short, how long can knowledge last? Most of a person's knowledge comes from reading. Useful or not, isn't it also a kind of gain? The Yin and Shang dynasties cultivated solitary bamboo, which is immortal and is a black bird. The souls of the descendants of Yan and Huang will always exist in China.

Even the Silver Power didn't stop the author from entering the palace.

Could this be the legendary second entry into the palace?

This is a book with great potential. From the historical information in the text, we can see that the author spent a lot of effort on this book. He ordered it all and read it in one sitting. To raise some details, first of all, every word after subscribing is charged. Although it is not much, it has the most direct impact on the readers' senses. There are really too many typos, missing words, and wrong sentences. It is really harmless to say that it is a few mistakes, but too often is a problem of the author's attitude. Some readers don't care, and some readers care very much, hoping to save the manuscript and improve it. Secondly, the chapters are coherent, and the "protagonist is missing" issue seems a bit confusing. I think it should be miscellaneous. Based on the author's writing style, I think this should not be a problem at all. The pace can be slowed down and the plot, diction, emotional drama, and the connection between the previous chapters can be refined. After all, it can make people enter the drama but it can distract people from the drama in small ways. That would be a pity. The more I read about history, the more critical I become. It's rare to find a good article. I hope the author can add more polish to the details. This little bit of insight is just for reference. Come on~

Alas, when I looked through the catalog a year later, the reading record happened to be "No news is also news." I originally wanted to save a few more chapters, but I didn't expect that it would take a year. From April 2019 to April this year, the situation changed suddenly, and I no longer had the obsession to read this book at that time. When will the Great Emperor be able to rebuild his ideal Lone Bamboo Kingdom again...

At first, I read it as a primitive construction and business simulation book. However, the author's description of the golden finger props is vague, and the description of the tribal system construction is too brief. Later, he directly changes the perspective and goes to a few rangers to realize their ideals and ambitions. The psychological description of the ancients in the mode of modern people seems to be random, as if the author's likes and dislikes are all used to shape the character plot, commonly known as private goods. The author cleverly integrates some professional knowledge and allusions into the story, so the protagonist's plot in the front makes people feel very refreshing and novel, but the perspective of historical figures in the subsequent plot is difficult for people to substitute. I personally don't like to explore the inner depths of a certain character, especially virtual characters, because this requires high writing skills; as for the deduction of history, it is a bit boring after losing the protagonist.

It's terrifying to think about it carefully. All the characters described in the article have multiple identities, profound backgrounds, and have their own agendas. They may be selfish, or for the various schools of thought, or for the country. They frequently perform various infernal affairs, which is so terrifying 😓😓😓