Quick Transmigration: Luck Like a Koi

This book is excellent and worth reading for a long time. The author's writing style has matured after several books, and the author is very adept at grasping the main plot. Sometimes, the author may involuntarily write too much about other side plots, but this does not affect the development of the main plot.

The writing is really good. But it doesn't really relate to the title; it's clearly about self-improvement, yet it uses the image of a lucky koi fish… Where's the lucky koi fish?

This time travel is really fast... 😅 Aside from winning the lottery once, I haven't seen any other lucky winners... 😜 Making money relies on memory... In various senses... 😅

This is an old-fashioned, clichéd female rivalry story written in the style of an elementary school student. The villains are all stereotypical, and the female supporting characters have virtually no common sense. Run!

The writing is good, and it uses the "lucky koi" slogan. In reality, she only won a few hundred thousand. The rest of the time, she saved President Li using her memories, and bought stocks using her memories. It's one thing for a teenage girl to quietly make a fortune, but she has to tell a seasoned veteran of the underworld... Secondly, is this female supporting character really mentally deficient?

The story was well-told, but the female rivalry was unbearable to watch, and the fact that so many men were portrayed as positive figures made it even more unbearable.

This is an idiotic and unsatisfying read; it's too toxic to continue.

I'm so angry reading this. I'm speechless. Can't they just kill off characters in historical fiction all at once? Several of them are like that. It's infuriating! I'm so fed up. Why can't they just kill them off all at once? They have to cause trouble and then kill them off. I'm truly speechless. And the reputation of historical fiction is so important! I'm really speechless. The female lead has absolutely no common sense.

Why can't we invest?!

It came from a short video platform. The beginning was indeed very good, making people want to watch. I don't want to say anything malicious, but the more I watched, the less I could continue. Here are a few points I hope the creator can improve. Firstly, the author's grasp of the logic is insufficient.