Wizard Dawn

Are you taking a boat to the Wizarding Continent? Does the protagonist have a brain? Will he be assigned to the dark wizard organization? Is the selection of tutors divided into paid and random? Is the protagonist moderately qualified? Is the talent Shadow or Necromancer? Will you also study pharmacy? Will the academy be attacked? Will you go out on missions? Will he go to the white wizard's territory where his old friend once lived? Is there another central continent? Will he get the mysterious mark of the nightmare world? Let me answer the big question, I will add the bookshelf first.

I have read many wizard books of this kind, and they are all written in this way. In the early stage, when the protagonist was a knight, he would do anything to become stronger, eradicate the roots, and pursue eternity and truth at all costs. Later, the protagonist began to change when he entered the wizarding world. I also have friends, euphemistically called the scenery and Taoist companions on the way forward. There is also an academy. Be as loyal as you want. There is also a mentor, so respect him as much as possible. I never thought about betraying the academy and killing my mentor to obtain greater benefits. He will not resort to any means to obtain benefits. Don't you want to eliminate the roots? The ants will help if they can. What's even more disgusting is that some books even include women. The author has already set the character of the protagonist in the early stage, why did he become the Madonna in the later stage? In the early stage, it will definitely dissuade readers who like the Madonna, and in the later stage, it will disgust readers who like darkness. Can anyone help explain what the author thinks of this way of writing?

1. I don't understand how the protagonist survived the dark corner. 2. Sofa's decisive character is also described by the author, but it always feels a bit abrasive. 3. Play blindly when you are weak. 4. Making enemies. The plot arrangement of Death Tomb is too deliberate and forcibly makes enemies. The Tomb of Death is not as good as the previous ones, but more than the inferior ones. It has made enemies everywhere, but it still has the leisure to provoke. If this is the background of the protagonist, it is completely besieged on all sides. The elites in the sect have been killed and injured, and the death faction is on the verge of breaking out.

Very well written, hope to update more😁. . . . . . . . Please improve

The guide recommended this book, and I saw that it was a complete book. I read dozens of chapters and it was okay, so I ordered it all. . Read to the end. . . Is this also the end? Is this considered the finished book?

Don't be serious when reading novels, don't use your brain, otherwise you will be short of books...

I don't like this kind of unscrupulous, betrayal protagonist at heart. I won't offend others unless they offend me. It doesn't matter whether they are gangsters or fishing for law enforcement. However, if they kill many people and attack others for no reason, can this kind of scum stand on the top of the truth? Why can't you be a person like Wei Ya in the article? If you are starving to death, then it doesn't matter even if you eat people, but if you don't endanger yourself and you have enough resources, you think of robbing unrelated people. It's shameless.

I read this book very early. The first few chapters are eye-catching and feel very novel, but in the middle and late stages, it starts to become routine. After reading the beginning of the plot, you can guess the subsequent plot, which is a pity.

Why do I feel that wizarding literature is just learning literature? Kill people in order to learn, and continue learning after killing people. So what is the purpose of learning? To become strong. But everything described is incidental, and its purpose is to learn more about morality.

The plot is a mess and I don't know what to write.

I have read many wizard books of this kind, and they are all written in this way. In the early stage, when the protagonist was a knight, he would do anything to become stronger, eradicate the roots, and pursue eternity and truth at all costs. Later, the protagonist began to change when he entered the wizarding world. I also have friends, euphemistically called the scenery and Taoist companions on the way forward. There is also an academy. Be as loyal as you want. There is also a mentor, so respect him as much as possible. I never thought about betraying the academy and killing my mentor to obtain greater benefits. He will not resort to any means to obtain benefits. Don't you want to eliminate the roots? The ants will help if they can. What's even more disgusting is that some books even include women. The author has already set the character of the protagonist in the early stage, why did he become the Madonna in the later stage? In the early stage, it will definitely dissuade readers who like the Madonna, and in the later stage, it will disgust readers who like darkness. Can anyone help explain what the author thinks of this way of writing?

Can't the author come up with some new plots, even if they are a bit bland? From the moment I entered the wizarding world, it was all about routines, what about shadows, what about mentors, 9 out of 10 wizarding novels are like this

I feel that a wizard should be a rational and calm individual. Judging from your psychological description of the protagonist, it is too complicated and changeable! What anger! Anger! Anger! Anger! ! Roar! It gives me a headache just looking at it

After becoming a wizard, I'm afraid I really can't figure out who the protagonist is. The protagonist has become a supporting role, and the mentor has become the protagonist.

30 Photos, it was fine before. Chapter 30, from now on, just read it as a novice, don't use your brain.

The plot feels a bit like boiled water, and the essence of the wizard style has not been written. Spells only require mental outlines and spells, no prerequisite knowledge or anything else is needed. There is no learning in pharmacy, just knowing how to refine and formulate it. There is no understanding, no innovation, just like following the template. The plot is flat and there is no conflict, the protagonist has no sense of strength, and the map has no sense of distance... I can only say that it is like eating puffed food, which is still expired.

At first, I felt that the protagonist's departure from Noire as a leader was irresponsible to the people of Noire, so I stopped reading... But the protagonist is a wizard and not a knight. Do I still require him to have chivalry? I feel like my brain is broken, but I just don't want to watch it. I picked it up again during the book shortage today. Well, it's a really good book.

Vote 9 to support the author! ! ! ! !

Vote 9 to support the author! ! ! ! !

Nothing special! It's just a mage article! It doesn't feel like a wizard at all. . There is no such thing as a wizard without any creativity. . .

I'm really speechless. Did they just let them die on their way to the Wizarding Continent? 10 Does not save one. Aren't they tested to be gifted? You can become a wizard's apprentice, why not protect the past? Let them accept death directly on the road? They have wizard talents, so they have value. Should they just throw this value away on the roadside? Is it so luxurious?

Damn, give it a try! The first essence in life (╯3╰)

I came in when I saw the dawn, emmm, shouldn't it be the shooter's dawn? →_→

It's a good wizarding article in the early stage

The one-year hiatus is over, haihaihai(ಡωಡ)

It has been added to the collection. It has great ideas and the author's writing is very good. This book title makes people want to click on it. I visited with my work "The Witcher Begins in America". Thank you!