The Ultimate Championship Piece

I haven't read this book yet, I plan to keep it on hold. But I have a suggestion, or rather, it's more of an educational piece. Since the author titled it "Championship Puzzle," it means the protagonist isn't a typical superstar (theoretically, he shouldn't be a superstar), but rather a clutch player, a defensive stalwart, a top-tier 3-and-D player, a bench hog—the kind of character.

It really was a jigsaw puzzle. Goodbye!

The entire novel. The protagonist's name is mostly ruined.

I think this "King of the Fourth Quarter" skill is terrible. The description is incredibly vague. An 80% bonus to layups and mid-range shots plus a 25% increase makes it a 100-point rating, but the performance isn't great either. In overtime, it's even higher at 125, which is off the charts! 100 Is the maximum, yet it's still so bad? What is this description even about?

Am I not reading the book carefully enough, or did the author not even write these most basic things?

I abandoned the book; I couldn't find any passion in it.

The book was full of typos and grammatical errors that made me want to vomit. As someone with OCD, I had to figure it all out myself.

It's getting more and more like a rambling account; there's more nonsense from other teams than in the main text. It's ridiculous. The online commentary I've seen in the NBA comment section is far more exciting and stimulating than what you've selected.

Will the protagonist not become a superstar?

The plot was too bland, a complete chronological account, comparable to McGrady's 44-minute performance. I felt nothing after watching it. The description of the match lacks some setup; there's no background information before the match, and no off-field descriptions, such as a war of words, which makes it less anticipated. During the game, the lineups of both sides are not explained.