The Great Pirate: Ainz Ooal Gown

1. For the first 20 or so pictures, I didn't write any chapters at all. I just forgot about it. Then I started writing again. It was so obsessive-compulsive. 2. I only read the first picture for the time being, but I always felt something was wrong, but I couldn't tell. After reading it again carefully, I finally found the problem. To put it simply, it means that there is no description. Simply put, it means speaking as it speaks. It never describes the expression on the face when speaking. The psychological description is psychological description. It is absolutely unwilling to add half a sentence of side description. The action is just action. It is simple and crude, straightforward and does not want to add half a word of expression. Also, I almost didn't write about the supporting characters, because I remember that in the original work, Bellamy was always surrounded by a group of younger brothers, but in the first picture, Bellamy died simply and violently. I asked him from behind the corner. I didn't realize that this person existed at all, and his little brother holding a Nepali sword. I forgot his name. There are many scenes in the original work, but they are not in the author's book. I think this conflicts with the original work. Another thing, the origin of the protagonist is written without beginning or end. Is it a power system in a certain game or movie? However, I haven't seen it, so I'm confused. Another thing is that the protagonist speaks too palely, almost like a faceless man. Can you at least write some expressions? Also, as for the background around the protagonist and the scene where the story takes place, there is too little ink to form a three-dimensional scene, and it is difficult to imagine the specific appearance. Moreover, the description of the action and psychology is clear and distinct, and it does not want to be mixed together at all. Therefore, the whole scene feels like a paper man singing a big show against a pile of stone sculptures against a blank background. However, the author's writing style can accurately describe the cause, process, and result, which makes it even more weird. To be honest, my mind is a little confused, because I have never seen such a writing style, which is pale and weird. You may say that his writing is bad, but he can clearly explain the causes, processes and results. You may say that he is not bad, but he responds in a different way. I don't know. What analogy should I use? After reading this chapter, I felt as if I saw a dog standing up and walking, then asking me for directions, taking a sip of the poop ice cream cone in my hand, then snatching away my shirt, and throwing a Jacky Cheung at me.

In the morning, I revised the chapter names, deleted the leave request, and changed the introduction (I really didn't expect that a guy like me, with thick eyebrows and big eyes, would betray the revolution) and then the book was sealed. The editor-in-chief didn't pay attention to me, and the update will depend on when the blockade will be unblocked. (Be honest and lazy)

Why do we watch Bone King We just like to watch Bone King fighting wits and courage with the air We just want to watch Bone King go to the Novice Village at full level The world of Pirates is not as mysterious as Bone King World The three generals can actually fight so many back and forth with the guardians of the realm? Sorry, this is not the nunnery.

I gave up after seeing the few chapters where Blackbeard appeared. He was an enemy and wanted to insult the protagonist's power for a long time. He killed the unknown one and let the famous one go. It was really six.

When I saw that it was about Ainz, I wanted to report this book. When did villains become so popular?

It's chapter 30 and I'm going to talk about the author, you should kill Luffy just because everyone asks you to do it, because no one will read it. The people who ask you to kill Luffy are only 10% likely to read your book. After the disaster, Luffy, the most important person in the world of pirates, died, and this book will definitely drive away 1/2 of the readers. . . .

Before I even read it, I saw a lot of criticism in the book reviews. It seemed like it was about killing Luffy? Why kill him? Isn't it just to show off in front of the protagonist? If you kill the empress, will you all jump over the wall? And I saw someone saying that the author is doomed to the street? I have read a book where the empress is killed, Ace is dead, Garp is dead, the heroine is dead, the master's iron fist is dead, and a lot of his subordinates are dead. Is it better to rush to the street, but the people I read seem not to rush to the street. This book is not finished yet. If you are not convinced, you can look up the title of the book. I won't say it, so as not to say that I am advertising in a different way.

Just for the crime of killing Luffy, I'll let you rush to the street without any discussion.

It will collapse, how long will the author persist?

I feel uncomfortable reading the introduction. Do you really like dark novels that much?