Reborn in the Past: Becoming a Master Chef

Introduction to the TV series "Love in the Courtyard"

Yo ho, you even deleted my comment! Why don't you just say that you plagiarized "The Courtyard of Love"? Just copy it. Anyway, I've almost finished reading it. After reading it for so long, I pinned it to the top. Now that I think about it, I was drunk. The characters in it are exactly the same but their names have been changed. The editor of this book is also quite unlucky.

What I regret the most is that I booked everything without reading the reviews! Just throw it into the water. In addition to the messy arrangement of his love life, the theme of the book is completely inconsistent with the title of the book. It is not about going back in time to become a chef, but about going back in time to become a business tycoon first. Come on, I originally planned to read the author's other works, but this one defeated me, so I say goodbye!

Hey, can the author explain why he is kind to widows and why he wants to help others raise children? Can you explain it?

Copying love in the courtyard, there are too many poisonous points

It's all determined, the author will show his face. . .

I can't bear the poison It's a complete plagiarism of the TV series "Love in the Courtyard". You, a girl, come to the male channel and write according to the rhythm of the female channel. I held on until I reached Chapter 148 and couldn't bear it anymore. As far as the current situation is concerned, the male protagonist is reborn with a golden finger just to serve as a licker for the female protagonist. If he misses the first good one, he will not take it back. It's really a plagiarism from the TV series, but his brain is crazy.

I'm just wondering, does the author know what it was like in the 1960s? You are still a chef, did you have it at that time? Without seasoning, you'd be a shitty chef

The first chapter of the male protagonist talks about the Madonna's good intentions in that era, and then writes about the greed and ignorance of the two children. The second chapter also writes about the cowardice of the widow and the partiality of her mother-in-law. The male protagonist is a good person who does good deeds, the Madonna, and he is the only good person in the world 😅😅 Anyway, he is very 🤢🤮I sincerely advise everyone not to read it

The author really did not understand the social atmosphere of the 1960s, so he wrote about emotions in a large space and wrote nonsense. But readers born before the 1980s really can't appreciate it.