My Gilded Age

Seeing the pig's trotters, I still don't understand why Feng Ru suddenly turned cold towards the pig's trotters after the two broke through their relationship. I was convinced! Do you still need to think about such a simple question? I must think you are too young! Need to ask?

This book, everything else is good, especially the first two pages. The portrayal of the female top student makes people understand the definition of a scumbag. No matter how beautiful you are, have tattoos, or smoke, there are really many stories. However, the development is too fast and I can't keep up with the rhythm. I picked up this book for the third time and I tried to read it!

The art exam process is written like a fool, and everyone is smart; A teacher wants to steal the protagonist's work, and it can't be solved after dozens of chapters; It's hard to get 200 points in the college entrance examination. People with a little IQ can pass it with a little study. Is the protagonist mentally retarded? A newcomer who is not even an actor is so awesome with the assistant director. Directors in the entertainment industry may only care about art and don't know how to communicate, but how can the assistant director be such a novice? To put it bluntly, it is still a forced intelligence; A seventeen-year-old boy who is still very young, no matter who he meets, no matter how old the other person is, he has to call him Lao Bai. Is this a normal way of communication? An entertainment article is not about a bunch of stupid relatives and forcibly creating conflicts; When writing about Huayu, it's okay to just change the name of the person. The surname and first name are changed together. No matter how you look at it, it will look awkward. Is this the old author? If the Internet is cleared and pornographic articles are not allowed to be written, will they no longer be able to write? All kinds of clichés, all kinds of tricks, all kinds of pretentiousness, and that's all, it's just a fart.

The Hong Kong version of Jin Yong and the mainland version of Jin Yong, after watching "Film Teacher", I feel that what it says makes sense Chapter 672... European movies pursue a sense of documentary and emphasize objectivity and calmness, so that the audience looks at the matter calmly from a distance; while Hollywood movies emphasize that the lens is set on the scene, pursuing a sense of substitution, which is to prevent the audience from getting distracted and unable to enter other spaces. This is the result of the different purposes of both parties. What is the difference between them? In fact, these two differences in the use of lenses are an important reason why audiences don't like to watch domestic movies. Movies rarely have exactly the same story, so it is difficult to compare. Let me take the TV series as an example. The stories of Zhang Jizhong's version of "Dragon" and the Xiangjiang version of "Dragon" are the same. Zhang's version of "Dragon" is better in terms of production, special effects, and actors' performances. However, many viewers just think that the Xiangjiang version is better. Apart from preconceptions, the most critical thing is the use of the camera. The shots of the Zhang version of "Dragon Movie" are biased towards Europe, and the camera moves and pans a lot. This kind of shooting method is very good for historical dramas, and it gives the feeling of objectively examining history. But "Dragon" is a martial arts film, and what the audience wants is not calmness and objectivity, but refreshing. The reason why the Xiangjiang version gives people a refreshing feeling is that the camera has more push and pull, giving people a strong sense of presence. For example, in Shaolin Temple, Qiao Feng thought that You Tanzhi had blinded Ah Zi, so he asked You Tanzhi, was it you who blinded Ah Zi? In terms of performance, Hu Jun's handling is much better, and the character's action chain is very clear, but in terms of impact on the audience, it is not as good as Huang Rihua. The problem is that when Hu Jun was talking, the director gave a close-up shot, and the shot did not change; while when Huang Rihua was talking, the shot was quickly pushed from a close-up shot to a close-up. The image in the close-up shot showed a tendency to break through the frame and expand outward, giving people a strong visual tension, so the audience would feel the pressure and feel that Huang Rihua was righteous! Nowadays, many directors in China are learning from Hollywood and making commercial films, but the audio-visual language is often more European, giving the audience a poor sense of immersion. If our experts and professors could pay attention to this issue and put forward more suggestions, it would be of great help to the director, but our experts and professors are just talking about ideas and depth! "…

I've read dozens of chapters. I went to the drama and came to the drama. Can you change the direction? ? ?

In fact, the author, when writing about superstars, you should avoid literary traps. It is best not to touch any literary films. Commercial films are the first choice for superstars. Commercial films can reflect the box office and appeal of stars. In order to accept the approval of those so-called film critics and a small number of audiences, if you make literary films, you cannot be a superstar and can only be an actor. Moreover, no investor dares to spend tens of millions or hundreds of millions. If you bet on an actor who has no box office appeal, what will happen even if he wins the Oscar? Many Oscar winners make commercial films but still fail at the box office. For the sake of awards, you can make literary films, but the main body is commercial films. You can't have more literary films and you must not have less commercial films. Otherwise, you just change the name of the book to the actor instead of the superstar. Which superstar does not have strong box office appeal and popularity? As for attention, it's also best to distinguish between priorities, whether to focus on making movies or singing. This is very important. Also, Chinese people will not have many opportunities to develop in Hollywood. Hollywood is the most discriminatory towards foreigners. Finally, don't bring too many personal things, don't be too literary. The audience just watches movies for fun and relaxation. Those who think about human nature and various philosophies The problem is that most viewers can't understand it and won't watch it, especially those literary and artistic films written by some authors with high depth and various reflections on human nature. It's nonsense to have billions in box office and good reviews. Also, half of the success of a movie is promoted. The most famous one is the Harry Potter series, and Warner Bros. Spends astronomical amounts of money on promotion. I don't mean to scold the author, I just express my thoughts as a reader after reading so many books!

The original heroine of China Entertainment is really addictive to me. Who watches China Entertainment just to see the original heroine? Entertainment articles are really poisonous. It is better to read business articles than to read this.

How embarrassing! There are too many poisonous points. I am also a book junkie. A few years ago, I read a few chapters and gave up. Now I picked it up and read it again, but I still can't resist it! If you continue to watch it, you will go crazy! The poisonous spots are one next to another! I don't know how the author can be so talented and write such rubbish works! I'm really convinced!

I picked up this book several times. Every time I saw an advertisement for Motorola, I couldn't stand it for a long time. Motorola's executives wrote like a retard. You sell a Motorola cell phone ringtone, and you look like a shopkeeper, and people still have to beg you. . .

I keep saying that I'm embarrassed if I copy other people's stuff, but I don't want to plagiarize other people's stuff. But in the end, it's interesting that I copied it anyway. Besides, what else can you do if you don't copy? It's so pretentious to know that you don't know anything