Cultural Frontline

The last novel is still on the bookshelf, but after reading this one, I feel that the level has dropped a bit compared to the previous two books. However, the movie I adapted is still good-looking and gives people a sense of picture. The description of life is a bit too much, but I still support it, come on 💪!

Let's make the most of our strengths and avoid our weaknesses. Let's put the emotional drama aside for now. Although the author's own thoughts and wishes are definitely involved in writing this book, the main part still relies on the hard material of the movie, and the readers' opinions can still be properly listened to for those scraps. I followed it all the way from the film teacher (although the film teacher watched the pirated version 🙂). But I sincerely support the author, and I have supported the original version since the last book. I really don't want the author to lose a lot of readers because of some side details! Happy New Year to everyone!

What kind of system, apocalypse, and lizard people are involved, it's so fucked up. Just write entertainment articles properly. How can you save the world if you don't have enough? ! Let's keep it first, it's really poisonous at first.

An incomparable second-level aura came over him.

I really need to complain. The author, you, the author, criticized those directors in your novel very clearly, saying that they were not good at making commercial movies. The reason you said is very reasonable is that you are just enjoying yourself while filming. How come you are so happy with writing, can't you write your movie well? If you insist on criticizing until you are banned, those directors can't afford the audience who bought the tickets. I want to ask you, are you worthy of the readers who watch the original version? I want to watch key politics. Where can I not watch it? Just write your movie well. If you feel uncomfortable about something, you can create a public account or a group. But if you have to write it in a novel, no one will be able to find it after you block it. It really doesn't respect us readers.

The first feeling I had when watching "Film Teacher" was that it opened the door to a new world and allowed me to understand a lot about the entertainment industry and the teaching models of the three major universities. At that time, I felt that the author was at least a student from the three major universities (the author said in the novel that he was a theater student, but I don't know if it is true or not), so he had such an understanding of film teaching. Unlike other authors who copy the content of the film during filming, the author very professionally introduces screenwriting, photography, art, lighting, special effects, editing, filming process and many other contents, and the film he writes about is quite excellent. It looks no worse than A Mou's. Ning Hao's "The Heartbreaker" moved me so much. Not only the movie, but also the business war was very exciting and amazing. It taught me a lot about the Internet and entrepreneurship. Golden Retriever's book is simply incomparable, and only Lao Bai's book can compete. However, the movies written by Lao Bai in "Literary Times" have all been made by other people. Lao Bai is just pulling out the movies to analyze them, and at most refining them. Personally, I feel that they are far inferior to Qingcheng's self-directed and self-acted movies. Of course, Lao Bai is also a person who cares about face. Later, he secretly competed with Qingcheng in his new book "From 1983". You wrote business war dramas and I also wrote them. You wrote about the Olympic Games and I wrote about the Asian Games. You wrote "The Biography of Zhang Chunru" I saved a "Hutong Family" by myself (I personally feel that Hutong Family, written by Lao Bai, is quite wonderful). The early stage of "From 1983" is no less than that of "Film Teacher", but in the later stage, it cannot avoid turning into a running story. It stands to reason that Qingcheng's writing skills are not inferior to Lao Bai's. If he can persevere, it should not be difficult to become a god. However, it seems that in reality, Qingcheng's family conditions are good, and he does not need to write books to support his family like Golden Retriever and Lao Bai. He often writes in and out, maybe writing in his spare time. If there are any flaws, Qingcheng's flaw is that the characters he creates are too crazy, too arrogant, and have a sense of being aloof, floating in the sky, and divorced from reality, which makes it difficult for people to have a sense of empathy. (For example, the fairy sister didn't even want to pursue her, which made many readers feel aggrieved.) There is a certain urge to be the enemy of the whole world. Pretending to be a slap in the face, of course it's okay to write a cultivation novel like this, but it's very problematic to write a realistic novel like this. After all, this is a realistic novel, not a parallel world. The protagonist overthrows Huayi, blocks the Beijing circle, reveals officialdom affairs (he is still alive now), and scolds Hong Kong Island and Wanwan. Wan Fu, I wish you looked down on us before, we are the masters of human beings, you stay in hotels and we stay in guest houses, you get big money and we get small changes, you play the leading role and we play the supporting role, you eat the good stuff and we eat the bad stuff, Qingcheng can't wait to turn it upside down (we have the final say now that we have money). In fact, this is wrong. The current directive spirit of the central government is that the three places and two sides of the Taiwan Strait should try their best to pursue harmonious coexistence. If you always use that bit of black history to say something is bad (whether it is an individual, a company or the government), isn't this promoting hatred? Whether the east wind prevails over the west wind, or the west wind overpowers the east wind, aren't the Chinese people fighting within themselves? I think Qingcheng should write something about the great national harmony. I think part of the reason why I couldn't finish the last book was because of this. Even if we can't unite them all, we should unite the majority to attack a small group, instead of cutting one line at a time. I have seen too many geniuses wither, (such as Yun Tianming whose writing style is comparable to Chen Dong). If Qingcheng can persevere and make changes, he will definitely become a god. Of course, Qingcheng is not short of money. If it is just a personal hobby, then you can write whatever you want without thinking too much. In addition, let me talk about my personal appeal. I am a big fan of Qingcheng. I need your guidance and help. Can you help me? Your fans ~ Disciple Chendong

Nowadays, entertainment novels tend to be literary and artistic. It's really disgusting. In reality, there are some celebrities who don't do it for money. The so-called veteran drama stars are just not popular and have no news value. Black materials are not exposed. Children under the age of six are overturned as soon as they become famous. They are all real people. What are they doing? Art and literary youth have a realm, and they have the ability to take pictures of Jiangxi's 1999 uprising for public grains, and the Boston tunnels abroad. Wenqingwen is just for the sake of being independent. This disease was called Shamat in the 2000s, and the next stage is called washing, cutting, and blowing. In rural areas, it is generally called sand sculpture.

Did the author sell his account? Or did he hire a gunman to write this book? It is completely different from the author's previous books, Film Teacher, Filmmaker Legend, how well written, but now this book is really bad 😅

I think the biggest problem at the moment is opening a company here. If a film and television company is engaged in film production and social networking sites, can't they register two companies? There is also a female friend who was my childhood sweetheart who promised to give me 10% and be the coo when she was still interning at Dalian Morgan, which directly poisoned me to death. The film team also took options on social networking sites. Your own company has just started with 65% left. You will still need to raise funds later. What are you doing! The above personal opinions

Brother, I beg you, open a public account and finish writing the legend of the filmmaker, and then continue writing this. Hey, I have already watched the movie Teacher again.

This book is written on a completely different level than the previous two. I endured reading a hundred chapters, but I couldn't stand it anymore.

If you don't like seeing it, just don't drive it, and don't spray nonsense here! ! ! It is already so difficult to write Chinese entertainment articles, with mythical beasts watching eagerly from the sidelines. I think we should encourage authors like Qingcheng and Jinmao more, instead of being tyrannical! If you don't like it, please go out and turn right, we won't send you away! ! !

The author is so pitiful, every book has been blocked, it reminds me of Lao Wang, Wang Zijun

Alas, I'll go. It's too difficult for this author. If you write something about Hong Kong, people will say that Hong Kong is a bad area. I wrote something to steal the box office, but I was said to have no bottom line. If you write some daily prose, you are said to be worse than a big water hair. I sat on my thighs while writing, but all the chapters flew by 😅😅😅

🤭🤭Wuji is very stubborn! The more I seal it, the more I write...

The last stubbornness😆😆😆

People in the film and television industry read two books. Tell me your thoughts. The first one is that I feel that the author may have been with the team, but maybe he is older, or he observes from a relatively peripheral position, or he analyzes the shooting process after watching a lot of behind-the-scenes footage of unpopular movies. I am relatively confident in this judgment (actually, for entertainment works, I will jump to the shooting chapter first to see if it is a realistic or fantasy work... Then look back at the preparation stage, and I can basically judge whether the author is in the industry or whether there are in-depth interviews) Having been in the industry, there is basically no need to watch post-production) The second is that the author's research ability is too strong. Many film history, especially things within the system, can be confirmed by my understanding and hearing in the industry, but our understanding is definitely not as systematic as the author's. (Actually, I am already quite an industrialist and can sort out some historical technologies myself) Third, in the last book, the content of the film studio is actually a bit lacking. I think the focus may be on the historical side, and I haven't had much discussion with the seniors who have worked in the factory. To be honest, the author has more Spring and Autumn style of writing, which I think is a helpless move. For example, film shooting is basically taken for granted (book fans, please understand that this is a fact, but this is not a criticism, because most people can only write based on their imagination, and the author has tried his best to be as sophisticated as possible. I thought it was very interesting when I read it) Fourthly, I was shocked when I read this book about rescuing cats, because this thing is rarely touched by non-professionals, but after reading it, I found that the author listed several professional books and content. This is actually a bit strange, because whether it is a novel or a script, this kind of enumeration method will make people uncomfortable. Especially those who are familiar with these professional books will know the principles of the story, how to explain it in simple terms, and how to build the story step by step instead of "setting up" the story. For example, the similarities and differences between these professional books can lead to many interesting stories from the perspective of screenwriters (there have been private quarrels about these books in the screenwriter community) rather than the kind of discussion introduction. In short, it is a bit academic. To sum up, I personally think that the author should be an avid film "academic" enthusiast. He may have chatted with some insiders in the industry, but he does not mainly go into gossip. I am especially familiar with the changes in the national system and the anecdotes of industry leaders, which may be the result of research or communication with the older generation of teachers. I haven't seen the first movie Teacher, so I can't tell whether the author is from the education system. But it is indeed possible that the author is a film major, and is very likely to be engaged in teaching. On the contrary, it is unlikely to become a professional screenwriter. Having said so much, I actually want to ask if there is a qq group and how to contact the author. I want to have a chat 😏

Please author, please don't save Chinese movies. Don't you have a good idea of ​​your level? Embarrassing as hell

Looking at it now, I am not disappointed, but regrets are indeed there. By the time more than 120 chapters into "Legend of Filmmakers", the skeleton has been established, and the works that appeared exuded a strong energy. But in this book now, I only see a pile of limp fat. There is a saying that I deeply believe in , Any film and television work cannot be done only with ideology, it will be too rigid and rigid, It is even worse without ideology, as it will slip into the entertainment-to-death, colorful backwaters. It is the skeleton of a work. Without it, there is no possibility of standing up.

Trample capital under your feet and let them call them daddy. This introduction is full of secondary errors. If capital is trampled, can it still be called capital? In the great world, only our party can trample capital. When you go abroad, capital is a powerful existence.

Boss, what's going on? Why didn't I write the last book? Is this book stable?😰

Write to Poison! It's obvious that we don't want to see you here anymore. .

Are the pigs about to be slaughtered from Qingcheng? The story I am currently writing is Transformed by an Immortal, and the storyline is mostly similar to the movie Teacher

I still remember the movie Birds of a Feather. After watching it, I said this movie was a bad movie. It was the director's self-pity that moved me. I was scolded so badly that more than 300 people scolded me in one post. From then on, I will never watch a movie under the banner of domestically produced artistic films.

I want to review the movie Teacher, but why is it missing?

It's a pity that such a good author doesn't publish photos. I just finished watching Legend of the Filmmaker, and the melancholy that arose spontaneously when it came to an abrupt end has not been there for years. The scripts written by the author should be very good in film and television. There is a reason why China's cultural industry cannot take off.