The Empire That Never Was

Because of the time difference, the answer is a little late. The author forgives me. First of all, I want to praise Xiao Tang. Xiao Tang finally touched the threshold of class struggle. The handling method this time is very appropriate. We must stabilize the old aristocracy, especially the loyal aristocracy, because the Middle Ages is after all an era where birth and blood are judged, and the military power of the old aristocracy is what Xiao Tang must rely on. The second is for some book friends who don't understand. First of all, some book friends say that it is impossible to vigorously support the emerging class. Xiao Tang's military power relied largely on the old aristocrats. In the Middle Ages, ruling ties were established by blood and status. The loyal old aristocratic class was the precious wealth of the feudal lords. Secondly, Xiao Tang only had a few people and a few guns? Even the king is far behind and still wants to engage in class struggle at this time. Do you think he will die soon enough? It is stupidest to look at the problems of the Middle Ages from a modern perspective. In the Middle Ages, the people were the people, and the ruling class was the aristocracy. If the aristocrats could not bully the people at will, it would be a kingdom on earth. Do you want to launch a people's revolution? Haha, the old noble will kill you first! Naive!

Regarding the title issue, it is similar to YE**YLOAED. You can find it through movie search. I personally think it is not good to use Chinese ministers. The relationship between nobles and nobles is not a vassal relationship but a contractual relationship. When Madame is used as an honorific title without a name, it usually refers specifically to the prince's wife. The honorific title Monseigneur is applied to high-status religious and secular nobles, such as archbishops, princes and cabinet ministers. The abbreviation is Mgr.