July 15, Sunny

The author is a good person, and the if line gives a little comfort. When I read this book, I always take Wang Jinping's perspective, maybe because I have the same label as him, doting on controlling parents and an obedient and obedient girl. The behavior style is exactly the same, because the interpersonal relationships around me have been simple since I was a child, and I have inexplicable trust in the friends around me. I listen to whatever is said and have no objection to left or right. You will also meet acquaintances with malicious intentions, and you will be tricked and led around. Wang Jinping did not let the atmosphere get colder and did not let his words fall to the ground. Wang Jinping was too stupid to recognize Du Mingjun's warning. In the end, Wang Jinping buried his bones in the desert with hatred. The if-line was reborn, and it was Wang Jinping's bones that were replaced, and it was also the bones of readers with characters like ours. I am very happy to see such a high-quality article in Jinjiang, with good intentions, good writing style, and good narrative rhythm. The simple story is so thrilling and fascinating, and the skill is really impressive. Looking forward to another great work.

I have a question, how did Liu Hu and Chen Duo prove their alibi? Du Mingjun was called away by his secretary and had tickets and certificates to prove it. Liu and Chen directly told the old couple how long it would take for their son to come back? This is not logical. After the old couple called the police, the police didn't question Liu and Chen? The more times you ask, the more loopholes will appear. I really can't figure out how Liu Hu and Chen Duo got rid of suspicion here.

The frame is straight, the narrative is traditional, and it is so satisfactory that it can be included in a suspense short story in "Today's Statement". In fact, there are not many suspense elements. It is a pretense in the early stage, and the real murderer and accomplices can be guessed in the middle stage. The plot line adopts a two-line parallel narrative. The 15th line is too painful and heavy, and the 12th line is dark and cloudy. The only adjustment is the description of the food, because the rhythm of this part is too slow, and after reading it, you will even wonder if you are watching a suspense novel. Finally, there is the HE version of the if line, which can be regarded as a comfort candy for readers. This article is more realistic, so almost every character has flaws and "makes mistakes." Because there are too many negative descriptions of human nature, I even feel that I can hallucinate the chaotic and evil perspective of beasts from the characters. When discussing the crotch, it is like a beast that has lost its mind and only has primitive desires. It is very uncomfortable to watch. This book brings together flawed characters, and I see something of an anti-Greek tragedy in it. Ancient Greek tragedies often describe tragedies in which no one is at fault but everyone's actions push events to an irreversible end. This book emphasizes that everyone is at fault, but those who are kind and toothless will eventually swallow the bitter pill. Although the subject matter is traditional, the characters are vividly depicted by the author's conscious action descriptions, which makes people sympathize with the characters in the book and often feel sad. In addition, the writing style of the whole book is natural and smooth, and it has a movie atmosphere, so you can read it even if it feels heavy. But speaking of the adaptation, I think the film adaptation may lack some sense of suspense and "explosiveness". The audience's psychological threshold for murder cases has been raised. It seems that the psychological needs of the audience can be satisfied only by focusing the camera on some quite curious criminals and crime methods. It is rare to shift the camera to murder cases that are as "ordinary", "uninteresting" and "expected" as in this book. This is also what I think this book deserves to be praised for: Only by removing those spices can we determine whose chassis is more solid. Of course, writing is not good without adding a little seasoning, and the excellence of the article cannot be compared horizontally (the shortcomings are very suitable for comparison). Then it becomes clear that the more suitable way to adapt this book is "Today's Statement" or even "French Popularization Column Drama". In contrast, the murderer did not harbor much "malice", and the victim did not suffer long-term "torture" (rather, this is the most ironic part of the book). The spectators seemed neutral but actually fired at both ends. The victim's family and even the murderer's family suffered a lot but also had some negligence. These settings are not "novel", but are too "today's statement". Compared with the more eye-catching bizarre cases, the cases in this novel seem to happen more frequently in reality and are more worthy of vigilance. At the same time, this book also tells us something deeply: A gentleman does not stand under a dangerous wall. He will run away immediately if he senses something is wrong. He must not take chances and let his own stupid kindness ruin his life. The frame is straight, the narrative is traditional, and it is so satisfactory that it can be included in a suspense short story in "Today's Statement". In fact, there are not many suspense elements. It is a pretense in the early stage, and the real murderer and accomplices can be guessed in the middle stage. The plot line adopts a two-line parallel narrative. The 15th line is too painful and heavy, and the 12th line is dark and cloudy. The only adjustment is the description of the food, because the rhythm of this part is too slow, and after reading it, you will even wonder if you are watching a suspense novel. Finally, there is the HE version of the if line, which can be regarded as a comfort candy for readers. This article is more realistic, so almost every character has flaws and "makes mistakes." Because there are too many negative descriptions of human nature, I even feel that I can hallucinate the chaotic and evil perspective of beasts from the characters. When discussing the crotch, it is like a beast that has lost its mind and only has primitive desires. It is very uncomfortable to watch. This book brings together flawed characters, and I see something of an anti-Greek tragedy in it. Ancient Greek tragedies often describe tragedies in which no one is at fault but everyone's actions push events to an irreversible end. This book emphasizes that everyone is at fault, but those who are kind and toothless will eventually swallow the bitter pill. Although the subject matter is traditional, the characters are vividly depicted by the author's conscious action descriptions, which makes people sympathize with the characters in the book and often feel sad. In addition, the writing style of the whole book is natural and smooth, and it has a movie atmosphere, so you can read it even if it feels heavy. But speaking of the adaptation, I think the film adaptation may lack some sense of suspense and "explosiveness". The audience's psychological threshold for murder cases has been raised. It seems that the psychological needs of the audience can be satisfied only by focusing the camera on some quite curious criminals and crime methods. It is rare to shift the camera to murder cases that are as "ordinary", "uninteresting" and "expected" as in this book. This is also what I think this book deserves to be praised for: Only by removing those spices can we determine whose chassis is more solid. Of course, writing is not good without adding a little seasoning, and the excellence of the article cannot be compared horizontally (the shortcomings are very suitable for comparison). Then it becomes clear that the more suitable way to adapt this book is "Today's Statement" or even "French Popularization Column Drama". In contrast, the murderer did not harbor much "malice", and the victim did not suffer long-term "torture" (rather, this is the most ironic part of the book). The spectators seemed neutral but actually fired at both ends. The victim's family and even the murderer's family suffered a lot but also had some negligence. These settings are not "novel", but are too "today's statement". Compared with the more eye-catching bizarre cases, the cases in this novel seem to happen more frequently in reality and are more worthy of vigilance. At the same time, this book also tells us something deeply: A gentleman does not stand under a dangerous wall. He will run away immediately if he senses something is wrong. He must not take chances and let his own stupid kindness ruin his life.

No, there are really people who are so naive that they want to buy an expensive car and go to an uninhabited desert [question mark] with a thug friend. Seriously, with this kind of education, this child will be tricked to death even if he is not killed. Doting, incompetent, cowardly

The stereotype has deepened again. It's better not to contact anyone who works in shady places.

It must be that he has always felt guilty. He had suspicions, but there was no evidence. He obviously tried to save him, but failed to persist.

Hey, luckily there is an if line, otherwise it would be too sad

I find it very interesting!! It's a very special title, I clicked on it just because of the title. The titles of each chapter look neat and the timeline is clearly written.

Fortunately, there are extras to make up for some shortcomings. But when I think about the painful real life, I feel that the beauty of the extra is also a kind of cruelty.

The author's writing style is super smooth and sophisticated. It's like watching a wonderful movie and you can even imagine the storyboards in your mind. Thank you to the author for creating such an excellent work.