Climbing High

The full text of "Deng Gao" has 36,000 words, and only 30,000 words can be posted here. There are a total of 16 extra chapters, and only 9 can be posted here. You can find the other parts by yourself, or help each other in the comment area. If you like it, please come back and give me some good reviews. Thank you everyone for liking it~

It's so good that I hope it can be put on WeChat for reading, and I even want to list it as a feminist book. Many times I have been amazed by the author's writing style and shocked by the settings and views of Master Xiaofang and Master Gao! On the long road to equal rights, when you lose your fighting spirit, just watch "Ascend" [crying]

I was in junior high school when I first studied on PO, and now I'm in college [crying] [crying] The teacher's writing is very good [kiss] [kiss]!

The rule of law relies on systems, while the rule of power relies on people. If Shuo Shu becomes a powerful minister, it will be easy for the people to live in dire straits. It depends on whether there is a wise king or a wise minister to punish him. But if there is a perfect system, these rats can be restrained, and the king will not be so blatantly partial to rats. These two are both wonderful people, reaching the same goal by different paths and complementing each other. In the process of continuous improvement of the system, it is necessary to play some tricks and create some pressure from public opinion. It reminds me that in real life, many backward systems have not changed, and the system stipulates the scale of punishment. Some individual incidents can only be punished within the prescribed legal provisions due to pressure from public opinion. Some of them do not need to be punished so severely (such as the Haitang ocean fishing incident), and even those that should be severely punished are very light (domestic violence leading to death, wall frying, etc.), Which simply encourages crime. The overwhelming public opinion has failed to push forward the revision of the system, which is disappointing.

One advocates governing the country according to law, and the other advocates putting the people first.

The writing is superb! ! ! I've seen the po version! ! ! 55555 Please be sure to update it carefully (?ω?)

I think I'm very good at writing. I wrote about women's progress and their current predicament. The author has a good grasp of the situation. I agree with the author's views in the postscript. I won't say too much. It's an honor to read such an author. [A dog's head holds a rose][A dog's head holds a rose]

Who is restricting what women can do? Do whatever you love!

Venting his own pain on other innocent people is inherently bad. The pressure he endured and his suffering were not worth mentioning in front of his sisters who were suppressed even though they were excellent, and in front of the maid he killed. He is a vested interest, and his pity is only pitiful when compared to other vested interests. The women who were killed by him with bones at his feet are the ones who really have no choice and nowhere to escape.

My wife's literary skills are very good. I read them as feminist works. Those readers should really thank my wife for her teaching support [laughing and crying]