A story behind a piece of history, the clash of two great empires, and the tangled passions and grudges of several heroes and heroines... The story begins with the Tang dynasty's defeat at Lianyun Fortress against Tibet. It follows four military campaigns against Tibet and the Battle of Talas against the Arabs, and ends with the Battle of Tong Pass in the early days of the An Lushan Rebellion.
Yang Luofu is a beautiful but worldly woman, married to the son of the calligrapher Yan Zhenqing. Then disaster strikes without warning. Emperor Li Longji orders the extermination of the entire Yang clan, and Luofu disguises herself as a man to escape the calamity, taking a minor post in the Ministry of Revenue. There, she meets Gao Xianzhi, a famed general from the Western Regions, and gets caught up in a bizarre murder case in the capital. Before long, she is bound for the Western Regions...
A loyal and righteous young general, an ambitious Arab prince, and a wandering poet who watches over her in silence: faced with the relentless fate history has in store for her, what will she choose?
I have always liked Yi Ran's writing. After reading it again, I still feel that Yi Ran is indeed a suitable person to write articles. Dad, waiting for you to come back...
What a woman with personality Was there really such a woman in that era?
I'm so happy to see the lock unlocked Check it out even if there are no updates
I also read the so-called plagiarized article. They are two completely different articles. I don't understand why someone insists on plagiarism.
Is it plagiarism to use the same dynasty as the protagonist's name? This article is not very popular. Why did I think of copying it into "Shuo Feng Fei Yang"... Besides, if the author is not here now, how can he ask people to appeal within two weeks!!!
I watched "Shuo Feng Fei Yang" and I didn't see any plagiarism? You are mistaken.
Shuo Feng Feiyang was written in May 2004 At least the time of the first chapter above is 2004-5-11
You can tell whether it was copied just by looking at the writing date. This article was written in 2005, Shuo Feng Feiyang has not read this article and does not know when it was written. If Shuo Feng Feiyang wrote it first, then there is something wrong with this article and it may involve plagiarism.
Downstairs, you are wrong. As long as Ms. Lei Mu doesn't copy other people's works, her own writing is also full of Lei.
Some people say that this article is not only unremarkable, but also has a great change in writing style. The author's writing style has been sublimated to an extraordinary level, and is even worse than "Becoming a Buddha on the Ground". It's just a copy of Shuo Fengfeiyang, is it true?