The Master of Metaphysics Just Wants to Leave the Spotlight

Let me explain, the plot of the article is actually pretty good, and I personally like metaphysics themes, so I insisted on reading it. It's not just that I don't like it and I feel guilty. Why was it given a low score? First of all, the main character's behavior is unlikable. To massacre a city in order to resurrect the senior brother, it is indeed indifferent that the people did not speak out for the person who saved them, but this is not a reason to spare the well-being of others. The justification after the attack also makes people feel that the three views are too crooked. You will die in the first place, so killing you is not a sin. Who is not born to die? Doesn't drawing out someone else's soul mean killing someone? This concept is so speechless. Although I won't judge people based on things, I still hope the author can think more about it. Secondly, this is the real reason for the low score. It is understandable that the plot is abrupt. After all, the author also said that there is no outline and the writing is hasty, but it is too hasty. I am playing the voice playback, and the flaws will be particularly obvious. There are too many typos, missing words, semantic repetitions (wrong sentences), and idioms used indiscriminately throughout the article, which greatly affects the reading experience. Is it a rush or a lack of solid foundation? Or is the attitude not correct enough? I probably won't look for abuse in the same author's articles in the future, so I won't make more comments. I wish my wife the more she writes, the better.

I originally read the one from Maomao Next Door. That one was so awesome that I read another one. At that time, I was still thinking about how to write such a good wife and no one read it. As a result, the quality difference was a bit big qwq, and the rhythm immediately collapsed in the later period. In fact, it was too rushed to write. I could have taken a leave of absence or changed it to another one the next day. This way the impression is really not very good... The relationship between the two protagonists and the three perspectives of the protagonist. , The character shown in the protagonist's memory recovery period is a bit broken, and then there are bad sentences everywhere. It feels like I was written in a hurry and didn't even read what it was typed out. We bought it with money, and we can't accept it just because of your haste. I am a self-media owner and I know very well that it is a matter of gaining fans and wanting to be popular. On the marketing side, quality determines reputation and long-term success.

After reading it in one sitting, the author also said that the text was written in a hurry, without an outline, and made no logical sense. It's just that the three views are incompetent, and they are still the ancient three views that can destroy the world for the sake of one's lover. I am not a Holy Mother, asking the protagonist to sacrifice himself to achieve success for others, but the injustice has its owner, the debt has its owner, and the people of the whole city are so innocent!

I was caught off guard. I felt like I wasn't writing in a hurry, but I was writing badly.

It's so rotten that it's stuck in the mud.

The story is good, but it's a pity that when it comes to Gong Shou's explanation of the massacre, it's quite uncomfortable to read. I don't know if it's because of the hasty writing. From reading the Maomao copy, I believe the author's writing will get better and better.

It was pretty good before Gong regained his memory... But it got a little baffling later on. I might as well have died. After all, I killed so many innocent people. It's quite speechless to think that someone killed me just to resurrect my lover.

So who was the person behind the scenes that made all these things appear in front of Xiao Chu? Did I look too quickly and didn't notice it?

The ending is spreading flowers. I really didn't expect it to be a short article at first.

|????)っ? Like you?