The Two Faces of the Villainous Big Shot [Crossover]

Finished spreading flowers! This is one of the best British and American fanfictions I have ever seen. Thank you, madam. It's a pity that because it's the main line of the movie version, there are no mutants + timeline issues, so I can't see the three bald bosses ( Saitama Furuichi Charles) who fell in love with each other at first sight (bushi)

After reading it, I felt moved and a little empty.

I can't stand it. It's really well written. Is it possible to add a few more extras, madam [poor]

So, so, it's really great to have Saitama-sensei here. No matter what, everyone's ending in this world is so tender and touching.

I have subscribed to the full book, and I will briefly share my personal subjective opinion. I don't mean to say that the author is not good, nor Saitama is bad. This book is very well written, the plot closely follows the foreshadowing, and the writing is very good. Most of the characters are he, and the sub-CP is also very good. However, there is one thing, which may be regarded as one of the selling points of the article, which makes me a little uncomfortable personally. The following is a subjective point of view. The comment is because it is not enjoyable to write. I do not mean to give any opinions on writing. It is just a personal feeling. I have completed the entire book in the past two days, but I still have Ferrero's extras that I have not read. All aspects of it are very attractive to me, but there is one thing that makes me feel more and more uncomfortable the more I watch it. I will just talk about it casually without giving too much spoilers. It should not be particularly spoilers. I will try not to mention the specific plot and just give it a rough outline. Let me make it clear first that I have never watched One Punch Man, but I don't mean that I feel bad about Saitama. On the contrary, he looks too good in the article. To be honest, I feel a bit deified. Let me also explain that I haven't read Japanese comics for a long time. It may be due to my ability to accept it, so I feel uncomfortable. I don't think the author's setting is bad. It's just that I can't accept it for personal reasons. The thing that makes me more uncomfortable is the cult of personality. The first half of the article is actually okay, the trend is not particularly obvious, but in the later period with the growth of the Justice Society, it becomes more and more obvious. Although this should be regarded as a selling point and a normal trend, after all, it is dressed as the Red Skull, but, how should I put it, maybe I have read too much in DC, not Saitama. It's not good, and it's not that I don't trust him. It's just that this kind of society led by one person and completely advocating one person's point of view (it feels like it will become a society in the later period. The Justice Society started as a community organization, coupled with the Hydra tentacles all over the world, and a certain event in the later period affected the national level) makes me a little creepy. If it is just complete worship within Hydra, I can accept it. Villains have no human rights. But if it develops into a global positive activity, and this kind of brainwashing and fanaticism will become the world, I feel a bit scary. I don't mean to say anything bad about Saitama, and I don't think he will use this to do bad things. It's just that the fanaticism and adoration of so many people, especially within the association, makes me feel a bit scary. My personal thought is that when a person's reputation reaches its peak, everything he says is right and everything he does is right. This is something that makes me personally feel terrible. In fact, I have recently read similar novels where everything is correct, but that is a workplace novel. The protagonist and others are subordinates of the company, and there is only a relationship of interest. The advice others want is limited to business, and it can only be business. But this article is not a workplace novel. The relationship between the protagonist and other people is not just a relationship of interest. The meaning behind this makes me a little uncomfortable, because it feels like he is creating a god, but this may be one of the selling points. There are also passages in the article where he shapes justice and evil and so on. Some of the plots that revolve around this point make me a little uncomfortable, but speaking out one by one would be a spoiler. I feel that I may not have made it too clear, but the general meaning should be clear. I think the author did not have any appreciation for personality worship when writing the article. It is just my personal idea about the world in the article. This kind of influence has a wide range and the degree of worship is very deep. Shaping? It made me a little uncomfortable, but other than that it was a good article. I don't know if it's because I personally can't accept the stall being too big. I personally feel that in the world of the article, there is a bit of complete worship of Saitama. I think Saitama is pretty good, but what I can't accept is the complete adoration of a person. Let me emphasize it to show that I don't think he is bad. Personally, I feel that complete trust and complete worship is a very scary thing. It involves too many people and a wide range of people. In the later stage, I simply saved a country and then allowed a new country to be established under this influence. I don't mean that belief is bad, but I don't think it can make living people become the belief of many people. Moreover, people all over the country may eventually become the mainstream of the world, which makes me feel a bit scary. Although the author has explained that Saitama himself is the villain leader, and he himself is also a good person. But I just feel terrible, just a personal problem. There are also some words that roughly mean that Saitama's organization is free from government interference and can act entirely on its own righteousness. However, the original Avengers is based on SHIELD and is fundamentally related to the government (?) If this is not the meaning, it is my fault for misunderstanding. I am not supporting Chaoying to be controlled by the government. The organization in the article is not completely free. It usually cooperates with the police station, helps evacuate and resist in big crises, etc. However, a powerful organization cannot be completely based on the worship of a certain person. It may be a bit heavy association, but it is also an inappropriate analogy. I somewhat associate it with the complete worship of Wenge. I am young and have not much experience, so I only know this. This metaphor may be a bit heavy, but it gives me a similar feeling. Maybe it's a personal problem for me. To have unconditional faith and respect for someone is a loss of self-awareness for me. How should I put it? I think the most important thing for a person is not the ability to think for oneself. Although the choice to join is made by oneself, how can one see clearly in the game after joining? Another point is that I think it is not impossible to believe in someone, but the scope cannot be too large and the impact cannot be too great. Even though I know he won't do bad things, I still feel terrible. It's just terrible because the impact is too great and affects too many people. Even from a God's perspective, I feel horrible. This has nothing to do with whether Saitama is right or not. It's just that too many people's excessive enthusiasm for a certain person makes me feel horrible, as if I have lost the ability to think independently. Finally, I would like to say that the article itself is good, and the style is light-hearted. Everyone has been influenced by it, but descriptions like this make me uncomfortable. It is not directed at the author or the character. I will also feel uncomfortable when I see similar descriptions in other infrastructure articles. If you can accept this, this article is really well written and I recommend reading it.

I really like the article, looking forward to new articles!

I like it so much, so warm?

Ahhhhhhhh! I read it again, it's a treasure trove of articles. It's a pity that I missed the physical book and read it four times!

Author, I like you so much! How to say it? Just, I have been following your article many times. Before, because I didn't have my own mobile phone number or money, I kept reading pirated articles. Recently, I read it immediately after I was able to read the main text because of some things. After reading it, I was a little touched. I was really impressed.

N I have watched it many times and I still like it very much. I never get tired of it (๓´˘`๓)