A quick plug for my new novel, a historical BG romance, After Sending the Emperor to the Cold Palace. Click into my author page to find it.
Reporter: Your Majesty the Empress, what is your dream?
Empress: Kill the emperor.
Help my son ascend the throne.
Rule from behind the curtain as the Empress Dowager.
Reach the pinnacle of life.
Then stir up trouble, stir up trouble, and stir up lots and lots of trouble.
Reporter: Your Majesty the Emperor, what is your dream?
Emperor: Kill the empress.
Avenge Jian Bi.
Suppress the maternal relatives and monopolize the government,
reach the pinnacle of life.
Then stir up trouble, stir up trouble, and stir up lots and lots of trouble.
Reporter: So what does marriage mean to the two of you?
Emperor and Empress, in unison: Kill! Kill! Kill!
The two great delusions of the imperial couple's lives:
This time, I'll definitely kill him (her).
This time, I'll definitely turn the tables.
This novel is also known as The Domineering Empress Falls for Me and My Emperor Can't Possibly Be This Cute.
A friendly reminder:
This is a lighthearted comedy set in a completely fictional world, not a serious historical romance. Many of the settings reflect the author's peculiar sense of humor, so readers who care about historical accuracy should enter with caution.
One-on-one romance, happy ending, and the male lead has never touched any of the women in his harem.
Updates are guaranteed, so feel free to bookmark it, dear readers. Sending love!
The novel uses anti-piracy protection, with a 30% threshold. Readers who have subscribed to less than 30% of the novel will have to wait a day to unlock new chapters. I hope you'll support the official release QAQ.
I'd also like to recommend my old novel, The Emperor's Husband's Daily Life. If you're interested, feel free to check it out.
Theme:
I would like to know why the author gave the heroine the character of a smart and cold goddess who is high above the clouds from the very beginning. Why is the heroine not actually smart once? It feels like the heroine's life is one of being plotted once, twice, and three times by her father (it seems that she is euphemistically called the heroine, but I'm not sure about this), and then she is plotted once or twice by her husband, the male protagonist... When I see it, I feel that every time the heroine appears, it is because she is being plotted... This is seriously inconsistent with her character. The author describes how good the heroine is, how powerful she will be as a man, and how pleased her father will be, but the whole text does not show how powerful the heroine is! I have always been crushed by my IQ! So I don't understand it. If the heroine is Ji Xiaomeng's silly, sweet and silly persona, I would completely understand, but isn't the heroine a persona that says "if she were a boy, nothing would happen to her"? After reading the penultimate chapter of the book, I don't see anything powerful about the heroine's abilities and ambitions. This is seriously inconsistent with the character of the heroine in the whole novel.
I thought that untying the knot in my heart would give the male protagonist a sense of security, but I didn't expect that the solution would be for the male protagonist to trick the female protagonist into realizing that she loves him so much that she can let go of the so-called knot in her heart. Does this count as love that throws away dignity, arrogance, and the original personality? So in the end, it's still It was the heroine who gave in, just like the last chapter of their separation. She was restrained and cautious, and she could not hide her love and wrote words of infatuation. The hero's arrogance was a real one, but it was not a reason. In the end, he was still making jokes and "pretending" to give in. Perhaps this kind of surrender is also a way for the two of them to get along, but in the past, the male protagonist occasionally proudly exposed his thoughts and expressed his hope that the female protagonist would be gentle, that she would not do whatever he wanted with his favor, and that he could have the majesty of a monarch. Although these words It was all leaked out in a joke, but if I didn't sincerely complain about my partner and what an ideal partner should be like, I wouldn't show it in my words again and again, so I'm afraid that the toad has eaten the swan's flesh and the goddess has fallen into the mortal world.
It's really frustrating to see this, and the author's handling of the heroine's heart is disappointing.
The author's previous concerns about the heroine hit the point: this is a systemic issue. Under an absolute monarchy, the emperor has absolute power over everyone. The life and death of others, even friends, wives, and children, are all decided by the monarch. Only in this way can the monarch think he is safe. However, under such absolute power, no self-respecting and rational person among his subjects will have any sense of security: Who wants to live under the control of others? If that person wants you to die, you can't live? Yes, he may be a just, kind and sensitive person now, and he may even love you very much, but wise men will also be deceived, virtue will be corrupted, and friendship will be worn away; the self-supervision of the monarch is not enough to eliminate any rational person's fear of the monarch abusing his power and depriving him of his freedom and even his life with unjust force. The fact is that under an absolute monarchy, or by extension, under any absolute power without supervision and checks and balances, no matter how smart, wealthy or noble a person is, the monarch or the person in power can kill him with just one thought. When the monarch's iron fist hits him, no law or system can provide him with protection. Anyone who is unwilling to be someone else's dog will not be satisfied with such an existence where life and death depend on others.
Therefore, the heroine's heart knot is the reaction of any self-respecting rational person to absolute power, and it is the inevitable result of absolute monarchy. In the final analysis, the marriage issue between the male protagonist and the female protagonist is a social system issue. The absolute monarchy system does not allow the monarch to get along with anyone like a free person: the monarch's security comes from his absolute power over others, and anyone who is subject to absolute power cannot be free from fear. Therefore, those beautiful things that can only be produced by the union of free people - equal love, trust and security - are naturally not available to the male and female protagonists.
In the end, the heroine's so-called relief from the knot is nothing more than believing that she loves the hero more than anything else, accepting her status as a servant, and accepting the risk of her own life and death. But this is not a real solution at all. It is nothing more than a temporary passion when the lover's life is in danger. Once the crisis is over and once you return to a peaceful daily life, the original problem will come back. The question is basically, "Are you willing to be someone's slave?" Even if that person is a loving and tolerant master, even if you seem to be equals when getting along with each other? Answering "yes" is the most tragic kind of moral failure and disrespect for oneself; answering "no" means injustice and entanglement: distrust of the partner, resistance to the partnership, and dissatisfaction with this system that allows people who love each other to form an equal relationship. Institutional problems can only be solved by institutions: promoting the rule of law, limiting the power of the monarch, and forming checks and balances so that the freedom and lives of citizens can be protected when the monarch abuses his power. It's a pity that the author originally had a fairly thorough understanding of the relationship between the male and female protagonists, but in the end he gave a solution that uses love to generate electricity.
Wow, Wow, Wow, I still can't get enough of it
Love this story. This author changes the person's pronoun to describe the story in a relaxed and humorous style. The author is really amazing.
Steel needle, at first I thought the male master and the female master were having an affair. It's so exciting to think about it.
If the character of a girl's father doesn't have a concubine or a concubine, he's still a male god if he's not infatuated.
Oh, has it been updated? ? ? ? ?
When will the new article be released?
Damn it, Damn it, Damn it, you actually started another romance
I originally wanted to pursue Danmei, but, it turned out to be my favorite fantasy romance! !
If I don't chase you, I'm not a human being! !
I would like to know why the author gave the heroine the character of a smart and cold goddess who is high above the clouds from the very beginning. Why is the heroine not actually smart once? It feels like the heroine's life is one of being plotted once, twice, and three times by her father (it seems that she is euphemistically called the heroine, but I'm not sure about this), and then she is plotted once or twice by her husband, the male protagonist... When I see it, I feel that every time the heroine appears, it is because she is being plotted... This is seriously inconsistent with her character. The author describes how good the heroine is, how powerful she will be as a man, and how pleased her father will be, but the whole text does not show how powerful the heroine is! I have always been crushed by my IQ! So I don't understand it. If the heroine is Ji Xiaomeng's silly, sweet and silly persona, I would completely understand, but isn't the heroine a persona that says "if she were a boy, nothing would happen to her"? After reading the penultimate chapter of the book, I don't see anything powerful about the heroine's abilities and ambitions. This is seriously inconsistent with the character of the heroine in the whole novel.
I thought that untying the knot in my heart would give the male protagonist a sense of security, but I didn't expect that the solution would be for the male protagonist to trick the female protagonist into realizing that she loves him so much that she can let go of the so-called knot in her heart. Does this count as love that throws away dignity, arrogance, and the original personality? So in the end, it's still It was the heroine who gave in, just like the last chapter of their separation. She was restrained and cautious, and she could not hide her love and wrote words of infatuation. The hero's arrogance was a real one, but it was not a reason. In the end, he was still making jokes and "pretending" to give in. Perhaps this kind of surrender is also a way for the two of them to get along, but in the past, the male protagonist occasionally proudly exposed his thoughts and expressed his hope that the female protagonist would be gentle, that she would not do whatever he wanted with his favor, and that he could have the majesty of a monarch. Although these words It was all leaked out in a joke, but if I didn't sincerely complain about my partner and what an ideal partner should be like, I wouldn't show it in my words again and again, so I'm afraid that the toad has eaten the swan's flesh and the goddess has fallen into the mortal world.
It's really frustrating to see this, and the author's handling of the heroine's heart is disappointing. The author's previous concerns about the heroine hit the point: this is a systemic issue. Under an absolute monarchy, the emperor has absolute power over everyone. The life and death of others, even friends, wives, and children, are all decided by the monarch. Only in this way can the monarch think he is safe. However, under such absolute power, no self-respecting and rational person among his subjects will have any sense of security: Who wants to live under the control of others? If that person wants you to die, you can't live? Yes, he may be a just, kind and sensitive person now, and he may even love you very much, but wise men will also be deceived, virtue will be corrupted, and friendship will be worn away; the self-supervision of the monarch is not enough to eliminate any rational person's fear of the monarch abusing his power and depriving him of his freedom and even his life with unjust force. The fact is that under an absolute monarchy, or by extension, under any absolute power without supervision and checks and balances, no matter how smart, wealthy or noble a person is, the monarch or the person in power can kill him with just one thought. When the monarch's iron fist hits him, no law or system can provide him with protection. Anyone who is unwilling to be someone else's dog will not be satisfied with such an existence where life and death depend on others. Therefore, the heroine's heart knot is the reaction of any self-respecting rational person to absolute power, and it is the inevitable result of absolute monarchy. In the final analysis, the marriage issue between the male protagonist and the female protagonist is a social system issue. The absolute monarchy system does not allow the monarch to get along with anyone like a free person: the monarch's security comes from his absolute power over others, and anyone who is subject to absolute power cannot be free from fear. Therefore, those beautiful things that can only be produced by the union of free people - equal love, trust and security - are naturally not available to the male and female protagonists. In the end, the heroine's so-called relief from the knot is nothing more than believing that she loves the hero more than anything else, accepting her status as a servant, and accepting the risk of her own life and death. But this is not a real solution at all. It is nothing more than a temporary passion when the lover's life is in danger. Once the crisis is over and once you return to a peaceful daily life, the original problem will come back. The question is basically, "Are you willing to be someone's slave?" Even if that person is a loving and tolerant master, even if you seem to be equals when getting along with each other? Answering "yes" is the most tragic kind of moral failure and disrespect for oneself; answering "no" means injustice and entanglement: distrust of the partner, resistance to the partnership, and dissatisfaction with this system that allows people who love each other to form an equal relationship. Institutional problems can only be solved by institutions: promoting the rule of law, limiting the power of the monarch, and forming checks and balances so that the freedom and lives of citizens can be protected when the monarch abuses his power. It's a pity that the author originally had a fairly thorough understanding of the relationship between the male and female protagonists, but in the end he gave a solution that uses love to generate electricity.
Wow, Wow, Wow, I still can't get enough of it
Love this story. This author changes the person's pronoun to describe the story in a relaxed and humorous style. The author is really amazing.
Steel needle, at first I thought the male master and the female master were having an affair. It's so exciting to think about it.
If the character of a girl's father doesn't have a concubine or a concubine, he's still a male god if he's not infatuated.
Oh, has it been updated? ? ? ? ?
When will the new article be released?
Damn it, Damn it, Damn it, you actually started another romance I originally wanted to pursue Danmei, but, it turned out to be my favorite fantasy romance! ! If I don't chase you, I'm not a human being! !