Coaching in the NBA, Starting with the Bobcats

To be fair, the book is pretty good, at least the basics are very good. The author's understanding of basketball tactics and background research are all worthy of praise. And it's not too mindless and obscene, and the writing still has a certain degree of reality. But why are there so many different voices in the comments section? I think the author did not grasp the priorities well and knew what the readers would like to read. The details were not appropriate and the pace was too slow. The preseason is long and boring, and every game is long and boring, lacking any excitement. What do readers want to read about such a business development article? Team transactions, lineup changes, and training of rookie players to grow and change step by step. The changes in voices caused by the changes in the team's record and the reaction from the outside world. This is actually the same as the traditional Shuangwen, but the author puts more emphasis on each game. Doesn't this seem a bit indifferent? In fact, I really like the starting point of the article. The new team, the Bobcats, has nothing to lose and is building a team from scratch. I think the lineup construction is better and in line with reality. But, it is true that it is the same as the view of many book friends. No matter what, Iguodala should not be selected as the second pick. At least there must be a downward trading process. No matter how conflicted the management is, they will not make such a big loss-making transaction. They will still consider public opinion and the team's interests. This seems like the protagonist is being taken advantage of. A good hand is played badly. If it were me, I wouldn't want to write a novel that is so brainless, and it would be difficult to write about a new person and a new team. I will write about the difficulties in brokering the deal. The front office of other teams is making things difficult, and they want to trade for the second pick, only to get a high pick + a second round pick, or a fringe player. Is it possible to write at this time? It seems like a disadvantage, but in fact it is a mistake, showing the foresight of the time traveler. As a time traveler, there are too few operations at the beginning. And assistant coaches, I think many of those coaches are not willing to come based on their qualifications. Wouldn't it be better to create more setbacks to show the difficulty of team building and the perseverance of the protagonist's character? Isn't it more interesting to hit the wall after hitting the wall, and finally work together to form a coaching staff? There are various stories about thorny players, small frictions between players, starting from doubts about the team and the head coach, and then slowly getting better and better in the end. Will the content of the novel be richer? I think the author has great potential, but this book still shows relatively little. The characterization is too thin. As a coaching article, this book is basically endowed with the characteristics of a group portrait, but neither the coach nor the players have distinctive personalities. The plot is also relatively ordinary, but I still think this is an ideal basketball article, and I give it four points of encouragement.

You can write less about favors and accidents and more about basketball. We are here to watch basketball, not the favors. But let me tell you, your writing is good. I hope you can write more about basketball.

This is a pretty good book

This book is well written. It doesn't have any other messy things. It just specializes in basketball. Isn't it good?

The book is very tactical, but difficult to read

The description is quite detailed, not silly writing.

Think clearly. The writing is also good. I don't know why the score is so low?

Not too brainless, the writing is delicate, the logic is tight, a good book

Very good novel

It's too detailed. Some descriptions don't need to be written. Try to be as detailed as possible.