I Asked You to Simulate a Crime, Not Commit the Perfect Crime!

There are very obvious loopholes in the Liu Jun case. First of all, there is a homeless man living in Liu Jun's house. Is there no surveillance in the victim's community? Now that the identity of the victim has been determined, we will first investigate the surveillance in the deceased's community to see if there is any conflict with the time of death. Second, where the protagonist was dismembered and what tools were used. If the body was dismembered at home, why did Lumilo detect only a small amount of blood in the living room. Under normal circumstances, if you dismember a body at home, the first choice is the bathroom for easy washing. As a professional detective, I have already done the luminol test, so I will definitely not miss every location. So, this is a big loophole. But there are two ways to fill it, The first is to set the protagonist to be dismembered in the wild. Second, the luminol reaction is not completely ineliminable and can be eliminated through a chemical method. As for what it is, the author can check it himself. In the end, the author wrote well and wonderfully, keep up the good work. ——From a grassroots policeman who loves to read novels.

Shouldn't it be said that there is only one truth first, and then the murderer is identified, and then the murderer quibbles, and then the protagonist reveals the murderer's murder method bit by bit, and then the murderer frantically asks the protagonist for evidence, and the protagonist then takes out the evidence and gives the murderer a final blow, and finally the murderer kneels down, then the BGM sounds, and then the murderer is crying and saying the last few words U??`U

Is this the beginning of a harem? Catherine, Zhao Zimai, and Lin Shuyue, the three women are closely involved with the protagonist. The author also deliberately wrote, is this a harem? Of course I'm not against it, but if you don't plan to open it, don't make it ambiguous. It's annoying to watch.

My fucking name is Liu Jun. It's so embarrassing to see this.

I finally figured out the correct way to read novels in Feilu. First, click on the book because the title is attractive, take a quick look at the introduction, and then scroll down directly to the comment area to read the first page. If more than 60% of the readers are scolding, then there is no need to go back to read the table of contents and just switch to the next book. If more than 70% says it's pretty good and the writing is OK, then it's just average and maybe worth reading to pass the time.

I thought the heroine would be Zhao Zimai, but Catherine turned up instead

1. Selecting amateurs to participate in simulated crimes really makes me want to complain every time I see it. First of all, who would be willing to expose their privacy to the whole world? Secondly, do amateurs have such acting skills? Shouldn't it be set up like this from the beginning? Shouldn't it be okay to just ask the program team to find drama actors? The protagonist just needs to provide the script for the actors to rehearse. 2. Time is really tight, three in a day. Do you have the time to arrange the crime scene? One a week? If you only want to write about the case and not about daily life, then you can just write about daily life in one stroke and just write about setting up the scene the rest of the time, right? To be honest, I can accept the timing. After all, I can pretend I didn't see it, but every time I see the solved cases and think that the people involved in these cases are all amateurs, I can't accept this setting.

In Chapter 53, the two members of the crime-solving team questioned the auxiliary rope and the autopsy report. It was like a joke. If there was no auxiliary rope or no report, then wouldn't it just tell them that it was a fake death? What kind of simulation would it be? So the situation with both of these is in line with the real reaction of people seeing hanging in real situations.

TM's novel "Hypnosis" makes me fall asleep better when I read it at night. It was so creepy that I was scared to death by the third case before I finished reading it for free. It scared me all night long. I was convinced by this old 6-year-old author.

If not, can you tell me who it is?