What Do You Mean, You Have a Playlist of Replacements?

Dude, even a bullet to the eye doesn't kill you? Is that pistol the Yellow River? Or is this some kind of monster? #(Sweat) If it were any other body part, you could argue about fat layers, bone plates, a junk pistol, and other factors combined. Is this what you call a monster fanboy?

In stand-in fanfiction, there are stand-ins with self-awareness, but they wouldn't betray the protagonist. If the author doesn't write about it, the readers won't think about it. But you've truly gone before, directly detonating this potential pitfall, leaving readers who have read your book utterly shocked and causing a major shift in stand-in fanfiction. 💩 In my long review, I've pointed out most of the potential pitfalls you might have made. Your immediate priority is to distinguish between a "stand-in" and a "clone" before writing. Stands should provide readers with a sense of "security," not the "autonomy" that might betray the protagonist for survival. Can you imagine fighting while constantly worrying that your stand-in might secretly sign a contract with the enemy to harm you? What does that even mean? #(Question mark)

Can you hear me? Can you hear me? That in the distance roar In the darkness Soul-stirring The beginning of awakening That broke through the earth A steadfast posture Is it proof of justice? The power of the legendary giant Tear the Milky Way apart His battle roar Summoning lightning and sparks A blow Don't tremble! Keep a close eye on it! That moment of resurrection People and all living beings... Looking at the starting point of all this Eden, the escapee from the universe Eden Eden, the escapee from the universe Eden.

I don't have many virtues when it comes to reading books, except that I enjoy reading comments and taking advice. If the comments section is full of people criticizing the author for being pretentious and pretentious, then I won't read the book.

I just have one question: You know gamblers and drug addicts are rotten people, and you also know how good and kind he used to be, with a heart of gold. Would you give him a chance? He said: "This is the last time, trust me one more time. If I win this time, I will quit gambling/I will quit using drugs this time." Would you give him another chance? The same applies to "intellectualism." He pleaded: "Give me another chance, I won't have this problem next time." Then for the next time: Hey 🤓, I have a little trick up my sleeve, this time I'm sure I can write something that will surprise everyone. Then it was a repetitive cycle of "Give me another chance," "Give me another chance," "I won't have another relapse," and "Please, everyone, give me a chance."

Those writers often get caught up in their pretentious, artsy-nosy tendencies. They'll suddenly have a brilliant idea while writing, then scribble something haphazardly and their subscriptions drop. Afterwards, they'll complain that today's readers are no good, that they can't even understand this little bit of stuff. How do you cure them? There's a common saying in the novel writing world: "A drop in subscriptions means they'll behave." Once the numbers drop, their over-the-top writing instantly sobers them up, and the flaws in their work immediately become apparent. #(Angry)

You've completely removed all the tags? Do you really think you can lure readers in and kill them by deleting the tags? Without any tags indicating that you used a black flash, not many people would read the rest of the content given this initial level of skill. If you can't handle pressure, don't expect to make money writing online novels, and don't just publish them for your own amusement. If you post something online and want to gain recognition from others, you have to be prepared to accept their criticism and harsh criticism. The same principle applies even to free fan fiction. If you can't even accept this most basic objective reality, then you shouldn't be writing books at all.

Is this all that's on the monthly chart? What does this mean? Have the readers' tastes changed so much in just a few weeks since I last used Hedgehog Cat? The tags and review sections are full of people saying "shit," but why am I being pushed to the top? Is it that you not only eat shit yourself, but also disgust the readers? #(Question mark) So high and mighty, huh? #(Seal)

When a substitute can betray the protagonist, it's no different from a clone poison. A substitute should be someone you can unconditionally trust, not a potential adversary. Why do these pretentious authors love creating clones? Is it just to make it easier for them to steal the female lead from the protagonist? The author better not include any nonsensical plot points in volume three where a character likes the substitute instead of the protagonist! #(Vomit) Are they planning to have the protagonist's cheat abilities sealed, the female lead run off with the substitute, and the protagonist become powerless? The pretentious, pretentious tone just kicks in. If these authors aren't put under pressure, they might actually come up with something like this. "Helpless," "powerless," and "no way out" are the words these pretentious authors love to use. The most ridiculous thing is that they can't do anything when they're weak, and they can't do anything when they're strong either. Why are you always so powerless? #(You know what I mean)

The author is unbelievable; three volumes, three bouts of madness—his thought process is truly extraordinary. This book does have its bright spots; the battle scenes are quite good. However, its flaws are even more glaring: the author seems determined to feed readers garbage. It's as if the author is a workaholic who can't live without creating terrible content. He could easily rake in readers' money by simply writing satisfying battle scenes, but instead, he pushes the limits of readers' tolerance, making his own life more difficult. He deserves all the criticism.