Xielu Lang of Tang Dynasty

If you accept money from others at the beginning but don't do anything for them, you can see that there is something wrong with the protagonist's low character. If you don't want to make progress but follow sideways, what people value is Zhang Shuo's reputation, not your literary talent. Even if your literary talent is higher than Zhang Shuo, so what? Self-righteous and lackluster.

How about novels? But I hate this kind of author and like to delete bad reviews. I deleted only five out of 15 reviews. It's obvious whether the book is good or not.

Author, let me calculate for you that you can code 3,600 words per second per hour. 24 Hours a day gives you 6 hours to sleep, and an hour to eat and wash gives you an hour longer. The idea is to give you an hour, and there are still 15 hours to code 54,000 words. Two chapters are updated in a day. These few words are enough for anyone to look like code words.

The main thing is whether I can stop writing cool articles. . You can just study like your son-in-law. In the early stage, it will be dull and warm, in the middle stage, it will be more passionate and passionate, with some goals and tasks, and in the later stage, you will learn some principles. Isn't there a very cool article? Do you have to be like this ten years ago to bully young people into poverty? How popular are the settings in the first three chapters? I think you have to be of a certain age to read most history books. If you are just doing it for grades and making more money, don't write exciting articles. It's really a headache to read a novel where the main character is obviously a young boy, but he still pretends to be a scheming one. There are novels written in a literary and artistic style, and these young people's novels are also pretty good written by this young boy. At least it's not hard-core, and it grows along with it. Do you know how to write "Growing Up"?

The plot at the beginning is a bit toxic. In terms of governance, Zhou Liang did nothing wrong. The key is that he didn't do much good. The problem was not solved. The dike breach caused a greater negative impact, and it was a sudden impact. Farms were destroyed and people died. He should have been held accountable. He directly wrote a report saying "Inability to solve the problem of water resources caused public conflicts and led to the breach." No matter how he was judged, it was because of his poor work ability that exacerbated the problem. If you want to express something, just write it as being framed and tricked to death. Otherwise, is there any difference between the way you write it and the logic of "the starting point is good" and "I am doing it for your own good" that only focuses on attitude and does not care about specific things? Since when has grassroots officials been judged based on their attitude rather than their ability? What kind of white lotus are you putting here? It fully embodies the protagonist's two ends, pretending to be a moral saint. At the beginning, I wanted to run away, and the money I saved was not divided, and it was all released to Zhou Liang's family. I knew that this guy was going to cause trouble, and I didn't want to get involved. It was reasonable. If something happened, don't be angry like a fool. And you were also angry at Henan Yin for taking the blame. It's wrong to take the blame, but you can't ask your colleagues in the officialdom to be saints, right? It's Zhou Liang who wants to be a right-wing man, but he doesn't act in unison and then blame others. I don't understand why he blames others from a high point. How can there be corruption if they are all role models of integrity? In reality, you wouldn't even dare to say anything if you were asked to do so. You didn't stand up to plead for the people in the first place. There is also the idea of ​​giving up half of your money to protect Zhou Liang's wife, which is fine emotionally, but as a time-traveling protagonist, it's like playing a game. It's not fun in the early stage and you only think about playing in a group when your teammates die. What did you do earlier?

I have incorrect outlook on life. I feel like a primary school student who has traveled through time. He does things without thinking.

Nine years old, nine years old, this book is really written blindly. Shen Zhezi was a young hero in the first book, but now the protagonist is getting more and more oily. Xiang Zong still feels a bit like Wei Xiaobao. There was only a small staff in the first book. This book can already be described as wretched. Don't write about the Tang Dynasty anymore. There is one book about Wuzhou Futang, one book about the former Tang Dynasty, and this one is about the prosperous Tang Dynasty. My brothers are tired of aesthetics. Isn't it good to write about Liu Song, Nan Qi, and Nan Liang before Xiao Bodhisattva's death? Who hasn't been scolded in recent years for writing about people before the An-Shi Rebellion?

There are really very few authors who can write well about the historical area. The author is very strong if he can stick to the ancient texts and the historical events of the time (the writing also puts a lot of effort into it). I hope the author can break through in the historical area! But after reading the first one, I didn't read it again. It's true that the author's several books are too similar. I've read all the previous ones except for the high-sounding ones. I feel that the female protagonist (should not only be the female protagonist, but the ones who have emotional scenes with the male protagonist are just tools) are dispensable and are just props to promote the plot, and the emotional scenes are half-written and have no characteristics ( It feels like a role based on a template), which makes me feel awkward when reading emotional scenes and daily life (and this is unavoidable in a novel, either the female characters are extremely compressed and ignored, or the female characters are shaped better). And this book has a historical background, which means that it has no political achievements and can only write about daily life (just It's farming quietly) I think if the protagonist is a time traveler, if he travels to the prosperous age and has such a life experience, he can combine his own knowledge to promote it (after all, people in the prosperous age who can leave their names in the history books always have some filters), and then during this, Li Longji was quickly corrupted because of the arrival of the prosperous age, and the protagonist also saw in the prosperous age that there is no cruelty in the history books. And Li Longji's failure to behave and resist (it's not that he didn't prepare in the early stage, he just rushed to rebel as soon as he came). In the end, the biggest joy of the prosperous Tang Dynasty was to write about Li Longji's panic after conquering Chang'an without the people having to suffer too much.

He is obviously a bastard who has been suppressed by his mistress since he was a child. He has no guidance from famous teachers. I wonder where Pig's Foot's literary talent comes from? Is it really a modern society to go out and make money on your own? Big families have big family rules, and even the pig's feet themselves are family property. Why does the author think he can keep the money he earns from the pig's feet? He also said that the family property would rather be passed on to a nephew than to a concubine. I really don't understand where the author got these messy information from.

I read nearly a hundred chapters, all of which are filled with grievances between wealthy families, family calculations, and petty petty arrogance.