Jinting Han People

The protagonist is resourceful but indecisive, a woman's benevolence, caring for small profits but pity for fame. She could be a thief, but she doesn't dare to rob the world. She is loyal and unwilling to serve the country. She is a thief who steals the country but is worried about her reputation. She is just a villain who looks ahead and thinks behind.

It's been a long time since I've seen such trashy Golden Chapter 3

Reading this book depends entirely on the subject matter, and I can only say that the subject matter was well chosen. Then the content is too slow, the writing is okay, but there are too many nonsense or even nonsense chapters. Less than half of the first dozens of chapters are useful. When you read it, you can read ten lines at a time without affecting your reading at all. I can only say that the more I watch it, the more disappointed I become. If membership is free, I can still watch it, but the fee is totally not worth it. In particular, the biggest poisonous point is that the protagonist does not travel through time. Not to mention the contingency of history, without any external interference, changing history is the biggest logical problem. So I want to ask, what is the meaning of using so many words to understand one's life experience? It's interesting to travel directly through time, start planning from a young age and not follow? Instead of acting like a fool who doesn't understand anything and has no opinion at all.

I spent the money to see the great Han Dynasty restored. It was the descendants of Zhaolie who worked hard to achieve the great Han Dynasty three times, not to play political tricks with a group of psychopaths and all kinds of corrupt officials. Watching all kinds of disgusting dramas.

When Liu Bang, the emperor of the Han Dynasty, first established the empire, no one knew how long the empire would last, whether it was the careerists in the opposition or the noble officials in the court, including the emperor of the Han Dynasty himself. Maybe it would disappear a hundred years after the death of the emperor of the Han Dynasty, maybe it would disappear in the second year after the death of the emperor of the Han Dynasty. Who knows? People only know that this empire will probably not last forever. After all, the last empire that claimed to be passed down from the First Emperor to all eternity has already died in the second generation. What a strange country this is! Institutionally, the Han Dynasty not only had the counties and counties that the Qin State was keen to reform, but also retained the feudalism passed down by the Shang and Zhou Dynasties, but the emperor's subordinates used the skills of Huang Lao; culturally, the Han Dynasty was steeped in the romantic and fantasy witchcraft style of the Chu region, but it did not lose the wandering habits of the Three Jin Dynasties, and there were often Confucian scholars who were loyal and filial piety to pray for the people. From all angles, these elements were incompatible, and the Han Dynasty should have been difficult to maintain, but it survived and maintained this delicate balance through the succession of four generations of emperors.

The monarch in the protagonist's imagination must be a morally perfect person, must be a Liu Bei-like figure, and it is revealed that in the author's eyes, the root cause of the situation in the late Jin Dynasty is moral and German injustice. This idea is no different from the poor scholar who dropped his book bag in ancient times. It seems that everyone can go back to the ancient times and the people are simple and the world can be governed. The protagonist's stubborn personality has basically no impact on the general trend of history. If he is not the "protagonist", it is difficult to imagine how to rebuild China.

1 I can understand it without having to explain so much. 1 The content of the chapter is too little and it's all narration. 2 Did people tell you that you can't start with children when writing novels? (Except for adult mind time travel) How do you write this to let readers get into 3? Golden Chapter 3 is written in the same way as history (I only saw Chapter 15, but I think it will be like that later)

It is quite friendly to fans of Ji Han. Starting from the childhood of the male protagonist, the shadow of his old friend can be seen everywhere in the text. It's a pity that time has passed and the stars have changed, and the style of the ancestors has become "unspeakable", leaving only a handful of embers lingering in the new dynasty. The writing is very gentle, but the background of the story is ruthless and cold, which combines into a wonderful epic charm, like the wheels of history rolling forward. It does not depend on personal will, but only leaves lasting echoes in the years. I didn't know much about the history of the Jin Dynasty. I thought I wouldn't be able to understand it, but I didn't expect it to get out of hand. In the Jin Dynasty, where loyalty, benevolence, and righteousness completely collapsed, the protagonist could still maintain his behavioral principles. He had been shaken and confused, but the dirty world did not destroy his beliefs, and the corrupt situation never penetrated his bottom line. It was obviously a relatively unfamiliar background to me, but I could vaguely see the legacy of Zhao Lie in the hero's behavior; coupled with my special feelings for Ji Han, I almost cried while reading some chapters, and tied it in two days. Although, I personally feel that the treatment of green beads is a bit emmmmm, but everyone has different opinions. And even though the relevant plot is a bit difficult to comment on in my opinion, overall it is still full of flaws, and the advantages far outweigh the shortcomings.

The subject matter is well chosen. After the protagonist's identity is set as Liu Bei, the grandson of An Le Gong Liu Chan is also very attractive. However, what you wrote is too literary and youthful. The quality of writing lies in the storytelling, not the rhetoric. It's impossible to write a book if you're too self-indulgent. If you can't resonate with people, it's better to have nothing at all.

Is it necessary to be so literary? Just scribble there just to show off your bad writing skills. Is it putting the cart before the horse?