Lords of the Heavens

Each of the characters in the Lazy Bird book has thousands of back-ups. The plot never grows on a tree. Basically, the tree grows a little, and then the tree is cut down and other trees are planted. The level of power is extremely exaggerated. In the early stage, you punch me and I kick you. In the early and middle stages, you raise your hand and convert billions of tons of matter into pure energy to strike. In the early and middle stage, there must be something like ascension. When you enter a high-energy world, how high-energy is it? The entire world converted into energy in the early stage is probably a handful of high-energy world. Then it's ascending, and the plot is divided every time you fly. I've never seen the ending of Lazy Bird's books. Usually they are pretty good in the early stages, and then the whole world explodes on the spot, as if I've stubbed my toe.

Against all odds, the protagonist Qu Wen is so holy. No matter if someone wants to kill him or exploit him, he will pretend it never happened and forgive unconditionally. Then he has saved many times the person who wanted to kill him and was exploiting him. The main character is a cow-horse who likes to feel aggrieved and exploited. The more you exploit him, the happier he will be. The key is that there are still a lot of Machiavellian parts, but the protagonist is written by the author as an ordinary person, who communicates in all aspects, and is submissive. He has no other advantages. Ah, yes, of course there is, that is kindness, and unconditional kindness to everyone. In the Machiavellian novel, you wrote that the protagonist is a fool and an awesome person.

The protagonist of the plot is a paid bully, and this thing has a 9-point rating. Who is giving it a 5-star rating? There were less than 10 pictures, and he was already poisoned and died. The purchase list is really good.

The closer you get to the back, the harder it becomes to watch. According to the author's description, ordinary people will be eaten until their bones are left. Those without an IQ of 120 will not be able to play at all, and there will be no sense of immersion at all. And even if you don't substitute, the writing is not very good. You have to write all kinds of intrigues and at the same time write the protagonist as an ordinary person, which always makes the protagonist suffer in various ways. What are you trying to write? Just write a protagonist with an awesome halo?

The author's distribution system and the protagonist's bizarre choice leave people speechless.

How did this stupid article get such a high score? It starts out as a family farming survival story. If you set the house to be built, you will get 1,000 experience, and then get the corresponding experience through the progress gain ratio. For example, old players will continue to increase their experience ratio due to previous experience, reducing the protagonist's income. But your direct treatment requires money, and food costs money, turning the relationship of common survival into a relationship of competition. The protagonist is also a fool, so he keeps enduring it. It would be better to kill them all and turn collective survival into individual survival.

1. The content is not tense or exciting and the pace is slow. 2. The male protagonist, the Holy Mother, is worried about changing the status quo. The two other players launched a plot to kill the protagonist and did not fight back. They continue to maintain the status quo and endure the turtles. Make the protagonist feel aggrieved, resigned, and a doormat. 3. In the previous world, the nominal mother and sister of the protagonist initiated a plot killing of each other. The protagonist acted as a wall and chose to refuse both sides to maintain the status quo, which offended both parties. It was obvious that both parties voted to kill each other through plot killing. The protagonist's sister initiated a plot killing against the protagonist, and the protagonist's mother also voted for it. The protagonist was surprised. What's weird about this thinking, haven't the two sides voted for plot killing each other before? Why can't we vote for the protagonist and compromise based on the protagonist's weakness? The other two parties can change the status quo carelessly.

Three Golden Chapters, specially selected 🐢, only suitable for 🐢 reading

There is no sense of empathy at all, and the more I watch, the more frustrated I feel.

It's all about criticizing the protagonist, and it has a 9.1 Rating. The author is really great.