Hogwarts is Both Science and Magic

1. There is no basis for determining a person's character like Dumbledore based on a setting in the movie or book. Regardless of the character description in the movie or book, he is an old man full of wisdom. The author must have forgotten to distinguish the old bee in old age from the young bee. The author writes more like a middle-aged old bee. The lack of wisdom is also accompanied by recklessness. 2. There are too many descriptions of the Black family. You can use less description. Some people may not be able to understand the ink marks when watching it. 3. The pace of this book is not particularly good, sometimes fast and sometimes slow. There are some foreshadowings that should be described in more detail. 4. Setting issues. Only one of the twelve school board members said correctly that Malfoy and brown silk were not in the wand. I remembered correctly that Azkaban said it was in the young wizard. There were also a few innocuous mistakes. The author can buy an electronic copy online and compare it.

It's a rare book with strong logic. The quality is quite high, but there is no water mark. It can be seen that the author has polished it repeatedly. Later on, I felt that the protagonist gradually became darker, but it was not too abrupt. I also agree with what a book friend [Scarecrow] said. Some of the plots and foreshadowing in the book could be described in more detail. However, I think Blakely's description is okay. I can't say it too much. It's just right. After all, it's about identity and background. It's better to write it in detail, otherwise it may be difficult to explain later. Hermione's description is very good, but if she wants to be the heroine, she needs to be described at the same level. In short, it must be natural, and it must not be like accepting a tool RBQ, especially when it is clear that she will be accepted as an assistant later, don't be fooled. Little Red Hair feels it's a bit much, but it's okay, so I won't comment. Harry didn't write much, and maybe the author didn't have a good grasp of it. In this regard, the author was wiser. The White Devil is a bit suppressed. The 100-year-old LYB can't write it too recklessly, which is a bit subdued, forcing the protagonist to pretend. Although the plot requires the protagonist to use him to increase his reputation, he can't write the White Devil too passively. There is not much description of Voldemort and no evaluation. Snape's writing is very good, and the characters are relatively three-dimensional. All in all, it is a good book worth recommending.

Who can tell me if there is no heroine?

The writing is quite good, although it's a bit intellectually depressing to criticize Dumbledore, but it's still quite enjoyable to read.

Kyle's success today has a lot to do with his refusal to admit defeat. He was bullied by others when he was in school. If he hadn't refused to admit defeat, he might have become very weak now.

The name of this book is Hogwarts.

I think some overt and covert struggles may not exist at all. Just write a little is fine, but if you write too much, it will be a bit boring. When I write too much, I feel very verbose.

Update it, update it, add a few more chapters.

I've recently become obsessed with Harry Potter fanfics, and this book really suits my taste.

Beautiful, but too slow