Comics: When Rorschach Became Batman

Some might think the protagonist is too cruel, but that's the way to deal with those villains. First of all, Batman does not have any "no-kill principle". As early as the era of Batman's creation, the editorial department did not design any "no-kill principle" for Batman, because the scale of the comics industry was very large at that time. Batman, like other heroic characters, treated criminals without mercy and killed them when they should. It's just that Batman was advertised as a detective comic at the beginning, so you rarely see Batman killing people. But only "few", not "none". It wasn't until due to parents' reports and influence issues that the mainstream media began to impose restrictions on comics. In addition, the market for hero comics gradually became saturated. In order to cope with the convergence of comics laws and other hero markets, the main creative staff began to reset Batman. This was the so-called "no-kill principle" of Batman. Batman's "no-kill principle" has many considerations. 1. A good adaptation of the restrictions of the Comics Act, so that Batman's story can be released normally without modification. 2 In the highly homogenized superhero market, Batman, who has the "no-kill principle", is well distinguished from other heroic characters. He has different characteristics from other heroes, until this feature becomes Batman's representative feature, so that when the "no-kill principle" is mentioned, the heroic image of Batman can be thought of. 3 In comics, with the "no killing principle", countless villains that readers like can appear repeatedly, without having to worry about designing new villains. As the saying goes, "saving is worth a hundred million." 4 The characteristic of the "no-kill principle" gives the hero Batman an extremely complex character connotation, deepening the complexity of Batman as a heroic character. Therefore, around this theme, some great gods were inspired to create classics such as "Kingdom of Heaven Comes". They focused on the "superhero's principle of not killing" and fully discussed the complex duality of being a hero.

A very good work, the author completely understands the extreme heroic character of Rorschach. Rorschach is not afraid of moral kidnapping and moral dilemmas at all: in front of the trolley problem, others may think about whether to pull the lever to save more or better people; but if it is Rorschach, he will definitely run to the trolley track to stop the trolley, even if he will be hit and killed immediately, he will not compromise. In Watchmen, the heroes are all more or less deficient. But if anyone is closer to justice itself, it must be Rorschach.

It was indeed a Rorschach at first, but the more the book was written, the more twisted it became. The original selling point of this book was Rorschach's character, but the writer thought it was because he had written it so attractively, and distorted his own thinking about Rorschach's setting, so he wrote a rubbish Rorschach before and after it was released. So the attraction is gone

What did you write in the first few chapters? What are the names? Sometimes this and sometimes that.

It will definitely get better tomorrow, it won't get worse after all, right...

No matter how you write it, you are still a fucking mortal... Go and have fun with Zod?

Continue to listen to music turned into seeds and look forward to the next one.

The main character is a psychopath, and there's a little bit of Rorschach, and a little bit of Bruce Wayne.