Paper Fruit in One Piece

Let me finish by telling you my personal opinions. The ending alone is quite worth watching. Although it is freeing oneself, it is very imaginative and it is not a collapse. After all, the original work is still unfinished, which is much better than the unfinished version of The Eunuch. The rest is generally unremarkable. At first, I thought the fruit power was pretty good (but I wasn't very interested in it since I started playing White Knight Clone. Also, the fact that the protagonist has a navy identity and a Celestial Dragon identity is a highlight. I personally don't like these two points very much. After all, I don't think there are many good One Piece fans who like to read it, but I finished reading it intermittently) and then the book and the ship flow (I still prefer this kind of pirate style). After all, you are watching a One Piece fan, not a fan of Marine King) and the protagonist mainly relies on fruit abilities to fight, (the ending will involve the author's original part), there is no system, the heroine Nami (I feel that if you write CP in One Piece, it is better not to confirm the relationship too early, after all, the original work is still very rare in this aspect) and the ending part is very imaginative. The author wrote that the original work was gone before Wano Country and Kaido fought, resulting in the bad guy who was transformed from the magic to be a bit ridiculous. In the end, I can give it about 7 points, mainly because I think the ending is good, and I would like to add some interesting points or surprises: following the ship, no system, with CP, the heroine Nami, having a navy identity (which is quite influential for the whole book) and a Celestial Dragon identity (a slight impact, I use it to brush my face and occasionally mention it). Ace died and was saved again, and the writing is average

Nothing special 😑

One thing to say, the author's imagination is quite good, and the development of paper fruits is also quite good. The final ending is also very imaginative, which is not bad. Although there are two or three flaws, there are no poisonous points. I will give it at least a medium-to-high rating.

I think there is absolutely no need to read those so-called dislikes of following boats in the comment section, because the author's introduction clearly states that they just follow boats. I'm not forcing you to read. It's okay if the introduction is not written. The introduction is very clear. I have to click in to take a look. Then when I see Chuanchuanliu, I just click on one and don't like it. I'm going to go. What does this mean?