Yongli Four Years

Get ready to read and wait for the real book review

The protagonist's personality should change, otherwise it will be a bit too abrupt later on! From the front, the protagonist is a bit weak and wants to unite with the majority, but is tricked by pig-like teammates! "Seek unity through struggle, and unity will survive; seek unity through compromise, and unity will perish." I think the protagonist should also realize this! Even if there is unity, there is also the question of who leads whom. Besides, it is still a bit too weak for those gentry! In times of trouble, how to solve this problem can refer to how the current government treated the landlords and tyrants in difficult times! I don't know if the author has read "Ye Ming". I think the protagonist's ideas in it can be used as a reference. The emperor is unreliable, the bureaucrats are unreliable, and the gentry are even more unreliable. Only when the people wake up can it be possible to fight against the Manchus. Therefore, for the gentry, there is no need to be too weak, nor do you need to care too much about their opinions. Only with firm determination to lead the people can victory be achieved!

If you don't rebel if you wear it clean, thousands of people will stab you in the chrysanthemum

Isn't it? Can the water be washed even if the water is too cold? Isn't it? Isn't it?

"Clear Barnyard Banknotes?" It is recorded in "Titles" that "Sir" is an honorific title only used by officials in the Qing Dynasty. It started in Yongzheng. Those with second rank or above could be treated as "Sir". After the Qianjia period, it began to spread, and an official would regard himself as "Sir". In the Ming Dynasty, people respected officials by calling them "Master". It was also used by the cabinet ministers and governors at first, but later it became widespread. When addressing a military officer, just "general" or "ye" is sufficient. For an officer, in addition to "general", the guerrilla can be addressed as "yourong", the deputy general as "fu rong", the general as "general army", or "commander", "marshal" or "military gate" plus "supervisor of military affairs" as "commander". "Master" can be used as long as the person is above Qianzong.

I'm very surprised, what era are we in now? There are still so many people who like to praise the constitutional monarchy, and that's all. The key is that this monarch is not the one who conquers the world. Isn't this making enemies for himself, so that the enemies can kill him without a body and cut off his descendants?

If The Deer and the Cauldron had been released this year, Mr. Jin would have been scolded and sent to the hospital. The same would have happened with those Qing Dynasty dramas, which would have been released two years later.

Each chapter contains a large amount of historical data mixed with word count, and the protagonist is a loser. I can't stand it when I see the protagonist writing a Titanic script in order to recruit a man named Li Xianlu.

The army was defeated, the general was captured, and people were panicked. At this time, you disperse part of the army to fight guerrillas, and you are sure that they will not return home or escape or surrender! The protagonist is under the arrangement of the author, but all his actions are taken for granted.

You're also rebuilding the Qi family army. Why, you want to hand over your power to someone else to be a nanny? Moreover, Qi Jiajun is what the people call it. It's okay for ordinary people to shout. If you want to shout it yourself, you are seeking death.

He died of poison in five chapters, no wonder no one read it

If you are really good at fighting, describe it once for yourself, once for the enemy, and again for the soldiers. Each time, start with the protagonist.

There are too many historical materials mixed together, just like copying history books, large fragments are picked up. Can't watch

There are many problems with the writing of this book. The biggest one is that the protagonist travels to ancient times, works in ancient times, and lives in ancient times. However, he often adds some modern and unconventional things, such as colonies, Wei Xiaobao, pyramid schemes, etc., Etc., Which makes people laugh every minute.

This is a typical starting point. It is obvious that the essence of the matter cannot be seen. He only sees contingency and cannot see the inevitability. The author is obviously not too smart.

Halfway through the book, Cao Conglong's betrayal, the protagonist's rebellion and the disposal of the others are still feudal slaves. How can I put it, the writing is good, but this book is a time travel book, not the original time and space, but it is still a feudal slave in practice, and suddenly I don't want to read it.

I really can't stand it anymore, such a naive time traveler still wants to rebel against the Qing Dynasty? He can't even be a warlord, he really relies on words to destroy the Tatars.

It's very sad that patriotic education now only depends on the starting point. The so-called patriotic education when I was studying now seems to be mostly nonsense. Apart from long talks, it is just like chewing wax and has no feeling.

Really convinced, the development of Chinese and Western firearms are completely different. Bird guns are less powerful, more accurate, and have a longer range, while Western matchlocks are more powerful, less accurate, and have a shorter range. The Manchus generally had double-layered cotton armor that could not be penetrated by muskets, not to mention the three-eyed muskets used by the Northerners that had a range that was nearly twice as short as bows and arrows. The Manchus also plundered craftsmen and worked hard to build artillery, so it was not surprising that they were defeated in the field.

If you have a gun, you don't have to play with knives. If you don't climb the technology tree, you have to play with passion. Rumi guns have been built, hydraulic milling machines and forging machines are available, but you still have to play with knives. I am speechless.

It can be seen that the author is very thoughtful and wants to write a research article and to be consistent with historical facts. To put it bluntly, the author's writing style cannot handle such detailed data. The author's description of the protagonist and the description of historical facts can reach a level of one to one, or even one to two. This makes me read this article like watching another documentary, but it is difficult for me to empathize. In addition, I want to complain about the author. The author's description of flattery makes my hands and feet numb. It is understandable that the author wants to reflect the importance of the protagonist, but when it comes to flattery, many of the descriptions feel very... Difficult to empathize with. The protagonist got a good ranking in the early military exercises, and everyone colluded to prevent him from going to the battlefield. The confession in this scene actually appeared three times. The summary of the battle by three people with different statuses was to praise the protagonist's bad feet. I can understand that there are such people, but are all people like this? Is this how everyone reflects on this battle? It feels as if Song Jiaoren comes to life and everything goes well for China. However, the author's courage to conduct such detailed research is commendable. The writing style can be tempered and the techniques can be changed, but the attitude towards writing is extremely difficult to change. I will persist in reading this book and look forward to updates on the author's writing style in his new work.

When I go back in time, I just look at you, Luo Li. No matter how exciting it is later, it's useless. I was told to quit earlier.

How stupid is this protagonist? He doesn't even know how to be on guard when a waiter comes. He's as stupid as a dog.

I was very happy to find a novel about the late Ming Dynasty. When I read the comments, they were all scolding me, so I gave it up without any good reviews.

In the late Ming Dynasty, the Qing army used the Spanish phalanx to fight you even if they died.

Chen Wen, the protagonist, would not be without his own intelligence network.

Personally, I still think that whether it is a constitutional monarchy, feudalism, capitalism, republicanism, or socialism, after all, if officials are not honest, it will be the common people who suffer in the end. The author's doctrine is fine. The first thing should be to activate the people's wisdom throughout the country and learn to protect individuals' own interests.

The writing is good, but the writing is really rubbish. Many places are just conjecture, which is too far from reality.

Taking the example of Zhang Xianzhong being killed by a sniper, Ruan Jin is reminded to be careful. If Hengshuiyang does not lose at one stop, Zhoushan can be saved. It will be of great benefit to the protagonist.

I wrote it too hastily in the later stage The sentence "cannons roared towards the Forbidden City" was gone.