A Lifetime of Wealth

I have never written a book review after reading a novel before, because reading novels, especially online novels, is entertainment and pastime, and the good and bad will pass by. The reason I had to write it this time was because the author was disgusted. The point of view on the novel is a family opinion. I won't scold you because I think you are cheating on me. At most, I will not read it. The reason why I didn't abandon the book is that I read it late and subscribed to the whole book. In order not to waste money, I endured reading it. Facts have proved that there is no need to feed yourself shit just for a few dollars. I would also like to advise readers who have not seen the second half of the book to just subscribe to the protagonist's obeisance + the last chapter, so that the story and the author's point of view are completely taken into account. As for the remaining dozens of pictures, the author basically talks about his set of points of view over and over again, nagging, going around, and endlessly. The author's point of view has its merits, and there are also points that I agree with. There are some points that I personally think are still open to discussion. This is harmless and normal. Some fans have read few books, have never read any classics, let alone large works, so when they saw the author's summarized and coherent views, they were immediately shocked and felt that they were really rare talents who, for the sake of truth, presented There is a superstitious mentality of worshiping idols. It is often this group of fans who quarrel and curse with others in the book review section, and the words they say are illogical, childish and ridiculous, commonly known as "brainless fans". I am going to criticize this group by name. You are welcome to take a seat. Returning to this book, let's compare it with another well-known novel of the same type, "Zhi Zhi Tian Xia". The story of this book is okay in the early and middle stages, but it is not as good as "Zi Zhi Tian Xia". It also contains some inexplicable time travel benefits and golden fingers. Considering that the author implies that the horse-drawn train in "Zhi Zhi Tian Xia" is ignorant, then it is half and half. Both books have bug bonuses. As a time travel historical novel, for the sake of fun, I will not be harsh. Regarding the war drama, neither book is good, so it's a tie. In terms of life drama, this book obviously has the poverty of a young intellectual. I wanted to write about red roses and white roses, about childhood sweethearts, and about forgetting each other, but it is not at this level and pretends to be stupid. On the other hand, "The Ruler of the World" is about being respectful and plain, which is not disgusting. The struggle drama is basically not felt in this book. The " The Ruler of the World" is obviously much more brilliant, especially an emperor's stroke and a court coup, wonderful! Regarding the connotation of viewpoints, the author of this book has his own set of viewpoints. He himself should have read a certain amount of books, but his philosophical viewpoints are obviously mechanical. In many places, as a historical downstream, historical issues are viewed in isolation, and there is a bad habit of the historical inventor Yuan, who likes to make history to prove his viewpoints. And in the later period, people went crazy, using the platform of online novels to pour out their opinions to paying readers. Regardless of the level of your opinions, your approach did not even have any professional ethics. If you want to talk, just go and set up a group for people who are willing to listen. Your idiot fans are willing to read your "literary" things, but other readers are not willing. You criticize so many minor literati and "witch Confucians" in your articles. What does your own approach mean? If you are really confident in your own story, just add the information at the front of your post in an upright and upright manner as you have always emphasized. What you added in the post-paid article is "Which god can you invite to suppress the ghost in your heart?"

Before I read the paid chapter, I saw that the writing of Liu Xiaomei was really delayed. Is it possible to write both of them to death, and kill one to let the other grow? It's so funny. Is the role of Xiu Xiu important? In this book? So far, she's just a maid. This paragraph is written with the feeling of a young man who doesn't know what it feels like to be sad, and it's superfluous to compose new words to describe the feeling of sadness. But to think that there will be a plot like this later will really make me sick to death.

I like to reason too much, especially in the later stages, which causes the plot to be choppy!

First of all, let me say that I really like the author's writing style and details However, I still feel that some places feel weird For example, with Xiuxiu and Liu Xiaomei, I agree with a statement in this chapter. The author's intention is good, but he did not write it out The author has this feeling of not writing it out in many places The protagonist feels like he has stopped abruptly when expressing his political views and positions many times. The process of discovering and solving problems is very good, but when it comes to analyzing problems and persuading others, I always feel a little unconvincing. As a reader, I can't understand it even if there is a narration to explain, let alone the people in the story. For example, Ouyang Xiu's place is particularly puzzling. Yes, maybe I, Ouyang Xiu, am wrong, but tell me where I am wrong. You always look good for me, but you still don't tell me what exactly I did wrong. You are exactly like the kind of parents who don't know how to educate.

This is the best Song Chuan novel I have ever read

To say that it is meticulous is actually to say that it is watery. The protagonist is an all-round man with a science background, he can handle agricultural machinery and military industry at his fingertips, he can speak in five words and seven rhymes, and the local government affairs are what the people want. After one year of sugar training in Lingnan, the income accounted for nearly 30% of the national tax revenue. This is doubtful. I have not done any research, so I will not talk about it for the time being. However, such a large input may be interrupted at any time by the invasion of the Southern Barbarians. The local garrison is only a few hundred. The protagonist is actually worried about whether it will mobilize a mere two thousand Hunan troops to guard the local court. Agree, combined with the previous article, more than 30 domestic servants can actually support the cultivation of thousands of acres of land, and the raising of thousands of cattle and sheep, and even farming, winemaking and fishing. At this point, I think everyone should have understood that the author's sensitivity to numbers, technology, politics, and even literature are too superficial. It is a pity that I have only read this book to chapter 50 of the third volume. However, there is a reason why this book, which is 5 million words long, seems tepid.

The style and depth of An Jun's "A Life of Wealth" is much better than most current online articles. The style is realistic and not procrastinating, and there is no arrogance like that of a pseudo-literary youth.

I read a few chapters and it was very toxic. Let's not talk about other things. First, I was influenced by the slave woman of the main character's mother, and then I was resented by this helpless old slave. Where did the slave get the courage? How dare a helpless old slave? It's a big joke that an old slave whose class is lower than an animal deceives his master... And peanuts and peppers? How come? Can we still stay together? Those are crops with different seasons... And the little maid is supported as a master. Can't you figure out the hierarchy? Slaves are slaves, challenge the strict feudal society with equality for everyone... Whimsical... So poisonous~

After reading the previous dozens of chapters, it's rubbish among rubbish, with no main line. The protagonist is an arrogant and short-sighted person. The funniest thing is that he thinks that farming alone is enough to protect his own wealth. This is a statement that modern people have lived through. Don't you still understand the social classes in ancient times? Don't you know that businessmen are just at the mercy of others? It's absolutely disgusting. I don't know why so many people are talking about it?

After the author apologized, he let himself go 🤭. You have to control yourself. It's not that novels can't make sense, it's just that they can't be told in this way. The so-called "articles are used to convey the Tao", why not write articles to discuss, preach and describe the Tao? There is a difference between "zai" and "lecture". When doing literature, we cannot treat readers as students, and we should read over and over again for fear of not being able to understand them thoroughly. A protagonist should indeed have a consistent path and must have his own three views and logic. But in the literary form of the novel, that is the process that operates behind the scenes. If the protagonist wants to do things and be a good person, he will naturally embody his Tao and his logic. The truth of a good novel is hidden, and the author treats the protagonist as carefully as gold. If it can be expressed clearly in the plot, it cannot be expressed in words. If it can be expressed clearly in one sentence, the second sentence will not be used. If it is expressed clearly in one place, it will not be repeated elsewhere. However, if you allow yourself to talk clearly in one breath, it is actually a kind of laziness, because you don't want to work hard to hide it in writing. Or ask why the novel is so awkward and doesn't explain the truth directly? That's because hiding can carry the Tao, but direct indoctrination cannot carry the Tao. It is precisely because of the hidden Tao that novels can have artistic appeal and truly promote your Tao. It's satisfying for you to preach, but can it really promote your message better than an interesting novel? Some readers have also said that we read these chapters not as novels, but as essays. Of course, a paper is also a text and a carrier of Tao. Moreover, there are naturally plots in novels or things that cannot be expressed in one or two sentences, which need to be discussed by the author. Many of the author's views do have merit, but are these chapters qualified argumentative essays? Neither. The reason why literature conveys the truth is not only the words, but also the structure and organization. To discuss the truth in the article, if you use narration, you need to divide it into categories, and if you use dialogue, you need to design and progress. In short, it needs to be designed. For such an important discussion chapter, it is necessary to write a draft, carefully organize it, add and delete it, make an overall design and then add it. It is not like the last few chapters, where I say whatever comes to mind, occasionally repeating the preface, and suddenly jumping thousands of miles away. Even after the historian recorded it and looked at it, the readers thought that the plot was going to be pushed forward, but the author felt that the story was not finished and continued to discuss it. Are you saying the author shouldn't have written this way? In fact, we readers have no position to say this. The author writes what he wants to write, and that is how he wants to write his "novel". We have nothing to criticize. But it is correct to write "author" this way, but it is wrong to write "novel" this way. The author can write this way, but the novel written this way is not good.

I got drunk after seeing this introduction. Can a small soldier also become an army commander? In the Song Dynasty, the commander of the army was a civilian official, and there was no difference between generals and soldiers. The military is a place where one doesn't care about one's origin. Are there few examples of soldiers becoming commanders from ancient times? To be honest, it's because Di Qing himself is awesome! In other times, Di Qing's achievements would have been even higher! Wu Mu himself was a member of the civil service group, and he was ostracized and despised for abandoning civil service and joining the military. He was drunk because he didn't understand that the author's introduction actually said that the conditions for promotion in the Song army were good. Starting from the Song Dynasty, only the imperial examination was used to select scholars, which was indeed good for small landowners and farmers, but for the army, forget it, the word "Qiu Ba" was enough

It is a rubbish book about giving away a girl to a girl. After the main character became an official, he could not finish a chapter. His newlywed wife left him at home for several years. The father-in-law gave the main character's dowry maid directly to his brother. After he was newly married and went out to work as an official for several years, he did not touch women when he met a woman and then gave it to his subordinates. The personal maid Xiuxiu was also brought out by the protagonist and left aside. She had been suffering from illness all year round.

The author's personal story is nonsense, and he attributes Yue Fei's death to the coercion of the Forbidden Army interest groups and is speechless. I also don't want to think about the fact that fighting a war consumes money and food, but without the support of the central government, we can make the people hungry without disturbing the cold without demolishing the houses.

Don't say anything else. Treat a thousand acres of land as flat and flat. Even if it is fully mechanized in 2024, when a thousand acres of land are busy, you will have to ask hundreds of people to help. How did the protagonist manage to produce a thousand acres of land with thirty people in ancient times?

Let me explain first, I admire this book very much. It is rare to find a good historical book with an engaging plot and an engaging rhythm. First of all, give the author a thumbs up! However, this theory that readers have been emphasizing in dozens of posts in recent times believes that the main reason why the Central Plains army lost its combat effectiveness after the Tang Dynasty was the introduction of the Hu military system. I think it is a bit extreme. If the introduction of the Hu military system alone caused the Central Plains army to lose its combat effectiveness, then the Hu army also adopted the Hu military system at that time. Why did the great Hu countries at that time, such as Liao and Xia, not lose their combat effectiveness? There is an argument that the author and I agree with. During the Han Dynasty, the armed forces of the Central Plains crushed the surrounding barbarians. There was a saying that one Han army was against five Huns. Chen Tang at that time had already explained the reason. It was because the Han people had advanced weapons, their swords were strong and sharp, and their crossbows were powerful. Those grassland barbarians didn't even have many iron weapons, so naturally they couldn't fight against the Han soldiers who were armed to the teeth. But since the Tang Dynasty, the military advantage of the Central Plains has declined rapidly. By the end of the Tang Dynasty and the Five Dynasties, it had been bullied by the Khitans. I personally think that this was mainly due to the large-scale technological export during the Tang Dynasty. Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty coveted the reputation of Tian Khan and regarded himself as the ruler of the Hu people. He spread the metal smelting technology of the Central Plains to the surrounding Hu people without reservation. In addition, the Tang army used a large number of Hu generals, so that the Hu people also learned the military system and organization of the Central Plains and used the weapons of the Central Plains. In terms of organization and armament, they were no less than those of the Central Plains. By the time of the Song Dynasty, the Zhuhus had occupied the horse-producing areas in the north, preventing the Song Dynasty from obtaining a large number of good war horses. They also lost the key point of Yanyun in Hebei Province, putting the Central Plains at a huge strategic disadvantage. Coupled with the slack caused by the long period of peace, this was the objective reason why the Song Dynasty could never cheer up. Of course, the Song Dynasty's pattern of using civil society over military affairs and the author's emphasis on the backwardness of the military system were also one of the reasons for the Song Dynasty's weakness, but it should not be the main reason. Otherwise, we cannot explain why the Shaanxi Forbidden Army in the Northern Song Dynasty was the most elite in the country and was far stronger than the Hebei Forbidden Army and the Capital Forbidden Army. Logically speaking, all the Imperial Guards across the country have the same system. However, the Shaanxi Forbidden Army is often on the front line of the confrontation with Xixia. They often have to fight and cannot slack off, so their combat effectiveness far exceeds that of other regions. The military system is really like a joke. The more advanced the military system is, the more effective it will be. Historically, Wanyan Aguda led 20,000 tribal soldiers to defeat the 400,000-strong army of Emperor Tianxi of the Liao Kingdom. Later, these barbarians went south to attack the Song Dynasty and easily destroyed the Northern Song Dynasty. The later Manchurian Eight Banners system was not an advanced system at all in terms of military system, but it was able to easily defeat neighboring advanced military countries such as Mongolia, Ming Dynasty and North Korea. And later in Mongolia, Genghis Khan's system of a hundred household heads and a team of ten thousand people was extremely simple and crude, but it was able to destroy the Jin and Song Dynasties, run rampant all over the world, and defeat Eurasia. When the barbarians first emerged, their vigorous vitality and aggressive wildness caused terrible destructive power. This is really unreasonable~~ In the cold weapon era, the role of the military system was not as great as imagined. The more important factors should be the physical fitness, bravery and armament of the soldiers~

The 8-year-old Xiu Xiu has more drama than his wife. Other big landowners have a bunch of book boys and maids. The maids will be the future supervisors, and the book boys are basically the housekeepers or captains of their own soldiers. The protagonist is an only child, and his parents are also one person. In ancient times, this meant that the family would disappear at any time. There were few servants around the protagonist who could live and die with him, and he often said that the banker could leave at any time, so a little maid should be treated as a modern woman. . . Vomited at the sight

This book is not good. First, it is about coquettishness, especially for showing off. Did she show off to you? If you have a wife who doesn't train her, but plays with the maid? The key is inexplicably good, what's the reason? It can't be a woman, right? You didn't show anything when they first arrived at your house, so why are you being nice to others? If he is pitiful and your family is not short of maids, you might as well just let him go. The second is that the views are always repeated. As for the relationship between a banker and the owner, it has been said no less than three times. You only need to say it once, really. The third is to be less cool. It feels good to make readers unhappy and you are excellent.

The author writes very carefully and thoughtfully, very well!

The first part was fine, but in the middle and later stages, I wrote a few things blindly. I went completely crazy for the sake of democratic representation.

I just finished watching the ending and I have something to say. This book is definitely a fairy tale, at least excluding the next two hundred chapters. I think the author is too obsessed and has even become a demon. In fact, I think this is good. It at least shows the author's thinking about the old society. This is where the book surpasses those cool articles. But the author's mentality has collapsed. I wonder if someone has questioned Xu Ping's governing philosophy before, so the author keeps trying to refute it? The biggest problem here is that the author only needs to let Xu Ping convince the ancients, and there is no need to convince us (I once read on Zhihu that the way the ancients argued things is not very similar to our logical reasoning based on modern scientific thinking) Furthermore, even if he wants to convince us, the author is not knowledgeable enough, or the argumentation method in the book is completely wrong. A novice who can be fooled by just one sentence should not follow this book. The logical reasoning method of modern scientific thinking is to first study something through scientific statistical methods, arrive at a set of basic theories, add existing theories to form an axiom system, and then see if it can be falsified (here, first of all, there must be no contradiction between the axioms, and then the various conclusions deduced from the axiom system must conform to the observations of the objective world). So it is very important that examples can only be used to falsify, not to prove the validity of the theory! ! ! Therefore, the author's way of argumentation is wrong. Then I think the author's understanding of ancient society and modern society has not reached the level of forming a complete set of scientific theories. Social science issues are not the time to just say one sentence. They also require complete steps of argumentation. You can look at the summary of old social classes and feudalism on Zhihu. Even if the arguments in such an article are so rich, it is just childish in front of a real academic. Modern society is becoming more and more segmented and specialized, and a layman's understanding of other industries is just a scratch. Therefore, the author casually talks about a truth or a theory, and we just listen to it casually. There is no need to really elaborate on the argument. I will definitely order the author's next book, but I hope that the author's inner demons will be eliminated soon. If you really want to publish your own theory, I suggest you go to Zhihu to talk about it. There are many professionals there, which can help discuss issues. Let me say it one last time, Marxism and materialism are not a simple textbook. If you want to criticize, read a few masterpieces first. The predecessors have summarized a lot about this, and we can see further by standing on their shoulders, right? Come on, author!

After reading two chapters, I really couldn't stand it. I hate the red tape everywhere in this kind of time travel story. It's enough to have so many etiquettes in front of the housekeeper and mother. There is also a problem of addressing people. In ancient times, wouldn't it be enough to just use mother's name? It seems awkward to use mother's name, but it takes a long time to explain when you use it. Author, don't you know you are writing a novel? Since it is neither a historical nor a literary work, is it necessary to write everything according to the regulations of the Song Dynasty? Not to mention that the various regulations and customs of the Song Dynasty hundreds of years ago cannot be fully understood by looking up information on the Internet. Even if you exhaust yourself to death and fully understand it, the novel completely conforms to the setting of the Song Dynasty, what is the use? We are here to see the story, not the setting. If you have the energy, it is better to write a more exciting story. The setting should be more or less the same. Don't copy it mechanically. Take Mr. Jin Yong's martial arts novels as an example. In them, all martial artists carry swords and travel around the world, killing people and setting fires. The government doesn't care at all. But in real history, let alone other things, walking in the world is impossible. Without government documents, unless in troubled times, ordinary people will not be able to travel far in their lives. If you are given so many rules and regulations, how can you write so many classic novels? Let's look at The Excellent Butler and Tang Brick. These classic novels only use history as their background.

... The protagonist's mother's attitude towards the protagonist is completely unlike someone who can dote on the protagonist. His own child was criticized by the servant, and he still helped the servant. It is strange that he could raise a playboy with this attitude.

Side Story-Dali Guoji It was already winter, but the trees in Dali City were still lush and green. A black figure flashed past the treetops and disappeared into the Gao family's huge mansion in a blink of an eye. Gao Zhisheng, the patriarch of the Gao clan, has just turned forty this year, but he is already the leading minister in Dali. It was only Yinshi, but he had already packed up and was sitting in the hall quietly waiting to go to court. The black shadow flew into the hall like a kite, and in a blink of an eye he knelt down in front of Gao Zhisheng. It was a handsome young man who was only more than ten years old, and it was Gao Zhisheng's legitimate son Shengtai. Gao Shengtai couldn't restrain the joy on his face and said to his father: "Congratulations, Sir, Yang agreed." Gao Zhisheng showed no expression on his face, nodded slightly, and said: "Where is Tianlong Temple?" Gao Shengtai showed a look of disdain and said: "Duan Suxing clings to the Song Dynasty and thinks he is great. He dares to covet the property of Tianlong Temple. Don't worry, sir, His Majesty Shengde has perished. Master Wu Rong of Tianlong Temple will help us." —————— Duan Suxing felt like he was trembling all over. The ministers headed by the Gaoyang clan in the court showed a rare "backbone", and they all "offended and remonstrated". The bald donkey of Tianlong Temple also acted aggressively, saying that he wanted to abdicate his own lineage and make way for the worthy, so that the descendants of Taizu could sit on the throne of the emperor again. Seeing the sneer look on the face of Monk Wu Rong of Tianlong Temple, Duan Suxing became even more angry. He suddenly pulled out the sword from his waist and struck him in the chest with the "Xuan Zang Xi Lai" gesture. But when Wu Rong smiled slightly and flipped his right thumb, Duan Suxing felt the tiger's mouth heat up, and the sword flew out of his hands. It left a scar on his face, and the donated blood trickled down.

This book is really an unexpected surprise. The first echelon of historical literature. Ruizhi Tianxia is the number one book about the history of the Song Dynasty in my heart, and it is also the number one historical text. This book is also a history of the Song Dynasty, but with a different perspective and a very delicate writing style. In addition to this is Shao Song, which is a different angle and heroic. In short, Qidian actually has few excellent historical texts. This one is not popular, but it is indeed an excellent book. Let people feel the life of that dynasty.

Since I am following the logical route, I would like to think of a normal man, who has just been married, has great power, and has been in seclusion for 6 years. Is the story about an eunuch? Is the author a man? He has no basic knowledge of men's psychology.

In the first few chapters, I was obsessed with a girl who was less than ten years old, and I wrote several pictures. It was poisonous!

Say a few words too. It's really a pity to see the author say that he will no longer write long paragraphs of discussion. Who says novels can only tell stories? Take a look at modern masterpieces such as "War and Peace". The reason why a masterpiece becomes a masterpiece is that it analyzes and dissects society and human nature on the basis of telling a good story, and there is no right or wrong in this analysis and dissection. The reason why I have been following this book and switched from reading pirated copies to subscribing to reading (it is also the only book I subscribe to and read) is precisely because of this book's anatomical analysis of this era, this period of history and its formation. I suggest the author not to give up this writing style easily. I think those who stay here are not necessarily those who want to read cool articles.

How dare a local government claim to be powerful?

There are so many poisonous points that I really can't stand it.

Well, the writing is not bad, but what's the sudden embarrassment and the logic?