Hunting Rome

It's too outrageous. Hundreds of people fought against 2,000 people. Few of them were killed, but the enemy was defeated. The enemy's 300 heavy cavalry hadn't even appeared yet, so they surrendered and said they had heavy cavalry... Rubbish, too many poison points.

After reading Chapter 113, most of the poisonous points are bearable, but a group of Arabian horse bandits in Chapter 113 actually believe in Christianity??? Wasn't the Arab region all Zoroastrian at that time? Qin Dong is dead and Grandpa Muhammad has not been born yet. Where did the *** religion come from???

I didn't want to read it at the beginning. The author didn't study history? What about Attila the Hun, his younger brother who was crippled by half-broken Rome? Houyi of the Xiongnu is Hungary? You can really clear the water army

First of all, the protagonist's curiosity is too strong. If it weren't for the halo surrounding him, he would have been killed long ago. Secondly, the protagonist's skills are not explained enough. You must know that whether it is horse fighting or mounted archery, they are skills that require years of training. Why can the protagonist master them all at once? Third, the cavalry archers are too exaggerated. Yes, cavalry archers are very strong, but they are not without weaknesses. First of all, training is very difficult. Even if they are natural cavalry like the Mongols, not everyone has the talent to become a cavalry archer. Secondly, it can only be used in plain field battles. For sieges, mountain battles or hilly areas, mounted archers are of little use. Finally, cavalry archers do not restrain infantry. On the contrary, if they are well-trained infantry equipped with crossbowmen, cavalry archers are actually restrained. Because the range of horse-mounted archery is far inferior to that of infantry archery, and the armored infantry who are trained to be fast are not afraid of mounted archery. In addition, considering the cost of horses and bows and arrows, mounted archers are a very expensive unit and training is also very difficult.

The world is diverse, and only diversity is more colorful. In this way, our civilization can look at itself, tolerate the good things of others, and discard the bad things of others. If everyone is the same, what if we take the wrong path to civilization one day in the future?! What if I go wrong? Also, I don't understand why Westerners must be allowed to live according to the Chinese way? Don't you know that we Chinese are pigs and Westerners are bullshit?! If you ask Westerners to follow our Chinese lifestyle, they will definitely change to eating pork! The global consumption of pork is bound to increase significantly. Will the price of pork increase?! Then we still eat shitty pork?!

Does the author have some historical knowledge?

Just reading the title and introduction, I can't help but have this feeling: YY should be upright and upright, and it is much better than the fake YY and pseudo-historical theories that pretend to be serious. This is what makes me so happy. In addition, the author must have a huge reserve of historical knowledge. The article Every detail in the novel is meticulous. Unfortunately, I am not an angry young man, and I cannot bear to tolerate the behavior of all those who protect others and show off their superiority, so I want to make a satire. (Don't these kinds of articles count as YY? All historical novels must have some respect for history, otherwise I won't be able to read them at all). In addition, I strongly recommend the author to write a story about "Hunting Goguryeo". If Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty conquered Goguryeo three times with a million-strong army and failed to defeat it, you must be filled with shame. Don't you need to be healed? Oh, and also, are the Xiongnu in your work positioned as Chinese, or are they Han Chinese?? You must know that there are quite a few people who want to explode and die when mentioning the so-called "Qing court", "Hulu" and the like. You are so proud of the Hulu people, are you not afraid of offending them? It should be noted that Dung Qing has a large audience for such books. Seriously, the so-called Chinese farming civilization has nothing to do with nomadic civilizations such as the Huns and Huru. Why don't you ask for their consent before engaging in sex?

It seemed pretty good, except for the steamed buns, beer, and all the messy things. To be honest, I was so embarrassed when I read it. I kept deleting and adding it, and I had to be silent for a long time while watching it. To put it bluntly, patriotism is very good, but it is useless, from the inside out, right? I read too much fictional history about my country and it hurts me. There are some good ones but only about a dozen or so. The Overthrow of the Han and I like classical Chinese the most. I don't know. Hanxiang. I need to think about it. Wait. The main reason is that there are too many imitations. I can sum up several types, such as system plug-ins, collective intelligence reduction, sudden change of painting style, hard farming, or beating, harvesting, various reforms and modifications. Anyway, there are no difficulties to create difficulties, no miracles, artificial seed explosion, verbal abuse, maximal civil and military strengthening, etc. Now I know the content just by looking at the chapter title. Is there any good one? Quite often, there is always a reason for not wanting to look at the situation. It's nothing, I always think too much suddenly. The kind of movies that I find interesting are definitely interspersed with tragic descriptions, and the ones that I couldn't stand after watching half of them are the ones above.

🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄

It's well written. I ordered it directly. Some details can be described, and some economic issues and farming issues can also be highlighted to increase the sense of immersion.