Way of Augustus

There is no doubt that it is T0 in the western fantasy historical fiction category. From the very beginning of following the update to watching it over and over again, the characters are three-dimensional and full, and the story is compact and all-encompassing. Xiaobai persuades me to quit, and it is not suitable for reading by Xiaofeiqing who has no social accumulation. Even though the protagonist is a modern college student with family and history, he feels deeply powerless in the face of the post-transcendence social structure. He is struggling and growing at every step. Thanks to the author for giving me a basic understanding of the Roman Republic to the Empire through this book, which in turn made me interested in further thinking👍👍👍

The book is well written, but the author tries desperately not to change history, which makes the book much less readable. For example, the street revolutionary technology that the protagonist brought to Rome, the soldier committees that he brought to the Roman legion, not to mention the stirrups and papermaking technology that were deliberately not mentioned (how did the protagonist do the horse assault in Spain?). In fact, Lepidus' modified vehicle cannon, which has already appeared and matured, is enough to change the long-range firepower efficiency of the Roman legion. In order not to change history, Crassus must have died during the expedition to Parthia. The problem is that with Lepidus' change, as long as they did not cross the desert and lacked drinking water and fortification materials, the Parthian army had no chance at all. The most uncomfortable part is, why does the author have to let the protagonist replace the historical Lepidus? Let the protagonist always be Caesar's lieutenant? Do we have to wait until Caesar is assassinated in 43 BC to change the history of being defeated by Octavian? In fact, the protagonist of the time traveler performed much better than Caesar in Rome, but the author refused to change history, so he had to continue to be the grandson. It was really baffling. A very sad book.

It is said that Tuna is really the protagonist's great benefactor. If he had not allowed the winter camp and drove away the slave traders who followed the army, the protagonist would have been sold to an unknown place by the money-hungry Heibrida, where would he have survived until the day he was liberated by the military tribune. What Tuna did made him unpopular (in the military), but it helped the protagonist a lot.

It would be a miracle if this book didn't fail. Anyone who can persist through the first volume is a master. This book is used by the author for his own pleasure. The writing is okay in terms of smoothness, but the protagonist, who is a pure passerby, has all the shortcomings, except that the author gave him an aura of immortality. The author is indirectly slapping the readers crazy in the face.

After reading Chapter 10, I really can't stand it anymore. Reading the reviews, this book was popular before, so I can only say that times have changed. I don't think there's anything wrong with being an abusive master, but I'm really intolerable to the contradictory character of the protagonist. Here's my point of view: The protagonist travels back in time to become a slave, which is indeed a lowly occupation. For example, being beaten by the centurion Hebrida without the ability to fight back, being thirsty and enduring the humiliation of drinking horse urine, are all very detailed depictions. Shielding and helping the princess Adiana and the female slave Poti can also be understood as modern people's attention to female boxing. After all, it is the first time for a time traveler to hesitate to take action on the battlefield. I have even seen people who almost lost their lives because of hesitation, which is understandable. Unacceptable point: Seven or eight of the first 10 chapters turned out to be about other people's stories. It is true that the protagonist's low status now cannot affect the overall situation, but is this the reason for not writing about the protagonist? I didn't see the identity transformation and psychological struggles from modern people to slaves, and the specific actions that made people a bit prestige among slaves. I only saw the author's historical process in Barabala, and the stories with several women. To put it bluntly, it was just the author's self-pleasure. If you say this is about group portraits, that's fine. Just think of it as historical science. I haven't read it before. The most unbearable thing is that the protagonist has no intention of fighting back in front of the centurion. Let him go when the secret crown incident can kill the centurion in one go. Let him go? You've already written that Hebrida is a vulgar and unrestrained soldier. How do you still expect him to treat you well in the future? I don't know if this person will be a famous general or something in the future, but there will be no one to cooperate with except him? On the contrary, he became stubborn in front of women. After all, he and the princess had shared the same troubles. However, after she regained her identity, she stopped holding back, contradicted, had troubles, and flirted. To put it bluntly, even if the princess said to kill the slave on the spot, could the protagonist resist? Everyone knows that the protagonist's character will change, but I cannot accept this contradictory character description. I also warn future readers, if you don't like self-abuse, don't fall into this trap.

Watch Cicero. Historically, while this man was receiving favors from Caesar (his younger brother was in the Gallic army), he was flirting with the anti-Caesar forces; while he and Caesar were bragging about each other's achievements in Latin literature, he was dreaming of the political dream of the father of the motherland. He fled with Pompey, but turned back to Rome on the way; when he heard that Caesar had been assassinated, he hurriedly got close to the anti-Caesar faction; while preventing the knights from lending money to Octavian, he was overwhelmed by the latter's few compliments... I hope the author can open up and kick him out to do some cosmetic things, and don't let him die like in history. In addition, there is another thing. At this stage in the book, the Roman calendar (a lunar calendar) still used in Rome has a large error and is very confusing. It has a relatively negative impact on navigation. For example, the Mediterranean is not suitable for sailing in winter, but it is annoying when winter starts and ends according to the calendar. Later, Caesar revised the ancient Roman calendar and formulated the Julian Calendar (Julian Calendar) based on the advice of the astronomer Sosigenes of Alexandria, Egypt.

The author goes to great lengths to prove that contemporary college students are trash

This kind of literary youth abuse article, the author is so proud of himself, how many audiences can he have?

After reading more than a dozen chapters, I found that the protagonist was ordinary, confused, confused, confused, dizzy, clumsy, weak in limbs, straight-eyed, shrunken and cowardly... A series of characteristics of an otaku. How could this be the emperor of Rome? It's not about showing off your domineering attitude, but at least your protagonist must have some strengths, right? 1. It's okay to behave more competently and clearly. 2. When you are a slave in the beginning, you are just a piece of trash, and you are very likely to be killed like an animal at the first opportunity. Do you think you can survive by following Deng Lao and keeping a low profile? 3. The reaction is still so slow, like a fool. It's normal to feel a little confused at first. But after so many things, I still look confused. This unimproved protagonist is really disappointing. 4. I suggest the author let the princess become the Empress of Rome. That woman is smart, ambitious and cruel. I think she is much better than the protagonist.

The protagonist is not only arrogant but also stupid. He is always played around by others, often with regret or surprise. As the protagonist, you can be frustrated, but can you not debuff the protagonist? And the most frustrating debuff is the protagonist's lack of IQ.

The book is wonderful and true. But I really almost didn't want to read it anymore. There were too many chapters about torturing the master. And the chapters describing the protagonist are only 1/5. These chapters fully describe the cowardice, fear of death, ridiculous senseless self-esteem and arrogance, and inexplicable stubbornness of the protagonist who has just traveled through time. What qualifications does a slave who can drink horse urine have, a slave who has seen many battles on the battlefield but cannot even kill an Armenian archer who was injured and unable to resist? How can he be so proud and arrogant in front of the princess who protected and rescued him three times? I don't understand the author's mentality at all.

Coming from Warden America, my expectations were too high. The first volume is very confusing. The protagonist cannot find his own position. There is a serious mismatch between ambition and ability. When he has just passed through, the most important thing is to survive. The best way is to rely on the strong to thrive. The protagonist has big legs and does not want to hug him. It is really difficult to save others when he has too much time to take care of himself. Even in modern thinking, if you are poor, you must be alone. It's okay if you can't figure it out yourself, and you use your own moral values to criticize others all day long. The author has forced the aura of immortality and the aura of heartthrob. No matter what the protagonist, who is a slave, does, the princess is used to it, and the supporting characters also provide all kinds of help It seems that the author is going Serious and cruel history is a must. The characters all have top-notch IQs and all kinds of infighting. In this case, don't write the protagonist's growth path like a fairy tale. On the way to survival, slaves have to fall in love, and they react in various ways when they encounter things that do not match their three views. Isn't this a proper princess disease?

The author's plan doesn't work. So he can only copy history.

After reading a few chapters, I couldn't help but continue reading. The book is very good and the background is explained very clearly. The Roman Empire, which has been mentioned many times in movies, TV series, and other materials, may be the most familiar period to Chinese people. The author must have made a lot of preparations for writing this book. The information alone is complete enough. This is from the story. It can be seen from the description of the era background at the beginning of the story that a large number of Roman characters appeared one after another, and the conflicts between nobles and slaves were clearly explained through the dialogues of the characters in the story. The author introduced in detail the glory and obscurity of the Roman Empire during this period, and the overall situation was well controlled. This seems to be what the author is good at. However, I personally feel that this book still lacks some shortcomings, and it is not very enjoyable to read. After thinking about it, I briefly and roughly summarized a few points for the author's reference: 1. Focusing too much on the overall situation. Various Roman characters appeared in several wars. The author vividly described the image and character of each person in words, and it was very successful. However, it also made me feel overwhelmed, especially the more convoluted names. There were more and more "S" and "S". In order to clearly identify them, it even affected the reading of the story. I remember a writer once said that the appearance of a story character needs to be very careful, and the relatives and friends above, middle and below the character, left, middle and right may also have to appear because of him. This brings a lot of trouble to writing. However, in this book, this problem is more obvious. Maybe because it must be written, there is no way. What I want to say is that unless you are writing an epic novel, too many characters will affect the rhythm of the novel and thus affect the reader's reading. At least it can appear slowly instead of throwing out a sack all at once. 2. So far, the author has cut the protagonist into the history of Rome. The entry point is not important. What is important is the character's participation. As of now, the protagonist has traveled through the past and is still playing around. His participation in the story is not even as good as that of a soy saucer. This is a bit painful. The author reads the novel from a bird's eye view, while readers tend to I followed the protagonist's eyes to read the novel, which made me feel helpless. I even thought of the word "mixed", and it was a very bad kind of "mixed". This act of soy sauce caused the whole story to be 150,000 words long, but he was still out of sight of the readers, which made people question whether the author was writing about time-travelers or Roman history. This is a rhythm that needs to be rushed. Hehe, even the most rigorous author has to consider the reading needs and reading habits of readers. Some people may not understand Roman history at all. With this kind of overview description, it is easy for readers to become confused and lose interest. 3. Travelers do not necessarily need to open the golden finger, because understanding the history itself is the biggest cheat. However, Calabis is in a very poor life. Not only is he a slave, but he is also a slave who will die at any time. Someone must be talking. Is this to torture the master? Absolutely, absolutely. The author seems to have explained this. I want to say that you are right, the author. The rhythm and style of the novel determine whether it can become the cornerstone of a god. Therefore, even if you abuse the master, as long as there is a good reason, it is reasonable. However, not every reader thinks according to the author's thoughts. Therefore, the author must take the initiative in advance and try to make the readers follow your ideas instead of ignoring them. For example, what is Calabis's mental journey when he is abused? What kind of psychological torture did he experience during the emotional transition between submission and violence? The author doesn't write much, so readers can only "guess" based on the explicit plot. It is conceivable that such guesses are often "unguessed" (if you guessed correctly, what else did the author write?) Therefore, the interest in reading can only become less and less. I'm about to go to work, so I'll just write this. I'm in a hurry and I hope I'll correct my words if they don't convey my meaning or make them offensive. Of course, if there are any mistakes, please correct me.

Dreaming back to that afternoon ten years ago, my Karabia😭, my little sunfish😭, my Wu Cai😭, my Emily😭

For example, the Centurion at the beginning. Such humiliation to him. He was almost killed. Normal people should take revenge. I saw that it was cloudy and foggy behind me.

How many years have you been imprisoned? Why was it released suddenly?

Why are all the literary youths who write about Rome so seriously ill?

Congratulations, this is the top historical online novel in my mind.

Is this...... Released after completing the labor reform period? 😏

This book is well written and has a Roman flavor. I didn't know it wasn't so popular.

A masterpiece of foreign history in my mind

The novel tells the story of the protagonist who grew up step by step from a humble person to an earth-shaking big shot during Caesar's Roman era, and finally how he assisted Caesar to become a talented person and finally established the Roman Empire. First of all, the author has a certain background in historical realism, and his description and evaluation of historical background and historical figures are also relatively objective. For our readers, we can also learn some knowledge while reading the novel. Generally speaking, this should be a novel that is more suitable for solving the book shortage. Although it is not very good, it is still much better than Xiaobai and others. However, whether the three views are consistent will play a decisive role in the reader's acceptance of reading. ---Recommended by the official @hao "The Thirty-Six Strategies of the Great Shuhuang" Come to us for the Shuhuang!!!

When I read this book more than ten years ago, I was still a middle school student. I couldn't understand the history in it, and I only knew about Caesar. At that time, I read this book purely for the pornographic content 🤓, but now this version does not have that flavor.

I always feel that the author is a woman. Sometimes I feel autistic while reading the plot and writing. (What about being indecisive, being passionate, showing love and loyalty...) I feel autistic on the spot...

I won't comment on other aspects, but the combat aspect is really confusing! It's impossible to imagine the battle scene! A confrontation between two armies depicts the compactness and chaos of a melee involving 200,000,000 people!

1 Talent, that is, 240 gold ores, 6,000 silver drachs or dinars, and 24,000 copper sesterces - the annual salary of a Roman soldier was approximately 900 copper sesterces (that is, 36 silver dinars)

The author has published physical books! There is no doubt about the level

The novel tells the story of the protagonist who grew up step by step from a humble person to an earth-shaking big shot during Caesar's Roman era, and finally how he assisted Caesar to become a talented person and finally established the Roman Empire. First of all, the author has a certain background in historical realism, and his description and evaluation of historical background and historical figures are also relatively objective. For our readers, we can also learn some knowledge while reading the novel. ---Recommended by the official @hao "The Thirty-Six Strategies of the Great Shuhuang" Come to us for the Shuhuang!!!

It can only be said that the times have changed since ancient times.