To Usurp the Qing Dynasty

I really finished reading 1911 New China overnight. Come here to check out the author's other books.

Following the author's thinking and analysis, the conclusion derived is that the characters' actions are completely different. . .

The protagonists of these rebellions behaved strangely. They had no idea what the main contradiction was and what the mountain was weighing on the people. They thought that by building a few factories, they would become industrialized and strong? Still don't know why the Westernization Movement failed? Without the emancipation of the mind, the revolution will not succeed.

Hey, is it over with usurping the Qing Dynasty? He hasn't conquered the world yet! Why didn't you write down the fate behind it? Industrialization didn't even begin and it was over. It feels like this novel is just the beginning!

I find it rather awkward. The protagonist wants a girl when he meets her early on, just like taking aphrodisiacs and then not seeing a girl for 10 years. I didn't read the back part, so I don't know what it was like.

The last part is really messy and poorly written. It felt like a full banquet where the entire meal tasted like an overnight meal. If you go to the capital, you will be a hero. If you don't go, you will become a national sinner. What kind of logic.

Looking at the hungry ghost in the main character, I am afraid that if there are tens of thousands of descendants when the main character dies, half of the entire country's fiscal revenue will not be enough to support these people in a hundred years. It is obvious that a selfish and racist person wants to write about the Chinese nation with great justice. It would be a disaster if people like the protagonist were unified.

After reading a lot of historical novels, I found that most of the protagonists are hypocritical and selfish. They give the common people a little benefit and make them feel moved. They do not analyze the background of the time, the primary and secondary conflicts, and the ideological and culture of the time. What is even more bizarre is that the development of science and technology is developed on the basis of orders. This is the case in almost most historical novels. You succeed without even having a foundation, and you really treat the readers as fools.

To conquer the world, you should be upright. If you don't slaughter the slaves, it will be difficult to understand the hatred in your heart.

How to evaluate this? Although the novel from ten years ago was indeed bad, I can still say something pertinent. From the perspective of ten years ago, this novel was indeed good. If we evaluate it from the perspective of today, it is a completely bad work.

The author's writing is good and his historical knowledge is good. As for the plot setting, the male protagonist is a scumbag. The description of love, no, is there love? Only the desire of men for women, or the plot about women, is redundant and a failure! After reading the end of the review, I gave up immediately.

Sometimes it's true that readers don't deserve good books. Why are you just shouting here?

Please recommend a good historical novel like Usurping the Qing Dynasty. The best time is the late Qing Dynasty.

This is the best online novel I have ever read. I have read it N times. It's a pity that Eunuch Ao is the eunuch.

I finally understand that sometimes the standard of a book is different from the evaluation in the book review area... This book is very good, keep up the good work

The protagonist was forced to become the main character by the author just for teasing him, which is an anecdote for the ages. Reading this book will lower your IQ

Too kind to the Tartar boar skin!

Only great chaos can bring great order! ! Can the grievances of more than two hundred years be resolved with heavy taxes in ten years? ? People have short memories, and the royal family will definitely become a hidden danger!

After reading it, it's quite good. Isn't it normal to have a harem in this era? There are a bunch of white lotus flowers in the comment area. I don't know what I'm thinking? Who wouldn't open a harem if they have the ability? Have those who don't like harems really read historical texts?

Half of it is written about women, it's all about those few words, I want to endure it and read the rest, but I really can't bear it, please, can you be more rigorous in writing history? Most of the chapters are about those women, oh, I'm just trying to make up the word count.

Ao Dada hates Kang Youwei so much. Is he such a villain in history?

It's so well written, it has foundation, culture, connotation, history, politics, and guns. It makes people think deeply about how great the writers back then were.

This is the first clear article I have ever read. The only shortcoming is that it is too short.

This is a modern man, armed with historical knowledge, using feudal tools and feudal ideas to dream of a modern "Westernization Movement", so he sees contradictions everywhere. The protagonist uses the idea of ​​​​ancient struggle for hegemony to achieve modern dominance, especially the description of the plot between men and women without distinction of importance, which is too dramatic. Usurping the Qing Dynasty? Chuanqing? (This Qing Dynasty is not the Manchu Qing Dynasty, but a legacy like the Manchu Qing Dynasty)

The protagonist gets obsessed when he sees a woman and doesn't do the real thing. Other important characters in history are almost reduced to the protagonist's tools. The supporting characters are poorly portrayed and the story is not detailed and appropriate. It's a spicy chicken book.

Today, a book club posted a picture and found out how the angel Oscar is lv4. Then let go of other people's dungeons. Compared with other dynasties, the gap is too big.

It's okay. The part about Nanyang firing cannons and killing the natives was well written, but the writing about women was not good.

This book was written ten years ago. Everything else is pretty good, but the emotional writing is terrible.

A very nice novel. Of course, there are a lot of bugs: for example, it's ridiculous that a recruit becomes invincible after 3 months of training. Another example is that a military-industrial enterprise was built from scratch in less than a year and can produce weapons in large quantities. For example, one side of the separatist regime only started to set up education after a few years. Have you never seen the movies or TV series about the Red and Blue sides competing for hegemony?

It's written like a lunatic, but people have recommended it everywhere, and I'm convinced.