A Last Stronghold of the Late Tang

I lost interest immediately after seeing the system. Today's authors feel like they can't even write books without a system.

It doesn't matter if there is a system, but the bottom line is that there is no system in historical literature 😐

In this current environment, everyone knows that if you don't have a system and rely on yourself, you won't be able to survive in other worlds. At best, your life will be mediocre.

A group of historical articles in the comment area must be systematic. How many of the top ten historical articles are systematic? Systemless is not the same as writing well. If you like to read system articles, just click on the first page of Qidian. Com, it's all terrible.

I really don't know why the system is being sprayed. These are two ways of writing. Is it true that ordinary people could live for more than a month without a system in the past? One week is enough, right? Are these people really weird enough to spray settings?

Wouldn't he become a cool writer if he had a system? Wouldn't it be better if I went directly to Shuangwen?

The casualties were 1 to 1. All of Huang Chao's subordinates were Xiang Yu and Lu Bu, right?

I am a mud horse and a pig's trotter. I have shot more than a hundred arrows in a row. My arms are not sore or tired. I can still continue to kill the cavalry. This is not cheating. I am Superman, Spider-Man 🥵

I haven't read many books yet, but a bunch of people are arguing about whether historical texts should have a system😓😓😓 I read them regardless of whether they have a system or not, as long as they are good-looking and reasonable! I have only read a little bit of the novel, and the author's explanation of the protagonist's system should only add to the protagonist's personal abilities! Firstly, it failed to explode troops and horses, and secondly, it failed to explode technology. Is it so recruiting? I haven't seen anyone criticizing other historical novels either? If you read this novel and there are no other problems, but you don't like it just because the system added some points, then just delete it from the bookshelf. There is no need to look condescending. I feel that people who read system articles are very low-level and are just novices who like to read mindless articles! I have been reading novels for several years. I don't know about other categories, but there shouldn't be any novels in the historical genre that don't give the protagonist a clue, right? Can I read a novel too? This is also history, and it is also the end of the Tang Dynasty. It also started by hunting Huang Chao. Zhao Da, Zhao Huaian, have you seen them all? Didn't Zhao Da die? Zhao Da's force value is very high when he appears. The same goes for the protagonist of the author. He just said that he has set it up as soon as he appears, and he levels up bit by bit. Don't say that one is practiced by oneself and the other is added by the system. The protagonist does not lie down and let the system add points. He rushes into battle and kills enemies like Zhao Da, but the system refines and makes his improved abilities more obvious. Let readers see how much has improved. So I don't understand, what's there to say? It also looks like the system literature is very low-end. I don't know if you have ever searched for Hong Kong TV series or cultivating immortals. There are a bunch of flat-upgraded novels there, but no one comes to show off and make fun of them! If the author has the talent, please give it to me!

Once you see it is systematic, you don't need to read it. Which good historical text is systematic? Isn't it because the author's writing skills and knowledge level are not enough, so he can only rely on the system to directly promote development?