National Creation: Shaping the Strongest World from Scratch

I don't think anyone would think that writing about farming can avoid farming at all, right? I will not delete the comment, but in order to prevent other readers from clicking in and being misled. I need to clarify: 1. Some people obviously only saw the word "strongest", and then they just thought it was a fast-paced and brainless article. I didn't even read the introduction. Isn't the Creation text obviously about farming? Also, isn't it rare for a chat in the comment section to start in a national game? Co-authors, you don't watch sand cartoons at all, and you don't read national online articles, right? 2. Also, you haven't even seen the subsequent chapters, how can you conclude that the protagonist has no confidence and is "pretentious"? It is normal for pretentiousness to appear in brainless cool articles. But don't you think it's funny when this word appears in the Creation text? You call a god who can create the world pretentious? ? Conclusion: The review is completely untenable. It belongs to those who mistakenly clicked in because they thought it was a mindless article. If there are other comments later, you can think carefully about whether they are more likely to fall into this category. You said that the title of the book is easily misleading, so let me tell you that there is a cooling-off period of half a year for changing the title of the book. Don't waste your time here.