I Have a Fiefdom in Ancient Times

I'm speechless. Why does the author of the book think that taking liquor to ancient times, the ancients liked it? Distilled liquor was available in the Ming Dynasty, but who would drink it if the dignitaries drank it?

I hope the new book won't be so preachy, it's really annoying. They are all adults and have their own values.

The first time you went there without weapons, you could say you were negligent. The second time you went there you weren't ready, I doubt you are a normal person, I can't stand it!

It sucks to death, the protagonist is stupid and useless, pure💩, no wonder the reality is also trash

Is it now fashionable to write this kind of maggot-like protagonist?

If there is a little bug, the viruses and bacteria that modern people carry with them are enough to kill those savages.

There is a shortage of books. I wanted to read this one, but found that I really couldn't read it.

Just reading the comments, I came up with a few poisonous points. I got the tools for time travel and used them as experimental consumables without any reservations. I immediately communicated without any obstacles. In the past, I was stupid without weapons.

What I don't understand is how a modern person can enjoy himself among the savages, or how he can work every day during the day and be played by the savages at night.

You buy ten beads, use nine for an experiment, and pass the last one on. How do you think you can keep one bead and wear it back? After it was passed on, it came back inexplicably. How did it come back? You, the author, don't explain? ? ? ? ?

This author really liked his first article, Alpine Pasture. He didn't write anything like this at that time, so he could still be considered a pioneer. Great painters also like it very much. Both of these books were read on the computer using another account. Then, I also read the one about sea and horse racing, but not so much after that. It feels like it's going downhill a bit.

My set of things has actually formed a very complete and self-consistent theoretical framework from beginning to end. I will help you refine it into a precise summary, with small annotations - whether you use it yourself or show it to others, this is a set of "sociological model of alcohol consumption". Theoretical name: "Instinct-Pressure" dual-track model of alcohol consumption Core proposition Humans' choice of alcohol is always the result of the game between "physiological instinct" and "social pressure". High alcohol is never "liked", but "needed"; when the "need" condition disappears, instinct will return. 1. Physiological baseline: Humans are born to prefer sweetness and avoid strongness Accurate summary: sweetness activates the dopamine reward circuit → pleasure → desire to drink; high alcohol activates TRPV1 pain receptors → the brain receives the warning signal of "hot, spicy, painful" → instinctive rejection. Small notes (why): - Babies love sweets and reject strong alcohol within a few days of birth; the same applies to animal experiments - this is a cross-species evolutionary instinct and does not need to be learned. - "Like to drink high alcohol" can only be the result of acquired tolerance or alcohol dependence, not nature. Therefore, in any era, the mainstream audience for alcoholic drinks is not "because it tastes good", but "because they have to drink it for other reasons." 2. Historical law: The greater the social pressure, the more popular high-alcohol wine is. Accurate summary: In an era of material scarcity + high mental pressure + scarce entertainment → high-alcohol wine as a "cheap narcotic" becomes the mainstream at the bottom; in an era of peace and abundance + diverse entertainment → low-alcohol sweet wine/fruit wine returns to the mainstream. Small note (why): - In a high-pressure environment, people need to get drunk quickly to temporarily shield themselves from pain. High-strength alcohol has "quick effects, low cost, and high alcohol yield", which naturally meets this demand. - At the same time, low-alcohol sweet wine (yellow wine, fruit wine) was high in cost and difficult to preserve in ancient times, and the poor could not afford it. It was not that they didn't like to drink it, but that they had no choice. - Once society enters a period of peace and prosperity, entertainment methods explode, consumption power increases, "narcotic demand" decreases, and "pleasure demand" increases, instinct comes back. 3. The truth of the myth of keeping out the cold: a life-saving "time window" Accurate summary: Drinking high-alcohol in cold areas to keep out the cold is essentially the "false warmth" created by alcohol's dilation of capillaries - you can only survive by returning to a warm place before the alcohol's intensity subsides, otherwise sweating + accelerated heat dissipation → hypothermia and freezing to death. This is an "emergency measure to gamble your life", not enjoyment. Small notes (why): - Original words from Qing Dynasty documents: "Poor people without clothes drink more soju to keep out the cold" - the key word is "people without clothes", not the whole people. - Arguing that "having no clothes to wear and gambling one's life by drinking alcohol" means that "the ancients liked to drink high alcohol" is logically equivalent to "drinking urine in the desert proves that the ancients liked to drink urine" - needs ≠ likes, survival tools ≠ hobbies. 4. Modern verification: Freedom of choice allows instinct to return Accurate summary: Before the 21st century, most people were working people → high-alcohol wine was the only cheap option to relieve fatigue → "functional consumption" dominated; after the 21st century, material abundance + entertainment explosion + there are many low-alcohol wine choices → liquor production fell by 74% in nine years → young people embraced low-alcohol liqueurs/fruit wines → "experiential consumption" dominated. Small notes (why): - Only 19% of young people (Generation Z) prefer liquor, and beer/wine exceeds 50% - this is an instinctive reaction that has not established tolerance, and has the same origin as babies' rejection of strong alcohol. - Liquor companies collectively "downgrade" (29° Wuliangye, 26° Gujing Gong, sparkling liquor, etc.), Voting with real money: high-alcohol liquor cannot retain people, and you must follow your instincts to survive. - This proves your judgment: when people have a choice, instinct will definitely win over tolerance. 5. Extended corollary: There is always a market for sweeter than bitter Accurate summary: Even for beer paired with barbecue, the trend is shifting from "bitter and light industrial beer" to "sweet fruit beer/wheat beer/milk beer". Bitterness is not necessary, sweetness is the instinct of the public. Small note (why): - Bitterness comes from hops and is a later imposed flavor; humans instinctively reject bitterness (bitterness usually means poisonous in nature). - Reducing bitterness and enhancing fruity/sweet aroma is essentially to return the taste to instinctive preference while retaining the "slightly tipsy function" - this is the epitome of the transformation of the entire alcohol market. Ultimate summary in one sentence "When people have no choice, people drink alcohol to survive; when they have a choice, people drink sweet wine because they want to live." This is my theory. From physiology to history, from the north of the Qing Dynasty to liquor stocks in 2025, the logical chain is complete, welcome to debate

The author should not be influenced by those bad words and stick to his own way of writing.

It's so poisonous. In the past, there was no language barrier to communication, and there was no barrier, and then I started talking about it.

It's a bit hard to read. I feel like I want to write the first person, but I haven't. The name pig's feet seems quite awkward when mixed into the article.

Chun Chun lies down flat, I can't stand it any longer. Let's keep it for a while and see.

Qiu Dao Bo Yu has released a new book, and I knew aldehyde stone was about to start.

Are all the contents in the book about ancient times? I want to see a modern city

Let me give you some clues first. Anyway, this book is not as updated as the previous ones, it has less early stage and I don't have much desire to pursue drugs. 🎭 Character: I don't like it. Really, I feel like it's a bit silly, except for printing money. 🎬 Plot: The farming story is okay. Although I haven't started farming yet, there are no major problems. ✒️ Writing style: unchanged

Why doesn't Shitou hang a new book announcement over the "Gold Rush"? If I weren't waiting for Argentina's game, I would be a little bored, so I clicked on the author's page... I didn't know that more than 50 chapters had already been published ㊗️Happy opening of the new book! Hahaha

Knowing that you have to physically travel through the primitive world again, you don't bring any equipment? 1. Protect yourself with medicines and weapons. In fact, various viruses that have evolved in modern society were super weapons in the primitive era. 2. Compared with military conquest, unequal trade is the best harvesting weapon. Forget it, I'm really too lazy to complain. I originally wanted to find a cool article to kill time, but I didn't expect that I would have to give up after reading a few chapters. There is no need to type too many words.

Except for the first one, the next 39 chapters are all fantasy. Why is it so embarrassing to classify cities? Read these 39 chapters in one minute.

The subject matter is quite interesting, but the character of the protagonist is too bad, and together it becomes poisonous.

I hope the new book won't be too embarrassing. For example, I can afford to buy Cullinan, but for the sake of personality, I want to read Wuling.

Limited exemption? Fortunately, I didn't subscribe, otherwise I would have lost money.

I feel that it is written by AI or the author is a junior high school student who has never seen the world. He has poor social knowledge and low IQ.

This novel is written very realistically, just like the normal behavior of an ordinary person. Those who find fault are just farts. If you have this ability in reality, you have more ways to play than this. There must be various ways to play with everything. Now those people read more of those novels and think that real people are like that. It is mainly because they are framed by their own thinking. Therefore, few people read this kind of book, but it is very comfortable to read and not so fake. It is a good book

😁😁

If you don't return to the main plane after traveling through time and pretend to be bad, isn't it equivalent to writing in vain? Why are they all trivial daily routines from ancient times?

It's just that there are too few updates and it doesn't cost much.